Photo, posted without a caption

Channel
@Binary_Bosss
@Binary_Bosss
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
23,791subscribers
-889 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002111193817 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Binary_Bosss |
| Description | Welcome To Quotex Bot Join Our All Trading Channel ✅ https://t.me/addlist/1CR5fmGGJ3A0ODNh Support ID @Binary_Bro |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 33 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 25 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Binary_Bosss |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 18 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 83% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Sept 2026, 08:20 | 23,791 | +693 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 06:58 | 23,098 | -32 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 06:19 | 23,130 | -20 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 16:37 | 23,150 | -38 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 20:57 | 23,188 | -71 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 07:15 | 23,259 | -84 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 00:18 | 23,343 | -47 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 17:40 | 23,390 | -9 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 13:03 | 23,399 | -49 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 16:34 | 23,448 | -189 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 13:53 | 23,637 | -463 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 13:14 | 24,100 | -270 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 13:16 | 24,370 | -31 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 10:45 | 24,401 | -14 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 12:18 | 24,415 | -4 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 12:53 | 24,419 | -43 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 13:42 | 24,462 | -47 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 13:34 | 24,509 | +495 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 20:18 | 24,014 | -41 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 10:35 | 24,055 | first reading |
Engagement
1,041 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 60 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 0.049%
- avg views ÷ 23,791 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 11.7
- 280 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 4.55%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 280
- of 1,041 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 5 of 280 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 1,041 (7 August 2026 – 28 September 2026) |
| Views total | 3,279 |
| Reactions total | 2 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 28 Sept 2026, 01:27 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈205,000
- Links
- ≈302,000
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 28 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
38 reactions across 22 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 22 | 57.9% | |
| 🕊 | 7 | 18.4% | |
| 🔥 | 4 | 10.5% | |
| 🏆 | 2 | 5.26% | |
| 💯 | 2 | 5.26% | |
| 🎉 | 1 | 2.63% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 28 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 38 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 7 August 2026 to 28 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
===== SIGNAL ===== 📊 USDJPY 🕓 07:26 ⏳ M1 🟢 CALL 🎯 157.734 JOIN OUR VIP AND GET NEW BOT https://market-qx.pro/?lid=577049
===== PLACAR ===== 00:07 - BRLUSD-OTCq - PUT ️ ✅ 00:14 - BRLUSD-OTCq - CALL️ ✖ 00:16 - BRLUSD-OTCq - PUT ️ ✅ 00:26 - BRLUSD-OTCq - CALL️ ✅1 00:31 - BRLUSD-OTCq - CALL️ ✅ 00:45 - BRLUSD-OTCq - PUT ️ ✅ 00:47 - BRLUSD-OTCq - CALL️ ✅ 00:56 - BRLUSD-OTCq - PUT ️ ✅ 00:58 - BRLUSD-OTCq - PUT ️ ✅1 01:15 - USDARS-OTCq - PUT ️ ✅ 01:29 - BRLUSD-OTCq - CALL️ ✅1 01:49 - USDARS-OTCq - CALL…
Photo, posted without a caption
===== RESULT ===== 📊 EURUSD 🕓 06:43 ✖️ HIT MG1 Win: 34 | Loss: 8 (81%) Current Pair: 5x3 (63%) JOIN OUR VIP AND GET NEW BOT https://market-qx.pro/?lid=577049
Photo, posted without a caption
===== SIGNAL ===== 📊 EURUSD 🕓 06:43 ⏳ M1 🔴 PUT 🎯 1.13811 JOIN OUR VIP AND GET NEW BOT https://market-qx.pro/?lid=577049
Photo, posted without a caption
===== RESULT ===== 📊 USDJPY 🕓 06:17 ✖️ HIT MG1 Win: 34 | Loss: 7 (83%) Current Pair: 9x2 (82%) JOIN OUR VIP AND GET NEW BOT https://market-qx.pro/?lid=577049
Photo, posted without a caption
===== SIGNAL ===== 📊 USDJPY 🕓 06:17 ⏳ M1 🔴 PUT 🎯 157.62 JOIN OUR VIP AND GET NEW BOT https://market-qx.pro/?lid=577049
Photo, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 1,041 posts we hold for @Binary_Bosss. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@BD_Trading_Bot · 14,443#1
@Quotex_SuperBot · 43,080#2
@Secret_Quotex_Bot · 13,138#3
@quotexnomtgbot · 19,492#4
@Quotex_Ao_Vivoo · 10,152#5
@nonmtgbotsignals · 25,185#6
@Legendary_Trading_Bangladesh · 10,937#7
@QuotexSignalsBot_M1 · 59,830#8
@QuantumSignalNet · 12,644#9
@secret_solutionYT · 17,653#10
@Trading_MegaBot · 10,822#11
@nonmtglive · 12,476#12
@Quote_XBinaryBoT · 23,366#13
@secretquotex · 11,235#14
@Quotex_Primium_Signals · 8,940#15
@quoteX · 1,412,100#16
@realdeepwinner · 131,031#17
@DRAGOLA_TRADING · 9,632#18
@M1_Quotex_Ao_Vivo · 4,667#19
@QuotexSignalsBot_M5 · 18,964#20
@JuniorEMON02 · 5,062#21
@GentleBinary_OfficialBD · 20,549#22
@EyadTraderBot2 · 13,646#23
@EyadTraderBot1 · 8,250#24
@quotextraderofficial · 3,202#25
@quotextraderlucky19 · 11,860#26
@EyadTraderBot · 21,459#27
@Dx_Official_Trading · 14,654#28
@binarygurujii · 35,751#29
@BinaryGuruTrading · 9,613#30
@nonmtgquotexrobot · 2,096#31
@nonmtgkingarea · 2,184#32
@TWA_NOMTG_CRACKER · 2,608#33
@Hello_Quotex · 12,747#34
@PROFITABLETRADEREVER · 13,621#35
@Ashipower123 · 18,279#36
@dreamssignalss · 16#37
@sitbofficial · 12,022#38
@aletrading · 124,781#39
@stbpublic · 8,176#40
@secret_solution_YT · 21,540#41
@LEGION_TRADERS · 6,047#42
@ElPoP_Trading · 11,435#43
@tanmayoption · 10,122#44
@MTB_SIGNALS · 4,097#45
@Three_traders3 · 4,929#46
@Yoo_Binary_Trading · 5,724#47
@JOKER_TRADER_7 · 5,499#48
@ELBOOSTREDER · 4,029#49
@MORTAR_TRADING · 3,528#50
@KING_OF_OTC_q · 20,167#51
@sksureshoot · 10,468#52
@ANGEL_pocket_option · 3,287#53
@Qxsupportt · 2,613#54
@Binaryoptionssk · 6,966#55
@TWA_NONMTG_FUTURE · 1,232#56
@MHBSIGNAL · 91,493#57
@quotexprofit_hub · 51,013#58
@hemokhaled · 3,458#59
@M1Rtrading · 26,793#60
@binollatradings · 2,877#61
@FireTradingBD · 5,045#62
@bugcompundgrup · 12,131#63
@Areb7_tradingchannel · 10,030#64
@ftt21 · 23,021 (as read 19 September 2026)#65
@DOAA_HASSAN_TRADER · 20,566#66
@viccmac · 6,502#67
@YOO_TRADING_BANGLADESH · 5,176#68
@SeMO20240 · 5,427#69
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 19 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@Quotex_SuperBot · 43,080
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 28 August 2026
@aletrading · 124,781
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 13 August 2026
@Olymp_Trade_Quotex_Signals7 · 23,637
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 18 September 2026
@QuotexSignalsBot_M1 · 59,830
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 22 August 2026
@dreamssignalss · 16
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 24 August 2026
@Quote_XBinaryBoT · 23,366
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 18 September 2026
@nonmtgbotsignals · 25,185
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 15 September 2026
@GentleBinary_OfficialBD · 20,549
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 27 September 2026
@quoteX · 1,412,100
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 10 August 2026
@Forex_Trading_Bitcoin_Signals · 198,762
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 11 August 2026
@Olymp_Trade_Quotex_Signals5 · 385,572
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 10 August 2026
@Amit_Trader_Trading_Tips · 213,943
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 11 August 2026
@Olymp_Trade_Signals_Quotex · 491,541
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 10 August 2026
@senales_trading_gratis_quotex · 49,080
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 2 September 2026
@senales_trading_quotex_forex1 · 194,167
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 27 August 2026
@EyadTraderBot · 21,459
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 23 September 2026
@ForexFX_Signals_Crypto_Currency · 21,174
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 24 September 2026
@iq_options_free_binary_signals1 · 27,846
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 9 September 2026
@secret_solution_YT · 21,540
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 23 September 2026
@MHBSIGNAL · 91,493
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 20 August 2026
@RJTradingKing24 · 30,434
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 6 September 2026
@Binolla_Free_Trade_Binary_Signal · 58,412
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 24 August 2026
@binarygurujii · 35,751
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 3 September 2026
@professortradings · 36,648
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 24 August 2026
This channel appears in 28 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“@Binary_Bosss” (@Binary_Bosss), 23,791 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Binary_Bosss.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.