Channel
@yabloko_press
On this record: Topic · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Referenced elsewhere · Cite this entry
35,624subscribers
+31,601 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001092663584 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @yabloko_press |
| Created | 9 March 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/yabloko_press |
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 3 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 22:13 | 35,624 | +6 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 20:12 | 35,618 | +298 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 21:32 | 35,320 | +24,869 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 21:51 | 10,451 | +6,253 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 14:42 | 4,198 | +175 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 04:19 | 4,023 | no change |
| 5 Aug 2026, 22:10 | 4,023 | first reading |
68 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 12 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 68 (29 July 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,560,230 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 20:56 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
⚡️ТАСС переврал решение Верховного суда и приписал «Яблоку» получение из-за рубежа около 3 млн рублей. На самом деле в решении суда говорится совсем другое: деньги из иностранных источников получали контрагенты партии, а не сама партия. Причём в решении суда не уточняется, о каких именно контрагентах идёт речь Так или иначе, среди установленных законом оснований для отмены регистрации федерального списка нет такого …
❗️Верховный Суд направил «Яблоку» мотивированное решение о снятии федерального списка партии с выборов в Госдуму по иску «Родины». Формальными основаниями стали рублевые пожертвования от россиян, получавших деньги из-за рубежа, публикации в поддержку «Яблока» в заблокированных и ограниченных в России соцсетях, а также предполагаемые нарушения авторских прав. Среди них — использование строк «Пусть всегда будет солнце…
⚡️Друзья! Впервые в истории суд решил снять «Яблоко» с выборов в Думу. Единственную партию за мир и свободу. Решение суда не вступило в силу! Мы его обжалуем и будем бороться. Я хочу сказать огромное спасибо всем, кто пришел поддержать нас в суде. Следил за заседанием, переживал за нас и надеялся на лучшее. Мы чувствуем вашу поддержку. Она бесценна! За этот месяц мы увидели тысячи искренних и неравнодушных молодых…
❗️Защита Льва Шлосберга требует исключить недопустимое доказательство мотива политической ненависти и назначить комплексную психолого-политологическую экспертизу 11 августа в Псковском городском суде после шестидневного перерыва возобновилось рассмотрение по существу объединенного уголовного дела Льва Шлосберга. Политика обвиняют по двум статьям Уголовного кодекса — ч. 2 ст. 207.3 УК РФ («фейки об армии») — из-за р…
В понедельник, 10 августа Петроградский районный суд оставил в силе постановление мирового суда о привлечении к ответственности по статье 13.15 КоАП координатора Федерального Политического комитета «Яблока» и экс-лидера фракции в Законодательном Собрании Санкт-Петербурга Александра Шишлова. ❗️Любопытный факт: постановление о привлечении Шишлова к ответственности по статье о якобы «злоупотреблении свободой СМИ» был…
Брифинг лидера «Яблока» Николая Рыбакова на ступенях Верховного суда после вынесения решения о снятии партии с выборов.
«Яблоко» идет на эти выборы с программой «За мир и свободу!». Мы выступаем за прекращение огня, дипломатию и достижение мира, за недопущение ядерной войны. Мы хотим, чтобы Россия была свободна от страха и политических репрессий, чтобы в нашей стране ценили человеческую жизнь, уважали достоинство и права человека. Наша цель — процветающая демократическая Россия. У нас очень простая, короткая и абсолютно ясная програм…
⚡️ Верховный суд удовлетворил иск партии «Родина» и отменил регистрацию федерального списка кандидатов партии «Яблоко» на выборах депутатов Государственной Думы. Решение будет обжаловано.
Перед тем как Верховный суд удалился для вынесения решения, председатель «Яблока» Николай Рыбаков обратился к сторонникам партии: «Как бы ни закончилось рассмотрение этого дела, впереди у нас долгий путь к будущему России, и мы пройдем его вместе с вами. Самое главное — чтобы люди перестали убивать друг друга».
Обстановка у Верховного суда в конце прений по иску «Родины» о снятии «Яблока» с выборов в Госдуму. Несколько юношей и девушек раздают всем желающим питьевую воду и организуют утилизацию мусора. Фото: «Слово защите»
Адвокат «Яблока» Гаджи Алиев отверг обвинения в получении партией иностранного финансирования. По его словам, письмо Росфинмониторинга, которое в суд представил ЦИК, не относится к предмету рассматриваемого спора и не является доказательством по делу. Адвокат заявил, что представитель ЦИК исказил содержание справки: иностранные средства поступали не партии, а отдельным гражданам России. Из указанной в документе суммы…
Николай Рыбаков: — Мы работаем в России в сложных условиях, учитывая нашу политическую позицию. Однако мы эту позицию не скрываем. Это наше видение интересов страны и ее будущего. Для нас принципиально оставаться и работать в стране, сохранять связь с людьми, которые живут здесь и ради которых мы делаем своё дело. Мы сделаем все для того, чтобы Россия стала процветающим демократическим государством. Прошу отклонить …
Showing the 12 most recent of 68 posts we hold for @yabloko_press. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 297 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 115 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.
Wikipedia
One Wikipedia article names this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Пресс-служба Яблока” (@yabloko_press), 35,624 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/yabloko_press.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.