Gambling & betting — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 80% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Views per post sit far below this size band
158 average views per post against 1,051,337 subscribers — an engagement rate of 0.015%. Across the 408 registered channels in the same cohort — 1,000,322–15,640,039 subscribers — the middle half sit between 0.956% and 8.21%, with a median of 2.81%.
What this was computed from
Window
30 days (13 July 2026 – 12 August 2026)
Posts measured
519 of 519 published in the window (519 exact, 0 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled
81,918
Mature posts only
0.018% over 236 posts read at least 24h after publication
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or below the 1st percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — below it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal.A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_low, last confirmed 12 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Growth
7 measurements spanning 5 days, net +13,532. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,034,736–1,053,502 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 19:46
1,051,337
+8,127
11 Aug 2026, 17:11
1,043,210
+6,309
10 Aug 2026, 17:31
1,036,901
-310
9 Aug 2026, 17:52
1,037,211
-295
8 Aug 2026, 14:45
1,037,506
-236
7 Aug 2026, 16:07
1,037,742
-63
7 Aug 2026, 11:18
1,037,805
first reading
Engagement
519 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
0.015%
avg views ÷ 1,051,337 subscribers
Avg views / post
160
519 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
519
of 519 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held
519 (7 August 2026 – 12 August 2026)
Views total
82,887
Reactions total
—
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
13 Aug 2026, 00:51 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
6m 48s
Average length
26s
Measured directly from 16 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
View velocity
How fast this channel’s own posts pick up views, from re-reading them repeatedly in the hours and days after they were published rather than the single reading most entries on this register get. Coverage is early and only a small minority of channels hold it at all — a gap in this section means the post has not been re-read again yet, not that nothing happened.
Computed from 496 of this channel’s own posts over the last 30 days (57 of the 24-hour readings behind this are interpolated, not measured directly): across 231of this channel’s own posts with a clear reading, a typical one reaches half of its last-observed view count within 2.2 hours of being posted; a typical post has already reached 36.9% of its 24-hour view count within the first hour, and 78.4% within the first six; the median 24-hour reach across those posts is 174 views — 0.017% of this channel’s own subscriber count (90th percentile 205).
8 most recently posted, with a view-velocity reading
60 minutes: 24 interp. → 3.0 hours: 55 interp. → 6.0 hours: 83still climbing at last reading
not yet at 24h
2.5 hoursprovisional — final view count still climbing
Curve is every standard checkpoint we hold a reading for (+1h, +3h, +6h, +12h, +24h, +48h, +7d after posting) — measured where a real reading landed close enough to that age, interpolated where it did not but readings on both sides let one be worked out between them. Nothing is ever extrapolated past the last real reading. Latest reading is the newest view and reaction count we hold for the post, side by side, so a gap between how views and reactions moved is visible without following it into the Observations section above. 24h reach is that one checkpoint on its own, labelled the same way. Half of last-observed viewsis the age at which a post’s view count crossed half of the highest figure we have read for it so far — an upper bound when the very first reading was already past half (we cannot see the actual crossing), and biased low while the post is still climbing, since “half of final” is dividing by a number that has not finished growing yet. Both caveats are printed inline wherever they apply, never silently dropped.
❗️ AI CHART ANALYSIS BOT
Just send a screenshot or photo of any chart, and our AI will analyze it in seconds!
✅ Take a screenshot of the chart
✅ Send it to the bot
✅ Get a ready-made signal with a forecast
✅ Execute — and earn
No complicated analysis. No wasted time.
🔥 Want access?
👉 Send me the message: "AI BOT": @advik_trade_supp
❗️ AI CHART ANALYSIS BOT
Just send a screenshot or photo of any chart, and our AI will analyze it in seconds!
✅ Take a screenshot of the chart
✅ Send it to the bot
✅ Get a ready-made signal with a forecast
✅ Execute — and earn
No complicated analysis. No wasted time.
🔥 Want access?
👉 Send me the message: "AI BOT": @advik_trade_supp
👑JOIN OUR CHANNEL AND EARN 3000 BUCKS DAILY! 👑
Wait until tomorrow to earn or join the VIP and earn right now!. Do everything I say and make money with us.
✅✅✅✅✅✅✅✅✅✅✅✅
THE PROCESS OF JOINING THE VIP CHANNEL IS FREE
1⃣ SIMPLY CREATE YOUR ACCOUNT ON QUOTEX USING THE SECURE LINK: 👇👇
✅ REGISTER NOW
✅ REGISTER NOW
✅ REGISTER NOW
2⃣ DEPOSIT AT LEAST 50$ TO YOUR ACCOUNT
3⃣ SEND YOUR TRADER ID TO @advik_trade_supp
AND…
💪💪💪 JOIN MY FREE VIP GROUP AND TAKE YOUR TRADING TO THE NEXT LEVEL!
✅ Access 3 exclusive trading sessions with VIP signals
✅ Get direct, personal support from me
✅ Understand and fix your mistakes with detailed analysis
✅ Achieve guaranteed profit potential
✅ Enjoy the opportunity for daily income
🔥 I’ll guide you step-by-step — you’re never alone in this journey. Connect with me: @advik_trade_supp
✅✅✅ Ready to st…
🔥🔥🔥 YOUR FEEDBACK, TODAY MOTIVATION FOR OTHERS
WHILE YOU WERE THINKING, THEY WERE ALREADY EARNING! DON'T WASTE YOUR TIME, WRITE TO ME NOW!
Read more reviews 👉👉 here 🔥
👉 If you want to join and become one of those lucky screenshot winners, then follow this quick instruction.
1⃣ SIMPLY CREATE YOUR ACCOUNT ON QUOTEX USING THE SECURE LINK ➡ REGISTRATION LINK ⬅️
2⃣ DEPOSIT AT LEAST 50$ TO YOUR ACCOUNT
3⃣ SEND YOUR TRA…
🔝🔝3RD SESSION – CLOSED! 👌
🤝Profit: 10/10
💰Balance: 50$ 👉 $1070,95
🏆 Another day closed with success! 🚀
🫵 Huge thanks for all your feedback — I’ll be sharing the results from everyone who sent them in very soon! 🤗
Wishing you an awesome evening, friends! 💪💪💪💪
💬 DM me anytime 👉 @advik_trade_supp
Showing the 12 most recent of 519 posts we hold for @Trading_Crypto_Signals_Bitcoin. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s.When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 10 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Forex Trading Bitcoin Signals @Forex_Trading_Bitcoin_Signals · 202,712 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 11 August 2026
Trading Bitcoin Crypto Signals @Trading_Bitcoin_Crypto_Signals7 · 254,064 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 10 August 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Domains linked from posts
2 domainsthis channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Trading Crypto Bitcoin Signals” (@Trading_Crypto_Signals_Bitcoin), 1,051,337 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Trading_Crypto_Signals_Bitcoin.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.