9 measurements spanning 21 days, net -32. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,182–9,228 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
27 Aug 2026, 02:24
9,191
+4
24 Aug 2026, 02:58
9,187
-13
20 Aug 2026, 07:52
9,200
-9
17 Aug 2026, 09:57
9,209
-3
14 Aug 2026, 02:35
9,212
-7
10 Aug 2026, 15:03
9,219
-3
7 Aug 2026, 07:45
9,222
-1
6 Aug 2026, 10:17
9,223
no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:57
9,223
first reading
Engagement
12 posts held, back to 31 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 31 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
30.6%
avg views ÷ 9,191 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,810
1 post measured
Reaction rate
8.90%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 12 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 20 August 2026
Posts held
12 (31 January 2026 – 20 August 2026)
Views total
2,810
Reactions total
250
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
28 Aug 2026, 15:12 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈11,400
Videos
≈629
Links
≈250
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 28 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
2m 51s
Average length
1m 26s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,839 reactions across 12 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🤯
480
26.1%
😨
410
22.3%
❤
306
16.6%
😁
191
10.4%
🥴
151
8.21%
👍
141
7.67%
🤣
64
3.48%
🔥
61
3.32%
🎉
13
0.707%
😢
10
0.544%
💯
7
0.381%
🕊
3
0.163%
💔
1
0.054%
😍
1
0.054%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,839reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 31 January 2026 to 20 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Новость, от которой у потерявшего интерес к Королевской Семье админа подскочил адреналин.
Герцог и герцогиня Сассекские вместе с детьми переезжают в Лондон «на длительный срок». Арчи и Лилибет уже зачислены в Лондонскую школу, куда начнут ходить с сентября. Подтверждено принцем Гарри, который на каком-то вчерашнем мероприятии сиял от счастья.
Место, где семья будет жить в Лондоне, не разглашается. Отдельно подчерки…
Эндрю везут домой после целого дня допроса в непрезентабельном полицейском участке Эйшема, что в часе езды от дома. Его обвиняют в передаче конфиденциальных и секретных документов своему другу Джеффри Эпштейну с 2001 по 2011 год, когда Эндрю работал торговым представителем Великобритании.
Карл lll делает вид, что был не в курсе операции по аресту брата, но выражает свою поддержку правосудию. Из участка Эндрю вчера в…
Эндрю Маунтбаттен-Виндзор арестован в свой День Рождения (66 лет), ему предъявлено обвинение в превышении должностных полномочий. Сегодня прошел обыск в бывшей резиденции Эндрю Royal Lodge и в нынешнем доме Wood Farm.
Полиция увезла его в неназванный участок, и допрашивала около 6 часов. Всего без постановления Эндрю имеют право задержать на 24 часа.
Карл lll выпустил официальное заявление, в котором выразил поддер…
Межгалактический кринж от подруги принца Эндрю, леди Виктории Харви. Раньше она тоже несла чушь, но в этот раз превзошла саму себя. Речь о файлах Джеффри Эпшейна:
- Он знал всех самых влиятельных людей. Так что, если вы были в центре внимания, и вы были влиятельным, вы были там. И, честно говоря, если ваше имя отсутствует в файлах - это значит, что вы неудачник.
- То есть, люди, чьи имена отсутствуют в файлах - неу…
После обнародования файлов Джеффри Эпшейна стало известно то, что Королевская Семья тщательно скрывает.
Эндрю связывают с убийством несовершеннолетней девушки. В опубликованных документах приводятся показания некого фигуранта дела (имя скрыто) во время допроса:
«(имя жертвы скрыто) Принц Эндрю был соучастником ее смерти, он пытал ее, а я заставил/а совершить убийство».
Это произошло в 1990х годах.
В некоторых СМИ …
И еще. Более тесная дружба связывала Джеффри Эпштейна с Норвежской принцессой Метте-Маритт. Там все на много хуже, чем с Эндрю. Тема не наша, но почитать можно 🔣ЗДЕСЬ.
И еще в опубликованных файлах, сохраненных Джеффри Эпштейном, есть три фотографии принца Эндрю, склонившегося над неизвестной женщиной непонятно для чего и непонятно где. Какие-то мастер-классы.
Некоторые моменты из переписок принца Эндрю с Джеффри Эпшейном и Гислен Максвелл в разные годы:
✅ Эпштейн предложил Эндрю встречу с «умной, красивой и заслуживающей доверия» 26-летней россиянкой, на что Эндрю ответил, что будет рад ее видеть.
✅ Из переписки с Гислен Максвелл. Эндрю использовал псевдоним (или как это назвать) «человек-невидимка». 2002 год.
Эндрю: «Поскольку планирование на выходные в честь государс…
Новая публикация файлов по делу Джеффри Эпштейна - новый слив принца Эндрю. Часть первая.
В 2011 и 2012 годах Эндрю отправлял Эпшейну Рождественские открытки с изображением своих дочерей, принцесс Юджинии и Беатрис, которым на тот момент уже было за 20.
Открытки были отправлены после официального дистанцирования Эндрю от Эпшейна после того, как в 2008 году ему было предъявлено обвинение (и он признал себя виновным)…
😨105🥴23❤9👍2
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @aristocratika. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@aristocratika named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@spain_royal named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 11 August 2026
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Бабкин Престол 2.0 @babkin_prestol · 67,237 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 21 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ВИНДЗОРЫ” (@aristocratika), 9,191 subscribers as measured 27 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/aristocratika.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
