Crypto & trading โ a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channelโs own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 41% confidence. This is a modelโs judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured โ it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
40 measurements spanning 88 days, net -28,098. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between โ snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean โno change observedโ, never โinterpolatedโ.
Measurement log โ every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 40
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
3 Nov 2026, 05:27
115,954
no change
3 Nov 2026, 05:17
115,954
+115,936
27 Oct 2026, 07:37
18
+4
19 Oct 2026, 09:59
14
+6
12 Oct 2026, 20:27
8
-135,710
8 Oct 2026, 08:55
135,718
+1,129
3 Oct 2026, 20:39
134,589
-11,792
25 Sept 2026, 00:17
146,381
-9,889
17 Sept 2026, 05:19
156,270
-464
15 Sept 2026, 05:21
156,734
-499
13 Sept 2026, 13:00
157,233
-1,025
11 Sept 2026, 14:38
158,258
+10,893
8 Sept 2026, 20:59
147,365
-2,796
5 Sept 2026, 11:01
150,161
-2,246
3 Sept 2026, 16:17
152,407
-1,155
2 Sept 2026, 07:13
153,562
-787
1 Sept 2026, 04:34
154,349
+2,260
31 Aug 2026, 03:42
152,089
+3,113
30 Aug 2026, 04:35
148,976
-1,066
29 Aug 2026, 02:15
150,042
first reading
Engagement
1,871 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 โ the reader has reached the start of this channelโs public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 130 pages of Telegramโs post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR ยท 30 days
3.71%
avg views รท 115,954 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,300
72 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.84%
reactions รท views ยท ER floor
Posts in window
76
of 1,871 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) รท views โ note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramโs public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days ยท latest post in window 8 October 2026
Posts held
1,871 (6 August 2026 โ 8 October 2026)
Views total
309,824
Reactions total
11,898
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface โ not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Oct 2026, 11:28 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than โcorrectingโ the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form โ 8.12K, 3.7M โ so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded โ read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
29m 33s
Average length
16s
Measured directly from 109 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel โ not this channelโs whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramโs own rounded chrome, so it carries no โ mark.
Reaction mix
156,424 reactions across 984 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 17.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
โค
26,794
17.1%
๐
22,334
14.3%
๐ฅ
21,648
13.8%
๐คฉ
21,341
13.6%
๐
21,275
13.6%
๐ฅฐ
11,478
7.34%
โคโ๐ฅ
10,379
6.64%
๐
10,285
6.58%
๐ฏ
10,073
6.44%
๐
450
0.288%
๐
196
0.125%
โก
48
0.031%
๐
39
0.025%
๐
26
0.017%
๐
24
0.015%
๐ค
20
0.013%
๐
8
0.005%
๐ค
6
0.004%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ ๐ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ 4.34K, 1.2M โ so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 986 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโs own count on each post โ not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ those same posts carry 156,424 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 29 August 2026 to 8 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
122
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 990 we hold a reading for ยท 0.4%
Most on one post
86
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars โ bought with money โ on a post by @mebadshahtrader51. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold for this entry (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 29 August 2026 to 8 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegramโs short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
The shares total 110%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Everyone, Iโd like your honest opinion.
Should I give this channel back to him or not?
He has caused significant losses for many people, and I personally suffered losses because of him as well.
Please vote based on your honest opinion:
๐ด Negative Reaction โ If you think I should give the channel back to him.
๐ข Positive Reaction โ If you think I should NOT give the channel back to him.
Your honest feedback matteโฆ
๐ October is here. New opportunities await.
https://equlix.com/en/signup?lid=5343137
Use bonus code: OctBoost ๐
Claim your 99% Bonus and power up your trading. ๐
Dm Here โ @Mj_trader
Trade smarter. Grow faster. โก๏ธ
๐ฏ
Showing the 12 most recent of 1,871 posts we hold for @mebadshahtrader51. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A pollโs figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 110%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The shares total 113%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only โ there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each optionโs share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each optionโs own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 29 August 2026 to 8 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind โ an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results โ and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason โ naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides โ the โNamed by N registered channelsโ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegramโs own answer, not this registerโs. When this register asks Telegramโs API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it โ never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegramโs; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegramโs recommendation API, most recently 13 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register โ how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegramโs recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly โ each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone elseโs query is independent of having been queried itself.
A2 Trader Binolla @a2traderbinollaofficial ยท 49,029 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 61 here โ alongside 60 others โ read 11 September 2026
A2 Trader @A2_Trader1 ยท 64,404 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 60 here โ alongside 59 others โ read 22 August 2026
Nichk Trader @nickstrader ยท 3 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 60 here โ alongside 59 others โ read 19 September 2026
Scott Reyes | Trade your future๐ @scotttrad ยท 224,623 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 68 here โ alongside 67 others โ read 11 August 2026
Amit Trader | Trading Tips @Amit_Trader_Trading_Tips ยท 218,457 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 64 here โ alongside 63 others โ read 11 August 2026
Quotex Guru๐ฏ @binarygurujii ยท 36,352 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 64 here โ alongside 63 others โ read 3 September 2026
Technical Mind Trade @tecnicalmindtrade ยท 28,454 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 47 here โ alongside 46 others โ read 7 September 2026
TRADING LEGEND QTX @realdeepwinner ยท 127,894 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 66 here โ alongside 65 others โ read 13 August 2026
QUOTEX BUG SURESHOT @quotexprofit_hub ยท 49,789 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 63 here โ alongside 62 others โ read 25 August 2026
TRADING LEGEND F&O @legend_of_trading ยท 158,537 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 65 here โ alongside 64 others โ read 12 August 2026
Rani Quotex @Rani_Quotex ยท 29,692 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 65 here โ alongside 64 others โ read 9 September 2026
Modern Trading ๐งฟ @ModernTradingReal ยท 125,838 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 63 here โ alongside 62 others โ read 13 August 2026
Perfect Trader ๐ฅ @perfecttraderpublic ยท 19,777 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 56 here โ alongside 55 others โ read 27 September 2026
๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐ @M1Rtrading ยท 23,011 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 63 here โ alongside 62 others โ read 8 September 2026
Quotex Professor Trading @professortradings ยท 63,580 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 69 here โ alongside 68 others โ read 24 August 2026
Earn with Rashid @EarnwithRashidChannel ยท 181,136 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 60 here โ alongside 59 others โ read 11 August 2026
Olymp Trade Binary Free Signals @Olymp_Trade_Signals_Free_Binary ยท 37,516 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 68 here โ alongside 67 others โ read 4 September 2026
Trade With Zer @quoteX ยท 179,977 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 77 here โ alongside 76 others โ read 10 August 2026
Trading Quotex Signals @Trading_Forex_Signals_Quotex ยท 39,134 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 50 here โ alongside 49 others โ read 30 August 2026
Amit Trader | Trading Signals @Amit_Trading_Signals ยท 54,211 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 22 here โ alongside 21 others โ read 23 August 2026
Quotex Official Channel @quotex_official ยท 377,169 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 64 here โ alongside 63 others โ read 10 August 2026
๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐ฐ @aayat_traders ยท 10,298 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 63 here โ alongside 62 others โ read 5 October 2026
Rakshit Trader @Rakshit_trader ยท 29,021 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 59 here โ alongside 58 others โ read 5 September 2026
Ale Trader - Signals FREE ๐๐ฐ @aletrading ยท 111,942 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 67 here โ alongside 66 others โ read 13 August 2026
This channel appears in 48 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegramโs list for THAT channel, not this one โ see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 November 2026 โ this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
โBADSHA TRADER COMMUNITY ๐โ (@mebadshahtrader51), 115,954 subscribers as measured 3 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mebadshahtrader51.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.