National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Content that also appears on other registered channels
Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 2 of the 2 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 440 comparable posts for this entry, running 5 August 2026 to 10 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).
Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Growth
63 measurements spanning 98 days, net +6,327. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 21,545–29,923 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 63
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
11 Nov 2026, 12:06
28,839
-7
9 Nov 2026, 14:20
28,846
-9
8 Nov 2026, 03:14
28,855
+13
7 Nov 2026, 03:26
28,842
-2
5 Nov 2026, 03:45
28,844
-10
4 Nov 2026, 06:58
28,854
-15
3 Nov 2026, 05:21
28,869
-12
2 Nov 2026, 06:29
28,881
-8
1 Nov 2026, 08:38
28,889
-18
31 Oct 2026, 11:06
28,907
-15
30 Oct 2026, 09:08
28,922
-26
29 Oct 2026, 09:56
28,948
-8
28 Oct 2026, 09:36
28,956
+8
27 Oct 2026, 08:36
28,948
+539
26 Oct 2026, 08:09
28,409
+5
25 Oct 2026, 09:46
28,404
-5
24 Oct 2026, 08:15
28,409
+294
23 Oct 2026, 11:15
28,115
+25
22 Oct 2026, 14:04
28,090
-26
21 Oct 2026, 04:17
28,116
first reading
Engagement
533 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 148 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
27.2%
avg views ÷ 28,839 subscribers
Avg views / post
7,840
180 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.69%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
180
of 533 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 November 2026
Posts held
533 (5 August 2026 – 10 November 2026)
Views total
1,411,270
Reactions total
23,912
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
11 Nov 2026, 01:48 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
55m 30s
Average length
58s
Measured directly from 57 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
80,623 reactions across 522 posts, in 72 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 17.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
13,777
17.1%
🤬
13,228
16.4%
🤡
8,930
11.1%
👍
4,775
5.92%
😢
4,034
5.00%
🕊
3,550
4.40%
🔥
3,357
4.16%
🤮
3,194
3.96%
💔
3,012
3.74%
🤣
2,477
3.07%
😱
2,392
2.97%
💩
2,347
2.91%
😁
2,279
2.83%
👎
2,099
2.60%
😭
1,879
2.33%
🤯
1,158
1.44%
❤🔥
1,088
1.35%
😨
918
1.14%
💯
700
0.868%
🙏
643
0.798%
52 further kinds
4,786
5.94%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 533 of the 533 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 82,258 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 533 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 10 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
27
across the posts below
Posts paid on
20
of 533 we hold a reading for · 4%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @perm36. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 533 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 10 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 74 of 180 posts held from the last 30 days (41.1%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
На месте Театрального дома у Центрального рынка построят трассу и аллею
Недавно стало известно, что дом могут снести уже в следующем году. На его месте будет проходить дорога — текущую хотят расширить до шести полос. А также там хотят высадить липовую аллею.
Напомним, что дом долгое время не ремонтировался и не признавался исторически ценным. В 2022 году власти приняли план реновации района Центрального рынка. Уже …
В Карагайском округе хотят ликвидировать восемь деревень
Речь про Ванькино, Володино, Денисята, Ершовка, Жданова, Кирьяново, Сергино и Сосуново. По данным чиновников, там никто не живёт, дома разрушились, а дороги заросли.
➡️ Подписаться | Написать нам | Наш VPN| Рекламодателям | Поддержать | Чат ✊
Проезд в Перми подорожает ещё больше, чем обещали чиновники
По новым расчётам, проезд с 15 апреля следующего года должен будет стоить 50 рублей, тогда как ранее было утверждено повышение до 47 рублей.
Напомним, что ранее власти Перми объявили о повышении цен на проездные. Также, согласно новым планам, коммуналка в ближайшие несколько лет будет дорожать ещё сильнее, чем ранее планировали чиновники.
➡️ Подписаться…
Врач год отработала в сельской больнице и осталась должна государству три миллиона
63-летняя Татьяна с 40-летним стажем переехала в Чердынь по программе «Земский доктор». Ей обещали хорошее жильё и выплатили 3 млн рублей за обязательство проработать пять лет.
Но квартиру предоставили без центрального отопления и канализации, с плесенью на стенах. Зимой температура на улице опускалась до −42 градусов. Женщина заболе…
В Прикамье рекордно подешевел бензин
Росстат утверждает, что в начале ноября средняя цена за литр топлива упала на 1,89 рубля и теперь составляет 73,60 рубля.
АИ-92 подешевел с 70,19 до 68,55 рубля;
АИ-95 снизился в цене с 79,02 до 76,92 рубля;
АИ-98 остался на прежнем уровне — 99,97 рубля.
А как вы оцениваете ситуацию с бензином в последнее время?
➡️ Подписаться | Написать нам | Наш VPN| Рекламодателям | Поддер…
Арсению Турбину опять нужны деньги на оплату адвоката
На оплату защиты Арсения нужно 150 тысяч рублей. Деньги нужно собрать до 12 ноября.
К сожалению, следствие затягивается, и нам вновь предстоит оплатить услуги адвокатов за следующий месяц. Все собранные ранее средства были направлены на юридическую помощь за прошлый месяц (150 000 рублей), а оставшаяся сумма ушла на нужды Арсения: передачи, письма и другие необх…
Константину Окуневу отказали в смягчении приговора
Такое решение вынес апелляционный военный суд во Власихе (Московская область).
Напомним, что бывший депутат краевого Заксобрания и оппозиционер получил семь лет колонии за «призывы к терроризму» через соцсети. До этого его более 10 раз штрафовали по административным протоколам за его антивоенную позицию.
➡️ Подписаться | Написать нам | Наш VPN| Рекламодателям | По…
Пермские учительницы о цензуре и пропаганде в школе
👉 СМОТРЕТЬ
Мы поговорили с учителями нескольких пермских школ о том, как сейчас устроена система образования. Как детей пичкают пропагандой и как давят на преподавателей и запугивают их.
➡️ Подписаться | Написать нам | Наш VPN| Рекламодателям | Поддержать | Чат ✊
🤗 Это дождь из котов!
Пятница — самое время, чтобы снять стресс, поделившись фотографиями своих домашних питомцев. Присылайте их в кото-бот нашего канала «Пермский кот дня» или в комментарии.
➡️ Подписаться | Написать нам | Наш VPN| Рекламодателям | Поддержать | Чат ✊
Штормовое предупреждение объявили и на завтра. Готовимся...
➡️ Подписаться | Написать нам | Наш VPN | Рекламодателям | Поддержать | Чат ✊
🫡50🎅6👍5❤1🥰1
Showing the 12 most recent of 533 posts we hold for @perm36. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@perm36 edited 10 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
12 August 2026
Most recent edit
10 November 2026
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 1 post on @perm36 as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
1 September 2026
Most recent seen missing
1 September 2026
Median time before seen missing
36 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 54 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
ПЕРММ — музей современного искусства @permmmuseum · 1,860#98
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 14 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
59.RU | Новости Перми @news59ru · 49,378 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 25 August 2026
Пермь №1 @perm01 · 22,884 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 19 September 2026
МОЙ ГОРОД - ПЕРМЬ! @vikiperm · 29,109 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 8 September 2026
Properm.ru @mud_no · 25,592 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 13 September 2026
Пермь с огоньком @permjtop · 49,136 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 25 August 2026
Пермь Активная @Perm_Active · 26,261 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 12 September 2026
Большая Пермь | URA.RU @Bolshaya_P · 27,226 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 10 September 2026
ЧП ДТП Пермь @chpdtpperm · 24,456 Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 16 September 2026
Пермский глобус @permskiykanal · 41,452 Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 29 August 2026
Дмитрий Махонин @mahonin59 · 28,512 Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 9 September 2026
Пермь ЧП и ДТП, новости @chp_prm · 27,965 Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 10 September 2026
This channel appears in 11 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Пермь 36,6” (@perm36), 28,839 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/perm36.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.