Заявление РКН № 6973531771
Заявление РКН 6973618067
Регистрация в РКН https://goo.su/IRiU
Автор канала
Квалифицированный инвестор,
Магистр Права и Экономики
Для связи: https://t.me/GoodwinPro001
Информация в канале не является ИИР
Created
Between 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
9 measurements spanning 7 days, net -104. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 57,885–58,021 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
13 Aug 2026, 18:07
57,901
-17
12 Aug 2026, 20:23
57,918
-11
11 Aug 2026, 19:06
57,929
-24
10 Aug 2026, 17:34
57,953
-18
9 Aug 2026, 19:55
57,971
-11
8 Aug 2026, 23:03
57,982
-7
8 Aug 2026, 01:33
57,989
-16
7 Aug 2026, 02:15
58,005
no change
7 Aug 2026, 02:08
58,005
first reading
Engagement
39 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 19 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
9.15%
avg views ÷ 57,901 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,300
39 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.56%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
39
of 39 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 August 2026
Posts held
39 (29 July 2026 – 13 August 2026)
Views total
206,607
Reactions total
3,213
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
13 Aug 2026, 22:30 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈3,870
Videos
≈366
Links
≈3,090
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
13s
Average length
13s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
3,213 reactions across 39 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
1,466
45.6%
👍
663
20.6%
😁
279
8.68%
❤
254
7.91%
🤝
124
3.86%
😱
96
2.99%
💯
86
2.68%
🤔
69
2.15%
🐳
60
1.87%
👌
46
1.43%
🤯
39
1.21%
custom 5165707598128742990
8
0.249%
🍾
7
0.218%
🫡
7
0.218%
👏
5
0.156%
🏆
2
0.062%
🙏
2
0.062%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 39 of the 39 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,213reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 39 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 13 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 39 we hold a reading for · 3%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @GoodwinPro1. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 39 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 29 July 2026 to 13 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Спасибо, что пришли 🔥
Сегодня провел большой и качественный разбор всего нашего рынка, ответил на вопросы и посмотрел все компании, которые написали зрители. Считаю, что время провели максимально продуктивно!
Также на эфире для всех участников подготовил методичку по уровням. Можете тоже забрать, мне не жалко полезных материалов для вас 😉
Забрать методичку: https://t.me/Takvelbot?start=inclinedlevels
И по нашей д…
Меньше 2 часов до начала эфира 🔥
Ровно в 19:00 мск жду всех на разбор рынка и ответы на ваши вопросы.
Ссылку на эфирную комнату скоро отправлю, а пока хочу показать вам свое рабочее торговое место. Что скажете о нем? Всего хватает или что-то нужно добавить?😃
https://www.instagram.com/reel/Db-04JVsWzU/?igsh=bDFleHgzcGYzNnpp
Буду рад обратной связи 😉
+654 000 на шорте рынка🔥
Тех, кто в лонгах был - сейчас очень сильно разматывает рынок.
Я шортил рынок. По фьючерсу на индекс Мосбиржи (сделка из закрытого канала по активной торговле) сейчас профит более 650 000 рублей.
Недавно, кстати, рассказывал про "отскок дохлой кошки", всем оптимистам рекомендую прочитать ☝️
Что делать дальше на рынке — разберем сегодня в 19:00 мск на прямом эфире! Приходите обязательно!
…
Почему 95% людей терпят неудачу
Недавно мне попалась интересная статистика, что 80-95% людей, похудевших с помощью диеты, в итоге набирают сброшенные килограммы обратно. Люди постоянно прыгают из одного жесткого ограничения в другое и регулярно терпят неудачу.
Мы сталкиваемся с этим каждый раз, когда слышим обещания, что вот, с понедельника перестану тратить деньги на ерунду, начну ходить в зал, закрою кредиты...
…
Завтра в 19:00 мск всех жду на разборе рынка ❗️
Коллеги, напоминаю, что завтра мы с вами встречаемся на прямом эфире!
Разберем все самые важные вопросы:
— Технический анализ индекса Московской биржи, нефти, газа, золота, серебра
— По традиции также будет разбор компаний зрителей онлайн
— Анализ экономической и геополитической повестки
— Ответы на вопросы
Ссылку на эфир отправлю сюда завтра за 10 минут до начала. П…
❗️Джей Ди Вэнс потребовал прекратить удары по российской инфраструктуре 🗣
Украина согласилась прекратить удары по трубопроводной инфраструктуре и танкерам третьих стран.
Договоренность была достигнута после прямого запроса вице-президента США Джей Ди Вэнса.
Думаю, рынок позитивно отыграет эту новость. Но тут важно понимать, что решение исключительно в интересах США, это не уступка России 😠
Потому что через морско…
🏦 Сбербанк отчитался за семь месяцев
🔹Чистая прибыль Сбербанка достигла ₽1,16 трлн (+19,8% год к году). В июле показатель составил ₽168,4 млрд (+16,2% год к году)
🔹Рентабельность капитала за семь месяцев составила 22,9%, в июле — 22,1%
🔹Чистый процентный доход вырос на 24,4%, до ₽2,1 трлн.
🔹Достаточность общего капитала снизилась на 1,5 п.п. за месяц до 13,2% за счет учета рекордных дивидендов за 2025 год
Начинаетс…
Итоги дивидендного сезона 💰
И так, думаю можно уже подводить итоги дивидендного сезона и его влияния на рынок. Крупных летних дивидендов уже не осталось.
С марта по июль российские компании зафиксировали реестры 112 раз и направили акционерам 2,27 трлн рублей 😲
Но общий объем выплат оказался ниже прошлого года (2,67 трлн руб.) из-за падения выплат в нефтегазовом секторе на 43%. Самым главным оказался Сбер, который…
⚡️Важное объявление
Друзья, дата эфира немного сдвигается!
❗️Встретимся 13 августа (четверг) в 19:00 мск на разборе рынка!
Внезапно коллега-трейдер приехал в Питер😃
Решили с ним встретиться и записать для вас крутой материал по рынку и трейдингу🔥
🖼 Вячеслав Таквель
Самолет растет на 7%! У компании новый акционер 🏗
Акции Самолета резко растут, в моменте почти +7%. Получилась красивая зеленая свеча 😁
Фонд Горизонт полностью вышел из акций, продал около 18% обыкновенных голосующих акций девелопера.
Пакет перешел к Fonte Inceptia Alpha Fund OEIC Limited. Это инвестиционная компания под управлением Fonte Capital Ltd, зарегистрированной в Международном финансовом центре «Астана» (…
Давно что-то не было эфиров с разбором рынка🤔
Предлагаю провести в среду в 19:00 мск!
Середина недели, как раз инфляция новая будет и с рынком станет более менее понятно.
Кто будет на эфире в среду в 19:00 мск, оставляйте огоньки 🔥
🖼 Вячеслав Таквель
🔥182😁8👍4❤1🤝1
Showing the 12 most recent of 39 posts we hold for @GoodwinPro1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 39 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 13 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 169,362 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
PROFIT @profit1 · 187,787 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 11 August 2026
Профита нет. А если найду? @profitanet · 203,197 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 11 August 2026
финансы.про @finance_pro_tg · 121,164 Telegram ranks this channel #84 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 14 August 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Вячеслав Таквель (Goodwin)” (@GoodwinPro1), 57,901 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/GoodwinPro1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.