Правозащитный проект. Работаем в делах, которые рассматривают за закрытыми дверями, и помогаем невиновным в судах.
Сайт: https://dept.one
Юридическая помощь: @deptonebot
Обратиться к нам: [email protected]
Пресса и сотрудничество: @spiritbear
Created
19 July 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
61 measurements spanning 95 days, net -2,558. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 49,442–52,831 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 61
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
9 Nov 2026, 09:38
49,833
-1
8 Nov 2026, 01:21
49,834
-8
6 Nov 2026, 20:54
49,842
+9
5 Nov 2026, 19:40
49,833
-6
4 Nov 2026, 20:46
49,839
-9
3 Nov 2026, 18:07
49,848
-4
2 Nov 2026, 19:25
49,852
-13
1 Nov 2026, 18:08
49,865
-90
31 Oct 2026, 14:48
49,955
-318
30 Oct 2026, 14:55
50,273
-747
29 Oct 2026, 12:49
51,020
-531
28 Oct 2026, 10:01
51,551
-238
27 Oct 2026, 13:06
51,789
+29
26 Oct 2026, 16:19
51,760
+21
25 Oct 2026, 16:16
51,739
-62
24 Oct 2026, 14:54
51,801
-69
23 Oct 2026, 11:44
51,870
-67
22 Oct 2026, 13:37
51,937
-21
21 Oct 2026, 03:59
51,958
-29
19 Oct 2026, 22:56
51,987
first reading
Engagement
439 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 194 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
7.54%
avg views ÷ 49,833 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,760
143 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.97%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
143
of 439 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 November 2026
Posts held
439 (5 August 2026 – 10 November 2026)
Views total
537,450
Reactions total
10,575
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
11 Nov 2026, 00:08 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈11,200
Videos
≈208
Links
≈4,890
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
17m 22s
Average length
1m 20s
Measured directly from 13 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
30,929 reactions across 433 posts, in 33 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 19.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
😡
5,876
19.0%
❤
5,076
16.4%
😢
3,554
11.5%
👍
3,114
10.1%
💔
2,968
9.60%
🕊
2,310
7.47%
😱
1,587
5.13%
🤡
1,478
4.78%
🔥
724
2.34%
🤮
680
2.20%
🤯
515
1.67%
💩
510
1.65%
❤🔥
444
1.44%
💊
329
1.06%
🤔
321
1.04%
👏
286
0.925%
😁
246
0.795%
🤣
228
0.737%
😨
157
0.508%
👎
140
0.453%
13 further kinds
386
1.25%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 439 of the 439 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 31,262 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 439 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 10 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
26
across the posts below
Posts paid on
7
of 439 we hold a reading for · 2%
Most on one post
20
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @deptone. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 439 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 10 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 22 of 143 posts held from the last 30 days (15.4%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Кремлеботы исчезли после удара по Яндексу? Мы проверили
После ударов по Яндексу журналисты и политики заговорили об исчезновении кремлеботов. Новость дошла до Владимира Зеленского. Но история громкой победы над пропагандой началась с одного твита и неправильно понятого графика.
Как слух превратился в международную новость? Почему ему поверили люди, чья работа — проверять информацию? Глава «Первого отдела» Дмитрий З…
Александре Козлан не оказывают стоматологическое лечение. Несмотря на отсутствие пяти передних зубов, прокуратура пишет, что заключенная «не имеет претензий»
Спортсменку Александру Козлан задержали в 2025 году по делу о госизмене. При задержании ее жестоко избили и выбили зуб — его отсутствие видно на интервью, которое снимал военкор Сладков для одного из выпусков цикла «Охота на оборотней». С тех пор состояние оста…
Правозищитника Алексея Соколова обвинили в госизмене за передачу Норвежскому Хельсинкскому комитету
данных о нарушениях прав заключенных
Алексей Соколов — сооснователь организации «Правозащитники Урала», которая помогает заключенным оспаривать незаконные действия сотрудников ФСИН. 16 декабря 2025 года у него прошел обыск по статье о «нежелательной» организации, позже стало известно, что Соколова обвиняют в «госизмен…
Прокуратура запросила 15 лет колонии для адвоката Марии Бонцлер по делу о госизмене — «Слово защите»
Обвинение запросило 15 лет лишения свободы для адвоката Марии Бонцлер в ходе закрытого заседания по делу о госизмене. Об этом сообщил Telegram-канал «Слово защите» со ссылкой на защитника Бонцлер Илью Сидорова. Также прокурор просит назначить Бонцлер штраф в размере 10 тысяч рублей, ограничение свободы и взыскание пр…
МВД хочет перевести учет заявлений в электронную базу, юристы видят в этом риски фальсификаций
МВД подготовило проект изменений в приказ № 736, регламентирующий порядок регистрации сообщений о преступлениях. Документ разрешает региональным управлениям полиции отказаться от бумажной Книги учета заявлений и сообщений (КУСП) и вести ее исключительно в электронном виде через внутренние информационные системы ведомства.
…
В 10:50 по московскому времени начнутся переговоры России, Украины и США в Абу-Даби
Российскую делегацию возглавляет помощник Путина, экс-министр культуры и автор школьного учебника по истории Владимир Мединский. В ее состав также вошли замглавы МИД Сергей Рябков и Михаил Галузин, начальник ГРУ Генштаба Игорь Костюков и замначальника Главного оперативного управления Генштаба Юрий Жигарловский. Координировать работу …
В Госдуме поддержали введение штрафов за «дискредитацию традиционных ценностей»
Комитет Госдумы по уголовному и административному законодательству рекомендовал принять в первом чтении законопроект о введении штрафов за ‘дискредитацию традиционных российских духовно-нравственных ценностей’. Ответственность планируют ввести для для владельцев соцсетей и аудиовизуальных сервисов. Законопроект касается «аудиовизуальных …
Политзаключенная Евгения Конфоркина: «Я просто стараюсь не потерять себя»
В 2024 году зоозащитницу из Люберец Евгению Конфоркину обвинили в «госизмене». По версии следствия, она отправила анкету на вступление в «Легион „Свобода России“» (еще до признания его «террористической» организацией), сняла «периметр территории» вертолетного завода и отправила видео в ЛСР. Конфоркина настаивала, что не видела ничего незаконно…
«Я хочу вытащить своего сына из этого дерьма». Как матери срочников пытаются спасти их от войны
В России растет число жалоб на принуждение срочников к подписанию контрактов с Минобороны, что позволяет отправлять их на войну в Украину. За неполный 2026 год «Школа призывника» получила почти 80 таких обращений — больше, чем за два предыдущих года совокупно. «Вот Так» нашел более сотни историй предполагаемого принуждени…
720 приговоров за три месяца — новый рекорд российских судов по делам о «терроризме»
В третьем квартале 2026 года суды вынесли 720 приговоров по делам о «терроризме», это самый высокий показатель в истории современной России. Фигурантами этих дел стали 779 человек.
Показатели росли от квартала к кварталу:
I квартал: 449 приговоров в отношении 483 человек;
II квартал: 696 приговоров в отношении 751 человека;
III кв…
Несуществующие революционные ячейки, разговоры и граффити «Смерть режиму». Рассказываем, как государство преследует антифашистов
9 ноября — Международный день борьбы с фашизмом. В России, несмотря на культ победы во Второй мировой войне, антифашизм регулярно становится поводом для убийств активистов и возбуждения уголовных дел. Вспоминаем самые громкие случаи преследования.
🔹Дело «Сети». В 2017 году в Пензе и Санкт…
🕊27😡15🔥8❤7😢4👍2
Showing the 12 most recent of 439 posts we hold for @deptone. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@deptone edited 9 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
3 November 2026
Polls
The 5 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Как, по вашему мнению, государство и общество должны относиться к мигрантам?
Приоритетно защищать: помогать в первую очередь как самой уязвимой группе4%
Дать равные права: обеспечить те же гарантии, что и у местных жителей16%
Помогать интеграции: давать права при условии знания языка и законов55%
Ограничивать: вводить жесткие квоты и одобрять въезд только по контрактам9%
Минимизировать: ужесточать контроль, сокращать въезд и выдворять8%
Посмотреть результаты / Другое8%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 439 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 10 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republished by 65 registered channels. The 48 listed are the ones that have forwarded the most posts; the rest are counted here but not each listed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 83 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 24 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Сетевые Свободы @NetFreedomsProject · 34,893 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 2 September 2026
ОВД-Инфо @ovdinfo · 120,483 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 14 August 2026
ЗАХАРОВ @zakharovchannel · 29,816 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 7 September 2026
Avtozak LIVE @avtozaklive · 25,650 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 13 September 2026
ДСО — Движение сознательных отказчиков @stoparmy · 56,933 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 27 August 2026
Школа призывника | правозащитная организация @netprizyvu · 46,911 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 27 August 2026
Вёрстка @svobodnieslova · 112,555 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 14 August 2026
ОВД-Инфо LIVE @ovdinfolive · 27,012 Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 10 September 2026
Такие дела @takiedela · 24,651 Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 15 September 2026
Легалайз @legalayz_live · 22,238 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 26 September 2026
DOXA @doxajournal · 33,917 Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 3 September 2026
Давайте. Проект помощи украинцам @helpdesk_media · 27,282 Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 10 September 2026
Ковчег @ArkHelps · 92,136 Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 17 August 2026
Медиазона @mediazzzona · 164,622 Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 12 August 2026
Гласная @glasnaya_media · 21,018 Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 4 October 2026
RusNews ⭕️ @rusnews · 24,030 Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 19 September 2026
Наш Выход @dvizhenie_nashvyhod · 52,692 Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 25 August 2026
Roskomsvoboda @roskomsvoboda · 40,498 Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 29 August 2026
Феминистское Антивоенное Сопротивление @femagainstwar · 24,733 Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 15 September 2026
Идите лесом! @iditelesom_help · 165,420 Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 13 August 2026
Новая газета Европа @novaya_europe · 117,136 Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 14 August 2026
Люди Байкала @Baikal_People · 22,008 Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 28 September 2026
Кедр.медиа @kedr_media · 30,350 Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 7 September 2026
Tech Talk @ru_tech_talk · 31,574 Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 6 September 2026
This channel appears in 40 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cross-platform identity — Wikidata
A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Первый отдел” (@deptone), 49,833 subscribers as measured 9 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/deptone.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.