Here’s your access link 👇 https://qxbroker.com/en/sign-up?lid=257473 Don’t wait until the best moments are already gone. Open the link, create your account, and send me a message after registration. I’ll guide you step by step and help you start with the right setup. No stress. No confusion. Just follow the instructions and join our team. Your next session starts when you decide to stop watching and take action.…

Channel
Quotex Trading
@quoteX
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · View velocity · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Domains linked from posts · Cite this entry
1,483,398subscribers
-11,597 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among the largest entries.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001897923732 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Usernames | @caixa @paytm @quoteX @utkarsh @winzo |
| Created | Between 1 November 2022 and 30 June 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 38 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/quoteX |
Topic
Gambling & betting — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 47% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 20:38 | 1,483,398 | -156 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 16:44 | 1,483,554 | -174 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 14:24 | 1,483,728 | -657 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 07:25 | 1,484,385 | -212 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 05:08 | 1,484,597 | -671 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 21:02 | 1,485,268 | -243 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 17:23 | 1,485,511 | -126 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 15:44 | 1,485,637 | -909 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 04:22 | 1,486,546 | -37 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 04:15 | 1,486,583 | -498 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 21:17 | 1,487,081 | -486 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 16:27 | 1,487,567 | -136 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 14:31 | 1,487,703 | -915 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 02:41 | 1,488,618 | -45 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 01:41 | 1,488,663 | -638 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 18:12 | 1,489,301 | -350 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 14:11 | 1,489,651 | -94 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 13:21 | 1,489,745 | -749 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 04:21 | 1,490,494 | -289 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 23:36 | 1,490,783 | first reading |
Engagement
169 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 21 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 0.432%
- avg views ÷ 1,483,398 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 6,410
- 169 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 169
- of 169 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 169 (5 August 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,083,038 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 23:51 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 5s
- Average length
- 5s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
View velocity
How fast this channel’s own posts pick up views, from re-reading them repeatedly in the hours and days after they were published rather than the single reading most entries on this register get. Coverage is early and only a small minority of channels hold it at all — a gap in this section means the post has not been re-read again yet, not that nothing happened.
Computed from 150 of this channel’s own posts over the last 30 days: across 106of this channel’s own posts with a clear reading, a typical one reaches half of its last-observed view count within 7.9 hours of being posted; a typical post has already reached 23.2% of its 24-hour view count within the first hour, and 57.7% within the first six; the median 24-hour reach across those posts is 5,605 views — 0.378% of this channel’s own subscriber count (90th percentile 7,395).
| Post | Readings | Latest reading | Curve | 24h reach | Half of last-observed views by |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| /3877112 Aug 2026, 23:06 UTC | 2under a minute – 45 minutes old | 238 viewsno reaction reading | no checkpoint reading yet | not yet at 24h | 22 minutesprovisional — final view count still climbing |
| /3877012 Aug 2026, 15:03 UTC | 1517 minutes – 8.8 hours old | 4,880 views ~no reaction reading | 60 minutes: 1,459 interp. → 3.0 hours: 2,870 → 6.0 hours: 3,960still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 2.4 hoursprovisional — final view count still climbing |
| /3876912 Aug 2026, 15:03 UTC | 1518 minutes – 8.8 hours old | 4,810 views ~no reaction reading | 60 minutes: 1,501 interp. → 3.0 hours: 2,850 → 6.0 hours: 3,920still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 2.3 hoursprovisional — final view count still climbing |
| /3876812 Aug 2026, 15:01 UTC | 1519 minutes – 8.8 hours old | 4,800 views ~no reaction reading | 60 minutes: 1,597 interp. → 3.0 hours: 2,950 → 6.0 hours: 3,930still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 2.2 hoursprovisional — final view count still climbing |
| /3876712 Aug 2026, 15:01 UTC | 1519 minutes – 8.8 hours old | 4,780 views ~no reaction reading | 60 minutes: 1,590 interp. → 3.0 hours: 2,940 → 6.0 hours: 3,930still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 2.2 hoursprovisional — final view count still climbing |
| /3876612 Aug 2026, 15:01 UTC | 1519 minutes – 8.8 hours old | 4,690 views ~no reaction reading | 60 minutes: 1,581 interp. → 3.0 hours: 2,940 → 6.0 hours: 3,890still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 2.2 hoursprovisional — final view count still climbing |
| /3876512 Aug 2026, 15:01 UTC | 1519 minutes – 8.8 hours old | 4,640 views ~no reaction reading | 60 minutes: 1,581 interp. → 3.0 hours: 2,880 → 6.0 hours: 3,880still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 2.1 hoursprovisional — final view count still climbing |
| /3876412 Aug 2026, 15:00 UTC | 1521 minutes – 8.8 hours old | 4,270 views ~no reaction reading | 60 minutes: 1,544 interp. → 3.0 hours: 2,740 → 6.0 hours: 3,590still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 2.0 hoursprovisional — final view count still climbing |
Curve is every standard checkpoint we hold a reading for (+1h, +3h, +6h, +12h, +24h, +48h, +7d after posting) — measured where a real reading landed close enough to that age, interpolated where it did not but readings on both sides let one be worked out between them. Nothing is ever extrapolated past the last real reading. Latest reading is the newest view and reaction count we hold for the post, side by side, so a gap between how views and reactions moved is visible without following it into the Observations section above. 24h reach is that one checkpoint on its own, labelled the same way. Half of last-observed viewsis the age at which a post’s view count crossed half of the highest figure we have read for it so far — an upper bound when the very first reading was already past half (we cannot see the actual crossing), and biased low while the post is still climbing, since “half of final” is dividing by a number that has not finished growing yet. Both caveats are printed inline wherever they apply, never silently dropped.
Recent posts
😇Hey bro, want more trades? Want to keep trading with us and get trade signals? Just drop me a message, and I’ll reply to each of you. VIP channel | AI assistant
Photo, posted without a caption
up
1 minutes
USD/BRL (OTC)
Photo, posted without a caption
USD/BRL (OTC) 1 minutes up 1 more deal)
up
1 minutes
USD/BRL (OTC)
Go
Showing the 12 most recent of 169 posts we hold for @quoteX. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 6 most recent of 25 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Would you like to receive a trading signals today on the @Quotex platform?) in 40 minutes @quotex subscribe so you don’t miss out!
- Yes95%
- No5%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
1 more deal?)
- Yes85%
- No15%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Would you like to receive a trading signals today on the @Quotex platform?) in 40 minutes @quotex subscribe so you don’t miss out!
- Yes94%
- No6%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Would you like to receive a trading signals today on the @Quotex platform?) in 40 minutes @quotex subscribe so you don’t miss out!
- Yes96%
- No4%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Would you like to receive a trading signals today on the @Quotex platform?) in 40 minutes @quotex subscribe so you don’t miss out!
- Yes93%
- No7%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Would you like to receive a trading signals today on the @Quotex platform?) in 40 minutes @quotex subscribe so you don’t miss out!
- Yes96%
- No4%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 169 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 12 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 56,710 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 10 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@quotex_reviews · 292,89543 postsIq Option Signals Iqoption
@iq_option_signals_iqoption1 · 165,80414 postsCurrent Affairs for All Exams
@Current_Affairs_UPSC_IBPS_SSC_Gk · 27,7664 postsHarem & Ecchi Animes
@ecchi_Animee · 24,2233 posts𝗘𝗮𝗿𝗻𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗖𝗿𝗮𝘇𝗲 ™
@Earningcraze · 112,9002 postsAbdul salam
@AbduRrrrrrrrrtt · 61 postዳኒBøŷ 𝖋𝖝 INFO📈𝐶𝑅⁷📊 🇦🇪🇬🇧✈️🛩️✈️
@bonosha12 · 1121 postgk india•General Knowledge•Rajasthank gk•Gk notes•delhi gk
@generalknowledgeindia2020 · 901 postChainsaw Man
@Man_Chainsaw · 1,4831 postUpShrink/DoShrink Updates 💜
@upshrinkupdates · 2521 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s.When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@pocket_option_signal_Quotex · 819,697#1
@realdeepwinner · 132,442#2
@QuotexSignalsBot_M1 · 60,717#3
@QuotexOTCHACK · 36,324 (as read 10 August 2026)#4
@quotexprofit_hub · 50,737#5
@ModernTradingReal · 126,301#6
@Ashipower123 · 18,287#7
@binarygurujii · 33,557#8
@PROFITABLETRADEREVER · 13,200#9
@Quotex_SuperBot · 44,237#10
@nonmtgbotsignals · 24,559#11
@sureshotskingharsh · 10,676#12
@quotextraderlucky19 · 11,330#13
@A2_Trader1 · 60,763#14
@QuotexSignalsBot_M5 · 19,021 (as read 10 August 2026)#15
@Quotex_Ao_Vivoo · 10,128#16
@milanjainofficial · 144,437#17
@tradermilanjainofficial · 15,239#18
@quotexbugsureshott · 15,299#19
@Binary_Bosss · 24,620#20
@Olymp_Trade_Signals_Quotex · 516,119#21
@QuotexxOTCQueen · 7,423#22
@blumcrypto · 15,640,039#23
@gram · 7,033,222#24
@notcoin · 9,200,677#25
@tomarket_ai · 7,240,974#26
@theyescoin · 6,198,907#27
@catapult_extreme · 9,238,991#28
@boomloudcoin · 1,758,838#29
@tonkeeper_news · 5,073,539#30
@token_1win · 3,169,397#31
@Cats_housewtf · 8,671,507#32
@TimeFarmChannel · 5,727,957#33
@toncommunitychannel · 812,552#34
@Bitget_Wallet_Announcement · 4,307,721#35
@tapswapai · 10,939,107#36
@fx_holding_community · 6,579,954#37
@theTapCoins · 3,124,024#38
@hexnio · 2,116,237#39
@trendingapps · 4,012,931#40
@LEGION_TRADERS · 5,925 (as read 10 August 2026)#41
@DRAGOLA_TRADING · 10,239#42
@ElPoP_Trading · 11,341#43
@official_BCcoin · 94,456#44
@corn_battles · 1,099,146#45
@ELBOOSTREDER · 3,951 (as read 10 August 2026)#46
@CEXIO_Announcements · 2,659,802#47
@Three_traders3 · 4,944#48
@EraOfExplorers · 758,315#49
@nonmtgbotsignalll · 20,544#50
@JOKER_TRADER_7 · 5,426#51
@sksureshoot · 10,156#52
@coincoinai · 1,909,738#53
@dexpumps · 46,654#54
@onus_globalchannel · 1,758,574#55
@BD_Trading_Bot · 13,064#56
@CryptoVIPsignalTA · 328,205#57
@Legendary_Trading_Bangladesh · 10,607#58
@deckforge_official · 2,212,185#59
@Udaantradrr · 13,190#60
@ANGEL_pocket_option · 3,379#61
@Crypto_PrePump · 112,837#62
@ftt21 · 39,568 (as read 10 August 2026)#63
@dogs · 7,510,360#64
@hamster_kombat · 22,116,787#65
@cryptowallet_news_en · 3,671,792#66
@banana_update · 1,478,718#67
@mediarussia · 1,259,054#68
@realgoats_channel · 5,057,045#69
@rockyrabbitio · 3,705,209#70
@hayzonn · 3,054,973#71
@money · 3,274,381#72
@crypto_news778 · 80,986#73
@airdrophub_great · 575,988#74
@livenews_1win · 1,649,208#75
@trending · 495,832#76
@dailycomboishere · 416,808#77
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 10 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@scotttrad · 186,994
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 11 August 2026
@BatmanTraders · 213,379
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 11 August 2026
@Olymp_Trade_Signals_Quotex · 516,119
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 10 August 2026
@pocket_option_signal_Quotex · 819,697
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 10 August 2026
@Amit_Trader_Trading_Tips · 216,813
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 11 August 2026
@Jameson_Capital · 251,152
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 10 August 2026
@Olymp_Trade_Quotex_Signals4 · 533,541
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 10 August 2026
@Trading_Crypto_Signals_Bitcoin · 1,051,337
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 10 August 2026
@quotex_official · 364,173
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 10 August 2026
@Olymp_Trade_Quotex_Signals5 · 394,392
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 10 August 2026
@EarnwithRashidChannel · 188,258
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 11 August 2026
@Forex_Trading_Bitcoin_Signals · 202,712
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 11 August 2026
@Trading_Bitcoin_Crypto_Signals7 · 254,064
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 10 August 2026
@trading_forex_quotex_binomo · 528,454
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 10 August 2026
@zertrade · 201,181
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 11 August 2026
@EasyForexPips · 246,945
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 11 August 2026
@Trading_Binomo_signals_Tips · 432,882
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 10 August 2026
@mines1winoriginal · 213,027
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 12 August 2026
@cryptoomonarch · 233,230
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 11 August 2026
@goldsnipers11 · 190,548
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 11 August 2026
@newscoins · 331,521
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 11 August 2026
@legend_of_trading · 163,372
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 12 August 2026
@Crypto_Pump_Exclusive_Signals · 165,145
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 12 August 2026
@bengoldtrader · 351,224
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 10 August 2026
This channel appears in 30 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Domains linked from posts
One domainthis channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Quotex Trading” (@quoteX), 1,483,398 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/quoteX.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.