Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Serenità.

Channel

Serenità.

@serenityeg

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

33,862subscribers

-177 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001908512203
TypeChannel
Username@serenityeg
Description«‌‏وآنس كل حبيب بحبيبه يا ربّ.» Facebook page: fb.me/serenita.23 لينك قناتنا الثانية قرآن ⬇️ https://t.me/yaqeen124
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live21 August 2026
Measurements held15
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 21 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/serenityeg

Growth

33,86234,03933,950.57 August 2026 — 34,039 subscribers7 August 2026 — 34,039 subscribers7 August 2026 — 34,035 subscribers9 August 2026 — 34,019 subscribers10 August 2026 — 34,005 subscribers11 August 2026 — 33,989 subscribers12 August 2026 — 33,979 subscribers13 August 2026 — 33,968 subscribers14 August 2026 — 33,950 subscribers16 August 2026 — 33,928 subscribers17 August 2026 — 33,916 subscribers18 August 2026 — 33,902 subscribers19 August 2026 — 33,888 subscribers20 August 2026 — 33,873 subscribers21 August 2026 — 33,862 subscribers7 August 202621 August 2026
15 measurements spanning 14 days, net -177. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 33,835–34,066 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
21 Aug 2026, 13:0933,862-11
20 Aug 2026, 10:4333,873-15
19 Aug 2026, 10:3533,888-14
18 Aug 2026, 10:5433,902-14
17 Aug 2026, 12:5233,916-12
16 Aug 2026, 05:2233,928-22
14 Aug 2026, 15:4533,950-18
13 Aug 2026, 04:2533,968-11
12 Aug 2026, 05:1233,979-10
11 Aug 2026, 02:1933,989-16
10 Aug 2026, 00:2934,005-14
9 Aug 2026, 00:5234,019-16
7 Aug 2026, 21:1534,035-4
7 Aug 2026, 12:3034,039no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:2834,039first reading

Engagement

50 posts held, back to 28 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 34 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
11.1%
avg views ÷ 33,862 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,750
50 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.23%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
50
of 50 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 August 2026
Posts held50 (28 July 202622 August 2026)
Views total187,452
Reactions total4,186
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken22 Aug 2026, 16:57 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
1,820
Videos
134
Links
12

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

4,186 reactions across 50 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 82.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3,43282.0%
🥰53812.9%
💘1072.56%
😭340.812%
🕊190.454%
❤‍🔥160.382%
😢150.358%
🍓110.263%
😍100.239%
🌚40.096%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 50 of the 50 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,186reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 50 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 22 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
7
across the posts below
Posts paid on
6
of 50 we hold a reading for · 12%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @serenityeg. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 50 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 July 2026 to 22 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

22 Aug 2026, 06:33 UTC552 views36 reactionsread 22 August 2026

أصْبحْنَا نسْألك أن تَجعَل عاقبتنَا فِي كُلِّ أَمْر: رِضَا، وخيْر، وَسرُور صباحٌ هادِئٌ يبدأُ بكلامِ رَبي.♡

26🥰10

21 Aug 2026, 19:02 UTC≈1,030 views64 reactionsread 22 August 2026

لو انا رحت زيارة لحد من غير معاد مُسبق وهو اعتذرلي انه مش حيقدر يفتح بابه ويستقبلني فارجع عادي من غير زعل لان ده افضل ليا زي ماقال الله في القرآن ( وإن قيل لكم ارجعوا فارجعوا هو أزكى لكم .. ) قيس بقى علي ده اني لو اتصلت بحد او بعتله رساله علي اي حاجه وماردش عليا ، الطبيعي والصح اني احترم خصوصيته وما اضغطش عليه بالمكالمات او رسائل التأنيب او علاملات الاستفهام !! وفكره ان الشخص ده اونلاين بس مش بيرد مش شرط يكون حاج

57🥰4🍓3

20 Aug 2026, 06:56 UTC≈2,190 views85 reactionsread 22 August 2026

وَعَسَى القَادِمُ كُله خيرٍ وَعَسَى أَنْ يهبنا الله أعظم مما حلمنا به.💗

72🥰13

19 Aug 2026, 18:33 UTC≈2,400 views16 reactionsread 22 August 2026

سلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركاته. بفضل الله مستمرين في جمع حالة دين السيدة اللي بتنزل كل شهر.. السيدة تعول 4 أبناء وزوجها مريض حالة المعيشة لديهم متعسرة، أعرفها معرفة شخصية. مقدار الدين 6730ج في حالة عدم الدفع تتعرض للسجن، الحالة ثقة بفضل الله. هنقسمهم أسهم : ( 70 سهم ) السهم 100ج متاح التبرع بأقل ولو بجنية ومتاح بأكثر من سهم بأي مبلغ. لا تحقرن من معروف شيئًا. قال النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم: "من نفَّس عن مؤمن كُربة

16

19 Aug 2026, 11:03 UTC≈2,400 views67 reactionsread 22 August 2026

فليكن مكاني في الصفوف الخلفية؛ فلا أُزاحم أحدًا، ولا أتكالب على شيء. يكفيني من الحياة هدوءٌ وراحةُ بال.. تُغنيني العزلةُ عن زحامٍ فارغٍ لا يمنح روحي إلا التوترَ والحزن. لا أحب أن أتصدَّر المشهد، ولا أن تُسلَّط عليَّ الأضواء. تكفيني مشاهدي الخاصة في الحياة، ويكفيني ضوءٌ خافتٌ لا يراه أحدٌ سواي.

63🥰3😢1

18 Aug 2026, 06:59 UTC≈3,120 views102 reactionsread 22 August 2026

بحب أوي دُعاء "رَبِّ إنِّي لِمَآ أَنزَلت إِلَيَّ مِن خَير فَقِير" فكرة إنك بتقول لربنا إنك فقير لأي خير منّه مش خير مُحدَّد قد ايه دعوة فيها تذلُّل لربنا وإدراك الإنسان لحجمه الحقيقي وقد ايه هو مِسكين وفقير مهما كان حاله وقد ايه ربنا غَني وعَظيم ف كُل الأحوال، دعوة جميلة فيها وعي كبير وصِدق غير طبيعي.

75🥰25💘2

17 Aug 2026, 17:25 UTC≈3,310 views84 reactionsread 22 August 2026

إستغل وجودك على الفيسبوك، وإستوريهات الواتس، ووجودك على وسائل التواصُل الاجتماعي عمومًا، في الدعوة إلى الله حتى لو كنت غارق في الذنوب من رأسك إلى قدميك، فادعُ إلى الله بردو، لان مفيش حد معصوم. إستغل كلَّ حاجه بين يديك في الدَّعوة، متعرفش ممكن يكونُ بوست واحد سبب في تغيير حياة شخص للأفضل والاحسن. قال النبي ﷺ : (لَأنْ يهديَ اللهُ بكَ رجُلًا واحدًا خيرٌ لكَ مِن أنْ يكونَ لكَ حُمْرُ النَّعَمِ) نسألُ الله أن يستعملنا

77🥰7

17 Aug 2026, 09:03 UTC≈3,200 views73 reactionsread 22 August 2026

مش بس نتيجة سعيك هو توفيق ربنا.. سعيك في حد ذاته هو توفيق من ربنا .

66💘5🥰2

16 Aug 2026, 21:26 UTC≈3,490 views94 reactionsread 22 August 2026

يا رب اللي شايل هم حاجة يصحى يلاقيها فُرجت من حيث لا يحتسب

87❤‍🔥5😭2

Showing the 12 most recent of 50 posts we hold for @serenityeg. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 520,251 of 1,583,249entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

The sun will rise and we will try again
@simple_details · 91,549
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 17 August 2026
Here You Find Your Peace of Mind
@YourPeace0 · 114,841
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 14 August 2026
مدينة البؤس بتنهار
@madentelboiis · 134,726
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 13 August 2026
تذكير بالله
@votojrav · 69,053
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 20 August 2026
كـلـمَـاتُ .. Kalimat ♡
@Kkalimaatt · 129,589
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 13 August 2026
صَحٍيف‏
@saahef · 100,653
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 15 August 2026

This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 21 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Serenità.” (@serenityeg), 33,862 subscribers as measured 21 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/serenityeg.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.