Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for خانهٔ فلسفهٔ دین و الاهیات

Channel

خانهٔ فلسفهٔ دین و الاهیات

@House_philortheo

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

764subscribers

+114 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002160166842
TypeChannel
Username@House_philortheo
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded5 September 2026
Last confirmed live12 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/House_philortheo

Topic

Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 70% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

6507647076 August 2026 — 650 subscribers14 August 2026 — 651 subscribers21 August 2026 — 650 subscribers4 September 2026 — 717 subscribers5 September 2026 — 717 subscribers12 September 2026 — 764 subscribers6 August 202612 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 37 days, net +114. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 633–781 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Sept 2026, 17:37764+47
5 Sept 2026, 18:23717no change
4 Sept 2026, 03:19717+67
21 Aug 2026, 00:57650-1
14 Aug 2026, 15:06651+1
6 Aug 2026, 12:20650first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 1 September 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
21.1%
avg views ÷ 764 subscribers
Avg views / post
161
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 September 2026
Posts held20 (1 September 20265 September 2026)
Views total3,063
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken5 Sept 2026, 18:23 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

5 Sept 2026, 12:47 UTC96 viewsread 5 September 2026
File

#معرفی_منبع در سومین ویرایش از کتاب A Companion to Epistemology از سری مدخل‌های بلاک‌ول در فلسفه، مدخل درون‌گرایی/ برون‌گرایی به قلم کومسانا نگارش یافته که مقاله‌ای به‌روزشده و خواندنی است. Internalism and Externalism (pp. 167-176) JUAN COMESAÑA Philosophy Department, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, USA @House_philortheo

5 Sept 2026, 12:35 UTC102 viewsread 5 September 2026
File

The Possibility of Internalist Epistemology Kurt L. Sylvan @House_philortheo

5 Sept 2026, 12:35 UTC101 viewsread 5 September 2026
File

Is justification just in the head? Clayton Littlejohn @House_philortheo

5 Sept 2026, 12:35 UTC101 viewsread 5 September 2026

#معرفی_منبع در ویرایش جدید کتاب Contemporary Debates in Epistemology (2024) مدخل یادشده با دو بخش زیر جایگزین شده است: Is justification just in the head? Clayton Littlejohn The Possibility of Internalist Epistemology Kurt L. Sylvan @House_philortheo

2 Sept 2026, 19:42 UTC217 viewsread 5 September 2026

چکیده: برون‌گرایی معرفتی دیدگاهی درباره شرط لازم توجیه معرفتی یک باور یا تبدیل آن به یک معرفت است. برون‌گرایی در چند دهه گذشته محبوبیت قابل توجهی یافته و این تحول به فلسفه دین نیز سرایت کرده است، جایی که نظریه‌های برون‌گرایانه توجیه و معرفت برای اثبات شأن معرفتی باورهای دینی به کار گرفته می‌شوند. در این مقاله در بخش نخست، مروری بر برون‌گرایی معرفتی و رقیب آن، درون‌گرایی، ارائه می‌شود. در بخش دوم، برخی از مهم‌ترین کار

2 Sept 2026, 19:41 UTC213 viewsread 5 September 2026
File

#معرفی_منبع بهترین منبع برای مطالعه درباره محور مدرسه برون‌گرایی معرفتی در فلسفه دین، مقاله آقای مکس بیکر هایچ (Max Baker-Hytch) از دانشگاه آکسفورد با عنوان برون‌گرایی معرفتی در فلسفه دین است که یه معرفی اجمالی رویکردهای برون‌گرایانه در فلسفه دین و چالش‌های پیش‌رو می‌پردازد https://evnd.co/XCddF @House_philortheo

2 Sept 2026, 10:22 UTC209 viewsread 5 September 2026

Christopher Tucker William & Mary University Chris received his BA from Emory University in 2003 and his PhD from Purdue University in 2008. He edited Seemings and Justification: New Essays on Dogmatism and Phenomenal Conservatism (OUP 2013) and has published articles in Philosophical Review, Philosophical Perspectives, Philosophical Studies, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, and R

2 Sept 2026, 10:20 UTC177 viewsread 5 September 2026

John Greco Georgetown University John Greco (born April 24, 1961) is the Robert L. McDevitt and Catherine H. McDevitt Professor of Philosophy at Georgetown University. Before coming to Georgetown, Greco taught at Saint Louis University. Greco received his A.B. from Georgetown University in 1983 and completed his Ph.D. at Brown University in 1989 under Ernest Sosa. His research interests are in epistemology and metap

2 Sept 2026, 10:18 UTC152 viewsread 5 September 2026

Nathan Rockwood Brigham Young University (BYU) Nathan Rockwood is an Assistant Professor of Philosophy at Brigham Young University. Prior to this appointment, he received his Ph.D in philosophy at University of California, San Diego and taught at Virginia Tech. His research to this point has focused mostly on early modern epistemology and metaphysics. He has published articles in the History of Philosophy Quarterly

2 Sept 2026, 10:17 UTC148 viewsread 5 September 2026

Kelly James Clark Istanbul’s Ibn Haldun University James Clark (born March 3, 1956) is an American philosopher, scholar of religion, and public intellectual whose work bridges philosophy, theology, science, ethics, and interreligious dialogue. Internationally recognized for his contributions to the philosophy of religion and the relationship between science and faith, Clark has spent decades advancing constructive e

2 Sept 2026, 06:46 UTC189 viewsread 5 September 2026

🔚 پایان معرفی ارائه‌کنندگان در مدرسه تابستانی برون‌گرایی معرفتی در فلسفه دین؛ رویکردها و کارکردها

2 Sept 2026, 06:45 UTC191 viewsread 5 September 2026

چکیده ارائه: این ارائه دیدگاهی تلفیقی درباره توجیه معرفتی ارائه می‌کند که «محافظه‌کاری پدیداری» (Phenomenal Conservatism) را با شرطی برون‌گرایانه مبنی بر قابل اعتماد بودن (reliability) ترکیب می‌کند. استدلال خواهم کرد که یک تجربه دینی یا یک «به‌نظررسیدن» (seeming) می‌تواند برای یک باور دینی توجیه درونی واقعی فراهم کند؛ اما باور تنها در صورتی به‌طور کامل موجه است که از طریق فرایندی عیناً قابل اعتماد نیز شکل گرفته باشد.

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @House_philortheo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“خانهٔ فلسفهٔ دین و الاهیات” (@House_philortheo), 764 subscribers as measured 12 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/House_philortheo.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.