Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for انجمن علمی فلسفه علم شریف

Channel

انجمن علمی فلسفه علم شریف

@philsharif

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

11,644subscribers

+182 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001049243361
TypeChannel
Username@philsharif
Description«انجمن‌ علمی فلسفه‌ علم دانشگاه صنعتی شریف» سایت گروه: Philsci.sharif.ir کانال آرشیو فایل‌ها: @philsharif_archive
CreatedBetween 1 February 2016 and 30 November 2016 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 November 2026
Measurements held64
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/philsharif

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 88% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (4 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@philosophyofscience/53468 Aug 2026, 08:31 UTC@philsharif/3357 · this entry8 Aug 2026, 09:01 UTC1.0030 minutes
@philsharif/3436 · this entry26 Oct 2026, 05:03 UTC@philosophyofscience/545126 Oct 2026, 08:08 UTC1.003.1 hours
@philsharif/3455 · this entry1 Nov 2026, 19:42 UTC@philosophyofscience/54543 Nov 2026, 05:01 UTC1.0033 hours
@philsharif/3359 · this entry10 Aug 2026, 08:06 UTC@philosophyofscience/534911 Aug 2026, 15:34 UTC0.9831 hours
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@philosophyofscience6 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0017 hoursthis entry (4–2)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 48 comparable posts for this entry, running 7 June 2026 to 11 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 12 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

11,44111,64411,542.55 August 202611 November 2026
64 measurements spanning 98 days, net +182. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,411–11,674 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 64
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Nov 2026, 21:3711,644+6
10 Nov 2026, 01:4611,638+13
8 Nov 2026, 16:5511,625+4
7 Nov 2026, 07:1611,621-3
6 Nov 2026, 07:1611,624+7
5 Nov 2026, 10:1611,617+10
4 Nov 2026, 10:4111,607-1
3 Nov 2026, 07:5911,608-1
2 Nov 2026, 09:0611,609-1
1 Nov 2026, 05:5011,610-2
31 Oct 2026, 03:3811,612+4
30 Oct 2026, 03:4811,608+4
29 Oct 2026, 05:4111,604+2
28 Oct 2026, 02:3011,602+3
27 Oct 2026, 05:4711,599+7
26 Oct 2026, 06:3811,592+13
25 Oct 2026, 05:1511,579+7
24 Oct 2026, 03:5711,572+5
23 Oct 2026, 01:2111,567+9
22 Oct 2026, 02:0611,558first reading

Engagement

57 posts held, back to 16 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 66 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
15.3%
avg views ÷ 11,644 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,780
24 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
24
of 57 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 November 2026
Posts held57 (16 April 2026 – 12 November 2026)
Views total42,723
Reactions total—
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Nov 2026, 21:48 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈1,420
Videos
≈64
Links
≈1,150

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 3 of 24 posts held from the last 30 days (12.5%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

12 Nov 2026, 16:57 UTC773 viewsread 12 November 2026
Photo

📌 «سلسله سخنرانی‌های گروه فلسفه علم» 🖊️«استدلال کیهان‌شناختی کلام و مسئله آغاز فرازمانی» 👤دکتر امیرحسین زادیوسفی - گروه فلسفه و حکمت و منطق دانشگاه تربیت مدرّس 📆دوشنبه 25 آبان‌ماه 🕰️ از ساعت 16:30 تا 18:30 🏢 دانشکده مکانیک دانشگاه صنعتی شریف- طبقه همکف- سالن سمینار G13 ⭕️ مشخصات خود را در این قسمت جهت ورود به دانشگاه وارد کنید. (مهلت ثبت نام خارج از دانشگاه تا پایان روز شنبه، 23 آبان ماه می‌باشد)

11 Nov 2026, 05:34 UTC≈1,310 viewsread 12 November 2026

به نام خدا با سلام و احترام به همراهان گرامی کانال انجمن علمی فلسفه علم دانشگاه صنعتی شریف، بدین‌وسیله ضمن تقدیر و تشکر صمیمانه از زحمات ارزشمند اعضای محترم دوره پیشین انجمن، آغاز فعالیت دوره جدید انجمن علمی فلسفه علم شریف را به اطلاعتان می‌رسانیم. امید است با همراهی شما عزیزان، گام‌های مؤثری در جهت پویایی علمی و فرهنگی برداریم. اعضای شورای مرکزی دوره جدید: الهام سادات موسوی (دبیر) محمدصادق مهدوی شیخ‌احمدلو (نائب د…

10 Nov 2026, 06:17 UTC≈1,590 viewsread 12 November 2026

🛑اطلاع رسانی ضمن عرض پوزش، قابل توجه همراهان گرامی کارگاه بهره‌وری با هوش مصنوعی، امروز برگزار نمی‌شود. تاریخ جایگزین از طریق کانال اطلاع‌رسانی خواهد شد.

9 Nov 2026, 06:24 UTC≈1,840 viewsread 12 November 2026
Photo

◆ انجمن علمی گروه فلسفهٔ علم دانشگاه صنعتی شریف برگزار می‌کند: ◈ کارگاه بهره‌وری با هوش مصنوعی ■ ارائه: مهندس متین یوسفی چکیده: در این ارائه سعی می‌کنیم نحوه‌ی استفاده از هوش مصنوعی فراتر از کار با رابط کاربری تحت وب را ارائه کنیم. با Codex آشنا می‌شویم و می‌بینیم چه طور می‌توانند تجربه‌ی کاربری غنی‌تری از رابط آنلاین ChatGPT ارائه دهد. در نهایت سعی می‌کنیم ایجنت Hermes و ارزش افزوده‌ی آن در استفاده از هوش مصنوعی ر…

8 Nov 2026, 17:14 UTC≈1,670 viewsread 12 November 2026
Photo

«انجمن علمی فلسفه علم دانشگاه صنعتی شریف» در دوره ۱۴۰۵–۱۴۰۴، با وجود حوادث تلخ و فراموش‌نشدنی سال گذشته و تمامِ دشواری‌ها، کوشید تا در حد توان و در چارچوب جایگاه و مسئولیت خود، برنامه‌هایی در راستای گسترش و تقویت فضای آکادمیک فلسفه در ایران برگزار کند. شایان ذکر است که انجمن علمی فلسفه علم شریف برای برگزاری این رویدادها در دانشگاه صنعتی شریف، هیچگونه حمایت مالی دریافت نکرد، و تمامی جلسات با همراهی، تلاش و هزینه شخصی…

8 Nov 2026, 11:00 UTC≈1,620 viewsread 12 November 2026

◆ نتایج انتخابات انجمن علمی فلسفه علم شریف: ۱- سعید بنایی: ۱۹ رأی ۲- محمدصادق مهدوی شیخ احمدلو: ۱۷ رأی ۳- بنیامین عارفی: ۱۳ رأی ۴- میلاد صلاحی‌فرد: ۱۳ رأی ۵- الهام‌سادات موسوی: ۱۳ رأی ۶- امیررضا محمود‌زاده: ۱۱ رأی ۷- علیرضا رفسنجانی مقدم: ۵ رأی پنج نفر اوّل به عنوان اعضای شورای مرکزی انجمن علمی فلسفه علم، شروع به‌ کار خواهند کرد، و دو نفر بعدی نقش اعضای علی‌البدل را خواهند داشت. به دوستان عزیزمان تبریک می‌گوییم …

7 Nov 2026, 12:58 UTC≈1,170 viewsread 12 November 2026
Photo

📌 «سلسله سخنرانی‌های گروه فلسفه علم» 🖊️«آیا علم می‌تواند مسئله تنظیم ظریف را توضیح دهد؟: بازسازی اشکال پس‌روی» 👤دکتر حامد منوچهری - گروه فلسفه علم دانشگاه صنعتی شریف 📆دوشنبه 18 آبان‌ماه 🕰️ از ساعت 16:30 تا 18:30 🏢 دانشکده مکانیک دانشگاه صنعتی شریف - طبقه همکف- سالن سمینار G13 ⭕️ مشخصات خود را در این قسمت جهت ورود به دانشگاه وارد کنید. (مهلت ثبت نام خارج از دانشگاه تا پایان روز شنبه، ۱۶ آبان ماه می‌باشد)

7 Nov 2026, 12:58 UTC≈1,290 viewsread 12 November 2026
Photo

📌 شریف سوفیا با همکاری کتابخانه مرکزی دانشگاه صنعتی شریف برگزار می‌کند: 🎙️ سوفیاسخن | سخنرانی‌های فلسفی 🔸سخنرانی چهارم «انسان در عصر هوش مصنوعی: تأملی فلسفی در اخلاق، روان‌شناسی و الهیات هوش مصنوعی» بر اساس کتاب: “The Ethics, Psychology, and Theology of AI” John Senior & Éva Gyarmathy Taylor & Francis, 2026 🔸دکتر علیرضا اسماعیلی (مدرس و پژوهشگر فلسفه و علوم شناختی دین) 🗓 سه‌شنبه‌ ۱۹ آبان‌ماه ۱۴۰۵ 🕔 ۱۶:۳۰ تا ۱۸…

7 Nov 2026, 06:33 UTC≈1,350 viewsread 12 November 2026
Forwarded from @asranehaye_falsafiPhoto

2⃣ دومین نشست از مجموعه نشست‌هایِ «عَـصْرانِه‌هٰایِ فَـلْسَــفِیْ» دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی برگزار می‌کند؛ 🌱 گیاهخواری همچون نظریه اخلاقی 👤سخنران: دکتر محسن اسلامی عضو هیئت علمی دانشگاه تربیت مدرس 🕐زمان: سه‌شنبه ۱۹ آبان ۱۴۰۵ - ساعت ۱۳ الی ۱۵ 📍مکان برگزاری: دانشکدهٔ ادبیات فارسی و زبان‌های خارجی دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی، طبقه ۳، سالن شهید مطهری 📌ورود برای عموم دانشجویان آزاد است.📌 @asranehaye_falsafi

6 Nov 2026, 19:07 UTC≈1,410 viewsread 12 November 2026
Forwarded from @PhilSciAUTPhoto

جلسه دوم از سلسله جلسات «فلسفه و اخلاق هوش مصنوعی» آیا آگاهی صرفا به پردازش اطلاعات یا کارکردهای محاسباتی وابسته است، یا به بستر زیستی و فیزیکی مغز نیاز دارد؟ برای آشنایی دقیق تر با موضوع بحث، به مقاله نِد بِلاک با عنوان زیر مراجعه نمایید: …

4 Nov 2026, 11:33 UTC≈1,970 viewsread 12 November 2026
Forwarded from @haameeorgPhoto

🔵 فراخوان برنامه بازگشت و استقرار و کمک‌هزینه پسادکتری ⏺موسسه حامی علوم انسانی با همکاری مجموعه مبنا، از پژوهشگران و متخصصان ایرانی برای فعالیت علمی و حرفه‌ای در ایران حمایت می‌کند. ⭐️موسسه حامی علوم انسانی و مجموعه مبنا با هدف پشتیبانی از جریان بازگشت متخصصان علوم انسانی و اجتماعی، «برنامه بازگشت، استقرار و کمک‌هزینه پسادکتری» را تعریف کرده است. این طرح محدود به دانشگاه نیست و حمایت‌ها در دو مسیر موازی دانشگاهی و …

Showing the 12 most recent of 57 posts we hold for @philsharif. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 2 posts on @philsharif as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
28 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
7 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
2 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
1

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 18 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

فیلم های کوتاه روان شناسی
@psyshortmovies · 34,683
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 3 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“انجمن علمی فلسفه علم شریف” (@philsharif), 11,644 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/philsharif.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.