π CHALLENGE START Balance: $8,120 USD Target: $25,000 Day 2 of 4. Let's go

Channel
Scott Reyes | Trade your futureπ
@scotttrad
On this record: Topic Β· Growth Β· Engagement Β· What this channel posts Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Citations Β· Telegram's recommendations Β· Cite this entry
186,994subscribers
+1,131 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 100,000β316,228.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002174497780 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @scotttrad |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024β estimated from Telegramβs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/scotttrad |
Topic
Crypto & trading β a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channelβs own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a modelβs judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured β it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 20:23 | 186,994 | +1,812 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 16:55 | 185,182 | +325 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 13:22 | 184,857 | -683 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 16:36 | 185,540 | -315 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 15:23 | 185,855 | -4 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:05 | 185,859 | -4 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:45 | 185,863 | first reading |
Engagement
132 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pagesof Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR Β· 30 days
- 6.30%
- avg views Γ· 186,994 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 11,800
- 132 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 1.09%
- reactions Γ· views Β· ER floor
- Posts in window
- 132
- of 132 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) Γ· viewsβ note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramβs public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 131 of 132 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days Β· latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 132 (6 August 2026 β 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,553,901 |
| Reactions total | 17,007 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface β not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 18:01 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than βcorrectingβ the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form β 8.12K, 3.7M β so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded β read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 8s
- Average length
- 8s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel β not this channelβs whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramβs own rounded chrome, so it carries no β mark.
Reaction mix
17,007 reactions across 131 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| β€ | 3,462 | 20.4% | |
| π€ | 3,444 | 20.3% | |
| π | 3,399 | 20.0% | |
| π₯ | 3,390 | 19.9% | |
| π | 3,312 | 19.5% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 131 of the 132 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 17,007reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 132 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
A BIG TRADING SESSION WILL BEGIN IN 30 MINUTES IN THIS CHANNEL π Absolutely anyone can participate, but for a guaranteed profit of $200, I recommend following a few simple steps: π΄Top up your balance with at least $100 (but remember, the larger your initial balance, the greater your profit) πΈ π΄Follow the signals in our group and repeat them exactly as written β BinoDex If you have any questions, don't hesitate toβ¦
π€19β€18π16π14π₯13
Video message, posted without a caption
π₯18β€17π17π€17π16
π After another marathon session this afternoon, I decided to switch the charts for a yacht and enjoy a few hours on the water This is one of the things I love about trading - you can work from almost anywhere. Even from the yacht, I can stay connected to the market and keep working with my clients β οΈ Right now I still have 3 spots available for personal trading. I keep the number limited because I work with everyβ¦
π37π€30π25π₯21
Video message, posted without a caption
β€37π€35π₯34π32π2
βοΈ Another trading session of the $500 β‘οΈ $25,000 marathon is DONE We're officially on our way, and another session is already behind us π The goal is simple: $500 to $25,000 in 4 days. And yes, anyone can participate You don't need to be an experienced trader or have a huge account to join. If you want to take part, just message me directly and I'll explain how to get started β οΈ Don't wait for the best moment tβ¦
π46π₯32π€31β€20π1
π SESSION REPORT πͺ 2/3 profitable trades: +4,004$ Guys, you need to understand that this is a test session for you - all the main trading and analysis takes place in your personal work with me or in a closed channel! β‘οΈSession = demonstration of my honesty! βοΈIf you have any questions or want to trade more seriously, please write to me! βοΈ @ScottTraderRRR
π€35π32π25β€21
π DAY RESULT Balance: $8,120 USD Day 2 of 4 complete
β€32π€27π24π₯24π17
β 2548$
π39π31π€29β€27
βΉοΈ 1 min πΈ 1300$ trade SELL NOW π½
π€33π32π₯28β€25
β 2156$
π€35β€31π22π₯22
βΉοΈ 1 min πΈ 1100$ trade SELL NOW π½
β€26π€26π23π23π₯23
Showing the 12 most recent of 132 posts we hold for @scotttrad. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank β 1,086,552 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below β republished posts weigh more than named mentions β and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channelβs name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page β a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegramβs own answer, not this registerβs.When this register asks Telegramβs API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it β never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegramβs; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@quoteX Β· 1,483,398#1
@Ashipower123 Β· 18,287#2
@pocket_option_signal_Quotex Β· 819,697#3
@binarygurujii Β· 33,557#4
@ntrade_official_channel Β· 54,317#5
@signalskami Β· 6,223#6
@milanjainofficial Β· 144,437#7
@QuotexOTCHACK Β· 36,342 (as read 11 August 2026)#8
@dashatrade Β· 8,881#9
@artemisposignals Β· 6,315#10
@sksureshoot Β· 10,156#11
@A2_Trader1 Β· 60,763#12
@Udaantradrr Β· 13,190#13
@quotextraderlucky19 Β· 11,330#14
@binwil Β· 6,060 (as read 11 August 2026)#15
@Amit_Trader_Trading_Tips Β· 216,813#16
@Laxmi_trader_official Β· 10,257#17
@julia_signal Β· 6,866#18
@Pocket_Option_Signal_OTC_market Β· 14,083#19
@realdeepwinner Β· 132,442#20
@PROFITABLETRADEREVER Β· 13,200#21
@QuotexSignalsBot_M1 Β· 60,717#22
@Quotex_Ao_Vivoo Β· 10,128#23
@QuotexxOTCQueen Β· 7,423#24
@nonmtgbotsignals Β· 24,559#25
@Qoutexfreesignal1 Β· 24,807#26
@tradecharts777 Β· 136,729#27
@TradingTrustOfficial Β· 3,021#28
@pocketoptionpromocodes Β· 1,732#29
@BD_Trading_Bot Β· 13,064#30
@Dx_Official_Trading Β· 17,201#31
@aliwintraderpoketoption Β· 6,668#32
@Quotexoi9 Β· 16,126#33
@QuotexBugSignal0 Β· 11,690#34
@beezy_gang Β· 15,604#35
@aletrading Β· 138,890#36
@viccmac Β· 6,359#37
@CandleSniperX Β· 2,832 (as read 11 August 2026)#38
@MR_CANDLESTICKCHANNEL Β· 10,821#39
@Rakshit_trader Β· 29,607#40
@DheeraTrading Β· 2,443#41
@quotextradingbyajay Β· 276 (as read 11 August 2026)#42
@Bullishkingsignals Β· 6,944#43
@EyadTraderBot2 Β· 13,486#44
@sureshotskingharsh Β· 10,676#45
@forexsignalsAlpha Β· 667#46
@POCKET5MIN Β· 3,941#47
@tradermilanjainofficial Β· 15,239#48
@quotexprofit_hub Β· 50,737#49
@nickstrader Β· 24,065#50
@realbinaryoptionss Β· 10,580#51
@Rani_Quotex Β· 33,608#52
@cryptocapitalgl Β· 47,114#53
@quotexbugsureshott Β· 15,299#54
@LEGION_TRADERS Β· 5,942 (as read 11 August 2026)#55
@CryptoVIPsignalTA Β· 328,205#56
@DRAGOLA_TRADING Β· 10,239#57
@ElPoP_Trading Β· 11,341#58
@powerprincetraderr Β· 2,459#59
@Quotex_SuperBot Β· 44,237#60
@trade_with_lea Β· 10,565#61
@premumtrade2 Β· 686#62
@QuotexSignalsBot_M5 Β· 19,015 (as read 11 August 2026)#63
@Binaryoptionssk Β· 7,127 (as read 11 August 2026)#64
@Crypto_PrePump Β· 112,837#65
@test_signals_charlotte Β· 1,344 (as read 11 August 2026)#66
@a2traderbinolla Β· 18,069#67
@AlfadaiyChannel Β· 5,590 (as read 11 August 2026)#68
Read from Telegramβs recommendation API, most recently 11 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register β how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegramβs recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly β each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone elseβs query is independent of having been queried itself.
@Trading_Crypto_Signals_Bitcoin Β· 1,051,337
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 54 here β alongside 53 others β read 10 August 2026
@Forex_Trading_Bitcoin_Signals Β· 202,712
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 62 here β alongside 61 others β read 11 August 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegramβs list for THAT channel, not this one β see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βScott Reyes | Trade your futureπβ (@scotttrad), 186,994 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/scotttrad.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.