Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Демография упала

Channel

Демография упала

@populationdemography

On this record: Topic · Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

11,263subscribers

+157 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001355635536
TypeChannel
Username@populationdemography
DescriptionПро демографию
Created21 April 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 November 2026
Measurements held55
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 10 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/populationdemography

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 88% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Previous handles

Recorded in 2019 as “Демографии чуток / Demography” — the title held for this same channel (matched by Telegram id, not by handle) in the Pushshift Telegram Dataset, a third-party archive captured in 2019-2020, years before this register made its own first observation. CC BY 4.0, Baumgartner, Zannettou, Squire & Blackburn (2020), Zenodo. A third party’s dated snapshot, not a measurement this register made itself.

Growth

11,10111,29311,1975 August 2026 — 11,106 subscribers6 August 2026 — 11,106 subscribers7 August 2026 — 11,108 subscribers8 August 2026 — 11,106 subscribers9 August 2026 — 11,103 subscribers10 August 2026 — 11,101 subscribers11 August 2026 — 11,102 subscribers12 August 2026 — 11,104 subscribers15 August 2026 — 11,108 subscribers16 August 2026 — 11,110 subscribers17 August 2026 — 11,115 subscribers18 August 2026 — 11,116 subscribers19 August 2026 — 11,117 subscribers20 August 2026 — 11,116 subscribers21 August 2026 — 11,118 subscribers23 August 2026 — 11,117 subscribers24 August 2026 — 11,116 subscribers25 August 2026 — 11,112 subscribers27 August 2026 — 11,111 subscribers29 August 2026 — 11,110 subscribers30 August 2026 — 11,105 subscribers31 August 2026 — 11,103 subscribers1 September 2026 — 11,110 subscribers3 September 2026 — 11,185 subscribers4 September 2026 — 11,225 subscribers7 September 2026 — 11,222 subscribers10 September 2026 — 11,268 subscribers12 September 2026 — 11,271 subscribers14 September 2026 — 11,251 subscribers16 September 2026 — 11,258 subscribers18 September 2026 — 11,264 subscribers25 September 2026 — 11,257 subscribers3 October 2026 — 11,256 subscribers8 October 2026 — 11,258 subscribers12 October 2026 — 11,271 subscribers14 October 2026 — 11,281 subscribers15 October 2026 — 11,284 subscribers16 October 2026 — 11,282 subscribers18 October 2026 — 11,279 subscribers19 October 2026 — 11,277 subscribers20 October 2026 — 11,274 subscribers22 October 2026 — 11,293 subscribers23 October 2026 — 11,289 subscribers24 October 2026 — 11,286 subscribers25 October 2026 — 11,287 subscribers26 October 2026 — 11,285 subscribers27 October 2026 — 11,289 subscribers28 October 2026 — 11,290 subscribers29 October 2026 — 11,285 subscribers30 October 2026 — 11,283 subscribers31 October 2026 — 11,279 subscribers1 November 2026 — 11,274 subscribers3 November 2026 — 11,266 subscribers6 November 2026 — 11,267 subscribers8 November 2026 — 11,263 subscribers11,2635 August 20268 November 2026
55 measurements spanning 95 days, net +157. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,072–11,322 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 55
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Nov 2026, 16:4611,263-4
6 Nov 2026, 09:5611,267+1
3 Nov 2026, 01:0611,266-8
1 Nov 2026, 22:4511,274-5
31 Oct 2026, 23:5011,279-4
30 Oct 2026, 21:3911,283-2
29 Oct 2026, 23:2611,285-5
28 Oct 2026, 20:1111,290+1
27 Oct 2026, 16:1011,289+4
26 Oct 2026, 15:0511,285-2
25 Oct 2026, 12:0811,287+1
24 Oct 2026, 14:4611,286-3
23 Oct 2026, 17:5511,289-4
22 Oct 2026, 14:1811,293+19
20 Oct 2026, 07:4911,274-3
19 Oct 2026, 09:3611,277-2
18 Oct 2026, 08:5611,279-3
16 Oct 2026, 06:2811,282-2
15 Oct 2026, 09:4511,284+3
14 Oct 2026, 11:5811,281first reading

Engagement

41 posts held, back to 1 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 58 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
60.0%
avg views ÷ 11,263 subscribers
Avg views / post
6,760
15 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.89%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
15
of 41 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 November 2026
Posts held41 (1 April 2026 – 2 November 2026)
Views total101,420
Reactions total1,914
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Nov 2026, 09:23 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈1,070
Videos
≈1
Links
≈67

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

6,066 reactions across 41 posts, in 48 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 17.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤔1,03017.0%
👍97216.0%
❤82113.5%
😢74212.2%
✍2984.91%
🎃2444.02%
🔥2333.84%
💯1722.84%
🙈1712.82%
🤓1712.82%
👨‍💻1492.46%
😭1322.18%
👀1272.09%
💅1252.06%
😱1151.90%
🤯791.30%
🦄711.17%
😐420.692%
👏410.676%
😨300.495%
28 further kinds3014.96%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 41 of the 41 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6,066 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 41 most recent posts we hold, published 1 April 2026 to 2 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 15 posts held from the last 30 days (13.3%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

2 Nov 2026, 13:17 UTC≈4,420 views128 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Число детей на 1 женщину в возрасте 40-49 лет по самоопределению уровня достатка* Россия, 2025 г. По данным РМЭЗ. * самоопределение по шкале от 1 до 9, где 1 – нищие, а 9 – богатые. бедные – нижняя треть шкалы (от 1 до 3) средние – средняя треть шкалы (от 4 до 6) богатые – верхняя треть шкалы (от 7 до 9). Закономерность, характерная для теперь уже большинства развитых обществ: у более богатых полнее реализация репр…

🤔64👍37❤14💅7✍4💘1🤩1

30 Oct 2026, 20:21 UTC≈4,300 views193 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

На самом деле, при создании поста об искусственном интеллекте (ответах на вопрос несет ли его развитие возможности или риски человечеству) ИИ не использовался. Таким образом, ваши ответы в опросе подтверждают, что живые мясные люди достигли уровня развития, позволяющего эффективно имитировать ИИ.

🤓145💅20❤13🤔8🎃5🏆2

29 Oct 2026, 14:06 UTC≈6,270 views185 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Мужчины и Женщины России с Высшим образованием, по возрастным группам, 2025 г. Половозрастная пирамида по брачному состоянию (млн чел.) и нагрузка свободными женщинами на 1 свободного мужчину по возрастным группам. «в браке» подразумевает всех живущих как в зарегистрированном браке, так и в незарегистрированном (сожительстве). «свободные» включают в себя никогда не вступавших в брак, разведенных и вдовых. Оценочные …

💅78🤔41👻16❤11👍11💯8🤯8🤓6

28 Oct 2026, 19:39 UTC≈4,860 views32 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Poll

Как вы думаете, дальнейшее развитие искусственного интеллекта (ИИ, он же AI) несет человечеству больше возможностей или больше рисков?

  1. Скорее больше возможностей51%
  2. Скорее больше рисков23%
  3. Что-то среднее, нет ответа, прочее26%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

🔥15🎃9❤3😨3🤓2

28 Oct 2026, 19:38 UTC≈4,500 views34 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Poll

Как вы считаете, при создании предыдущего поста использовался искусственный интеллект (ИИ, он же AI, он же нейросеть) ?

  1. Скорее не использовался21%
  2. Скорее использовался64%
  3. Нет ответа, прочее14%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

🎃27🎉5👏2

28 Oct 2026, 19:35 UTC≈4,640 views92 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Дальнейшее развитие искусственного интеллекта (ИИ, он же AI) несет человечеству больше возможностей или больше рисков? Ответы по возрастным группам респондентов, Россия, 2025 г., % По данным РМЭЗ

🎃54☃16😘10❤6👍2❤‍🔥1🔥1🥰1

27 Oct 2026, 10:12 UTC≈6,120 views191 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Доля свободных* мужчин и женщин в России по возрастным группам, 2025 г., % * не состоящих в фактическом браке, т.е. никогда не состоявшие в браке + одинокие вдовые + разведенные По данным РМЭЗ

😢81🤔51👏16❤15🕊11🔥5😐4👻3

22 Oct 2026, 13:07 UTC≈7,340 views46 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Poll

Вы уже отведали оленины?

  1. Фу, нет34%
  2. Нет, но планируем27%
  3. Да39%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

🌭15🦄11💔6💅4😱3🐳2👍1👻1

22 Oct 2026, 13:06 UTC≈10,900 views182 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Обеспеченность россиян северными оленями. Число северных оленей на 1 тыс. жителей по регионам России, 2025 г. В целом по России =10,1 (т.е. примерно по одной штуке на сотню россиян). В трех регионах северных оленей больше, чем людей (Ненецкий, Ямало-Ненецкий и Чукотский автономные округа). Благодаря полярному сельскому хозяйству Ямала сегодня чуть ли не в каждом обычном супермаркете России можно купить тушенку из …

❤74😭34🦄30🔥16👍7😎6🐳5🤓3

21 Oct 2026, 10:38 UTC≈7,740 views167 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Удовлетворенность жизнью среди женщин в возрасте 30-59 лет, по числу рожденных детей, %, Россия, 2025 год.

🙈66✍45👀24😐10👍7🤔7🦄4❤3

20 Oct 2026, 15:07 UTC≈7,530 views168 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Доля россиян, которые используют VPN (а также не/знают про него), по возрастным группам, 2025 г., %, среди россиян, которые пользуются интернетом.

👨‍💻81🤔39❤22👌10💯6👍4🔥3😢2

20 Oct 2026, 15:06 UTC≈6,390 views130 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Доля россиян в возрасте 14 лет и старше, которые используют VPN (а также не/знают про него), 2024 и 2025, %, среди россиян, которые пользуются интернетом.

👨‍💻66🤔25❤16👌13👍8🐳1🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 41 posts we hold for @populationdemography. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@populationdemography edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
10 August 2026
Most recent edit
10 August 2026

Polls

The 5 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

28 Oct 2026, 19:39 UTCAnonymous Poll1,710 voters approx.

Как вы думаете, дальнейшее развитие искусственного интеллекта (ИИ, он же AI) несет человечеству больше возможностей или больше рисков?

  1. Скорее больше возможностей51%
  2. Скорее больше рисков23%
  3. Что-то среднее, нет ответа, прочее26%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

28 Oct 2026, 19:38 UTCAnonymous Poll1,380 voters approx.

Как вы считаете, при создании предыдущего поста использовался искусственный интеллект (ИИ, он же AI, он же нейросеть) ?

  1. Скорее не использовался21%
  2. Скорее использовался64%
  3. Нет ответа, прочее14%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

22 Oct 2026, 13:07 UTCAnonymous Poll1,460 voters approx.

Вы уже отведали оленины?

  1. Фу, нет34%
  2. Нет, но планируем27%
  3. Да39%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

9 Jul 2026, 16:39 UTCAnonymous Poll2,220 voters approx.

Какой должна быть разница пенсионного возраста мужчин и женщин в России?

  1. У женщин должен быть выше на более, чем 5 лет5%
  2. У женщин должен быть выше на 5 лет5%
  3. У женщин должен быть выше на 3-4 года2%
  4. У женщин должен быть выше на 1-2 года2%
  5. Должен быть одинаковым у женщин и мужчин71%
  6. У мужчин должен быть выше на 1-2 года4%
  7. У мужчин должен быть выше на 3-4 года4%
  8. У мужчин должен быть выше на 5 лет5%
  9. У мужчин должен быть выше на более, чем 5 лет3%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

30 Jun 2026, 14:16 UTCAnonymous Poll1,760 voters approx.

А вы становились жертвой преступления в течение последнего года?

  1. Да13%
  2. Нет81%
  3. Прочее, нет ответа6%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 41 most recent posts we hold, published 1 April 2026 to 2 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Data distributor
@sterngang · 21,175
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 2 October 2026
Если быть точным
@tochno_st · 19,605
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 2 October 2026
PORNSTAT / статистика
@pornstat · 33,060
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 5 September 2026
Опросы и замеры
@oizmedia · 21,750
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 22 September 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Демография упала” (@populationdemography), 11,263 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/populationdemography.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.