Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 93% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
32 measurements spanning 42 days, net +264. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 21,975–22,381 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 32
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 03:56
22,334
+43
15 Sept 2026, 23:41
22,291
-7
14 Sept 2026, 06:38
22,298
-3
12 Sept 2026, 15:19
22,301
-7
10 Sept 2026, 16:19
22,308
+56
7 Sept 2026, 10:18
22,252
-14
4 Sept 2026, 13:40
22,266
-15
3 Sept 2026, 01:15
22,281
-13
2 Sept 2026, 00:04
22,294
+1
31 Aug 2026, 21:48
22,293
+29
30 Aug 2026, 22:16
22,264
+35
30 Aug 2026, 01:33
22,229
+6
29 Aug 2026, 00:34
22,223
+106
28 Aug 2026, 00:43
22,117
+4
27 Aug 2026, 02:32
22,113
-10
25 Aug 2026, 06:42
22,123
-4
24 Aug 2026, 07:31
22,127
+30
22 Aug 2026, 18:27
22,097
+12
21 Aug 2026, 08:26
22,085
-1
19 Aug 2026, 12:25
22,086
first reading
Engagement
172 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 61 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
13.8%
avg views ÷ 22,334 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,080
92 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.80%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
92
of 172 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026
Posts held
172 (6 August 2026 – 3 September 2026)
Views total
283,680
Reactions total
10,771
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
3 Sept 2026, 12:19 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
20m 08s
Average length
36s
Measured directly from 34 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
18,523 reactions across 172 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
8,702
47.0%
🤣
2,222
12.0%
👍
1,737
9.38%
😢
1,050
5.67%
🤔
884
4.77%
🕊
869
4.69%
🔥
801
4.32%
😍
652
3.52%
😁
558
3.01%
custom 5280813237057638743
352
1.90%
🙏
276
1.49%
🎉
256
1.38%
💯
134
0.723%
🏆
21
0.113%
💅
9
0.049%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 172 of the 172 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 18,523 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 172 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 172 we hold a reading for · 1%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @royalnews11. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 172 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 August 2026 to 3 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Мама Меган отметила 70-летие в тишине и без семьи, отмечают инсайдеры.
Пока герцог и герцогиня Сассекские вместе с детьми находятся в Великобритании, мать Меган, Дория Рэгланд, провела свое 70-летие в Калифорнии.
Издание Page Six опубликовало кадры папарацци, сделанные в день юбилея Дории:
Никаких пышных вечеринок и вспышек софитов — 2 сентября Рэгланд встретила в максимально расслабленном домашнем формате.
На снимк…
Король Карл и королева Камилла встретились в Британском музее с президентом Франции Эмманюэлем Макроном и его супругой Брижит. Они открыли выставку знаменитого гобелена из Байё.
70-метровое средневековое полотно XI века, подробно изображающее Нормандское завоевание Англии и Битву при Гастингсе 1066 года, впервые за почти тысячелетие покинуло территорию Франции и прибыло в Лондон
В Австралии назвали 3,8-метрового крокодила в честь принца Уильяма 🐊
У принца Уэльского появился весьма неожиданный, но внушительный «тёзка» в мире дикой природы.
Роберт Ирвин вместе с командой исследователей поймал и чипировал огромного гребнистого крокодила длиной 3,8 метра. Имя рептилии дали прямое и громкое — «Принц Уильям».
Команда заповедника Стива Ирвина назвала крокодила в честь наследника британского прест…
Сегодня 70 лет исполнилось маме Меган, Дории Рэгланд🎂
Дория Лойс Рэгланд родилась 2 сентября 1956 года в Кливленде в семье Джинетт Арнелл и Альвина Азелла Рэгланда. Родители происходили из рабочих афроамериканских семей. Отец занимался антиквариатом и имел собственный небольшой бизнес, а мама работала в медицинской сфере.
У Дории есть индийские корни: её прапрадед по линии матери был выходцем из Индии.
Когда девочк…
Школы в Англии переходят на «секретный режим» из-за Гарри и Меган
Кажется, возвращение Сассекских в Великобританию из разряда слухов постепенно переходит в категорию «готовьтесь заранее».
Престижные частные школы в районе Котсуолдс начали рассылать родителям довольно любопытные письма. Официальная формулировка — в учебных заведениях могут появиться дети семей «с повышенным вниманием со стороны СМИ».
Известно, что Ар…
📸 Церемония выноса знамени, 1989 год ❤️
Спасибо Всем, кто читает рекламу (и переходит по ссылочкам🥹) — рада, если она была кому-то полезна❤️
Мне это очень помогает, сейчас кликов очень мало
Вместо коронации: Новый король Норвегии Хокон VIII официально принес присягу в парламенте
1 сентября в Стортинге состоялась официальная церемония вступления на престол нового монарха Норвегии — короля Хокона VIII. В соответствии с Конституцией страны, монарх принес присягу на верность государству и народу.
В Норвегии процедура коронации была отменена еще в 1908 году. Главным юридическим и государственным актом всту…
Showing the 12 most recent of 172 posts we hold for @royalnews11. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@royalnews11 edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
30 August 2026
Most recent edit
30 August 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Бабкин Престол 2.0 @babkin_prestol · 67,510 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 21 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Королевская семья 1royalnews / Royal News” (@royalnews11), 22,334 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/royalnews11.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
