Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

ڪُنّاشَة؛

@IIP3B

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

5,921subscribers

-17 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001422838916
TypeChannel
Username@IIP3B
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/IIP3B

Growth

5,9215,9385,929.56 August 2026 — 5,938 subscribers6 August 2026 — 5,938 subscribers7 August 2026 — 5,937 subscribers10 August 2026 — 5,928 subscribers13 August 2026 — 5,921 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 7 days, net -17. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,918–5,941 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 09:175,921-7
10 Aug 2026, 14:225,928-9
7 Aug 2026, 03:415,937-1
6 Aug 2026, 20:005,938no change
6 Aug 2026, 19:575,938first reading

Engagement

24 posts held, back to 26 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
13.6%
avg views ÷ 5,921 subscribers
Avg views / post
803
24 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
24
of 24 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held24 (26 July 202611 August 2026)
Views total19,273
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 03:43 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 11:21 UTC149 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @Uthaimeen_InstitutePhoto

تصممين؟ تمنتجين؟ مهارتكِ لها أثر. سخرّي مهارتكِ في خدمة العلم الشرعي وشاركي معنا في إعداد المحتوى البصري لمعهد ابن عثيمين وطلابه. 📩 بدأنا مراجعة الطلبات ولا يزال الانضمام مفتوحًا: @uthaimeenSupport_bot 🌱قدّمي الآن وكوني جزءا من الأثر!

10 Aug 2026, 21:32 UTC253 viewsread 12 August 2026

- «إنّي لأفرَح إذا جَاء الليْل؛ لَيس إلا لِأستَريح مِن رُؤيَة النّاس». • سُفيَان الثّورِي -رَحِمَهُ الله-. • وِترُكم.

7 Aug 2026, 14:26 UTC448 viewsread 12 August 2026

- لَا تنسونا من صالح الدُعاء.. الله يؤتيكم سُؤلكم آل كُنّاشة.

5 Aug 2026, 14:41 UTC656 viewsread 12 August 2026

- كُل الذِين تعثّروا لَم يَعلمُوا أنّ الوصُولَ سبيلُه العثراتِ.

4 Aug 2026, 15:28 UTC710 viewsread 12 August 2026

- اللهُمّ أنجِ المُستَضعفين من المُؤمنين، وارحَم ممن نحسَبهم شُهَدَاءَ عندك.

3 Aug 2026, 16:42 UTC843 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @Namarq4

ستتعافىٰ يا صَاحبي؛ إذا فاض قلبك باليقين، يقينًا لا ريب فيه أنَّ الله أرحم بك من نفسك ووالديك، يقينًا تُضمِّد به جراحك عندما تمزِّقك الحياة وتخدشك أنياب الابتلاءات، يقينًا يكون لك خير متَّكئٍ إذا تباعدت عنك الأكتاف، يقينًا أنَّ في الجنَّة ستنسىٰ كل تنهيدة آه خرجت منك ❤️‍🩹.

2 Aug 2026, 00:47 UTC892 viewsread 12 August 2026

- «لا تَغفلوا عِن إخوَانكم الذِين أهلَكهم السّحر، دثّروهم فِي دعائكم؛ أن يُطهرهم الله من بلائِهم، ويَشفي صُدورهم، ويُزيح ثِقل الألَم عَنهم، وأن يأخُذَ الله كُل ساحرٍ أخذَ عزيزٍ مقتدر، إنهُ على ذلِك قَادر».

31 Jul 2026, 15:03 UTC946 viewsread 12 August 2026

- اللهُم حَبّب إلَينا المَدينة كحُبّنا مَكةَ أو أشَدّ.

30 Jul 2026, 21:26 UTC≈1,040 viewsread 12 August 2026

​​- «اللهُمّ صَلّ وسلّم على النّبيِّ الشهيدِ والمُجاهِد الصِّندِيد؛ خَير مَن دَعا واستَغفَر، وجاهَدَ وعَسكَر؛ جاهدَ من أجلِ التّوحِيد، وعَلى آلهِ الأطهَار وعلى أصحَابِهِ الأخيَار».

30 Jul 2026, 21:26 UTC992 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

- مُصيبةُ فقدِ النّبي ﷺ أعظمُ من مصيبة الإنسان بفَقدِ ولدِه! • شَمائلُ النّبي ﷺ، تَفسير الشّيخ عبد الرزاق البدر.

Showing the 12 most recent of 24 posts we hold for @IIP3B. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 75,142 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

أُسَيْد..🍂
@usayd_98 · 139,064
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 13 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ڪُنّاشَة؛” (@IIP3B), 5,921 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/IIP3B.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.