Channel
@netdolgovRF
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
577subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001360708280 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @netdolgovRF |
| Description | Кредитный Юрист РФ |
| Created | 11 February 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/netdolgovRF |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Aug 2026, 18:03 | 577 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 02:17 | 577 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 22 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 14 (22 June 2026 – 2 August 2026) |
| Views total | 620 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 18:03 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
LIFE IS GOOD ТЮМЕНЬ‼️ Привет Андрей (с) Аллегрова Знакомьтесь, кто забыл. Это Андрей https://t.me/lohovodLIG/203 Очень известным данного гражданина сделала не сама финансовая пирамида. А вопрос, который сформирован абсолютно непонятно (см. видео). 15.01.2021 года Андрей не смог на него ответить. Директор 9 уровня, превратил свой ответ в интернет - мем и стал его олицетворением (далее - мем). И вот наступил 20…
Ещё про Маланчука
ИНФОЦЫГАН ПОПАЛ ПОД РАЗДАЧУ 170 000 рублей он получил легко. Но потом выяснилось, что клиент пришёл не один, а с сильным юристом. Финал оказался дорогим - выплатить пришлось уже 500 000 рублей. Руку на пульсе держит Максим - это волкодав среди юристов.
#ПотокCash / #Меркурий / #cashflow — Вопросы сектантам от Юриста. 👉 Hype News. Подписаться
В «Поток КЕШ» началась настоящая паника. На эфир пришёл Максим - человек, который помогает пострадавшим от финансовых пирамид защищать свои права через суд. Он начал задавать неудобные вопросы, но вместо ответов организаторы тут же стали отключать ему микрофон. Похоже, открытый разговор в планы не входил.
Лохотрон #ПотокCash не хочет пояснять ни за Blackbit, ни за Whitebit. Обе площадки в России — вне закона. @vklader
LIFE IS GOOD МАРИЙ ЭЛ🍾 Сегодня, 11.07.2026 года, очередной житель Республики был признан потерпевшим и гражданским истцом. Об уголовном деле от 2025 года, мы уже сообщали ранее. Тут👇 https://t.me/netdolgovRF/2030 Судебные заседания в Приморском районном суде города Санкт - Петербурга продолжаются. Напоминаем, чтобы вернуть свои паевые с процентами, ваш представитель должен обратиться в суд с иском к кооператив…
Лето и особо новостей нет - по этому и тишина на канале. Из свежих новостей; #ПотокCash лидерам начинают поступать первые угрозы по заявлениям,с выводом так же беда,проект в стадии добора. С каждым днем Буратины все сильнее и сильнее жалуются в чате чтоб им убрали лимиты и открыли вывод в юсдт так как нужно закрывать кредитки. На группу лиц лидеров заводят уголовные дела по старому проекту который работал пять лет …
👑МЫ НА ОТР👑 https://otr-online.ru/news/sekret-bogatstva-za-million-rublei-kak-infocygane-zamanivayut-lyudei-v-svoi-seti-247377.html 👨💼ДЕНЬГИ ВЕРНУЛИ👨💼 https://vk.ru/wall35687177_3455 🎓ЮРИСТ🎓 Тел. 88001019501
Возбудили уголовное дело в отношении пирамиды Antares Юристы из Санкт-Петербурга добились возбуждения уголовного дела в отношении финансовой пирамиды Antares. Неожиданно, но уголовное дело возбуждено в республике Марий Эл, которая всегда была неким хабом, в котором базировались зазывалы в пирамиды. МВД по Республике Марий Эл сообщило потерпевшему, что 6 июня 2026 года возбуждено уголовное дело № 1260188001000806 п…
По доступным публичным следам в пирамиду Antares Trade зазывали Андрей Библиев, Игорь Жигалев, Елена Дуденкова, Антон Потатуев, Рустам Мухаметгалеев, Юлия Кальницкая, Дмитрий Николаев, Александр Сердюк, Александр Минаев, Олег Павлецов, Александр Репринцев, Евгений Абдуллин, Дмитрий Разепин, Юлия Кальницкая, Александр Тихонов, Сергей Реш, Антон Волошин и другие. @vklader
Charoit Project - последствия! Та самая матричная, финансовая пирамида, которая работала по схеме «дари – получай», позиционируя себя как касса взаимопомощи, привет МММ 2.0. Возбуждено уголовное дело, все любезно предоставившие свои банковские карты, для транзита денежных средств, теперь официально дропы. Денежные средства с них взыскиваются посредством гражданских исков и исков Прокуратуры. Руку на пульсе держи…
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @netdolgovRF. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 140,056 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Kредитный Юрист РФ” (@netdolgovRF), 577 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/netdolgovRF.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.