https://www.careet.net/1957

Channel
Persona
@Persona_Identity
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
184subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002249218823 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Persona_Identity |
| Created | Between 1 May 2024 and 31 October 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Persona_Identity |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 12:30 | 184 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:57 | 184 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 14 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 22.5%
- avg views ÷ 184 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 41.4
- 20 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 1.92%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 20
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (14 July 2026 – 2 August 2026) |
| Views total | 827 |
| Reactions total | 1 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 12:30 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈1,210
- Videos
- ≈79
- Links
- ≈930
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2026 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
브레인롯을 기획한 회사는 없다 AI로 만든 밈이 로블록스 최다 플레이 게임 중 하나가 됐고, 일본 출판사가 어린이 도감을 냈고, 인형과 트레이딩 카드가 붙었어요. 그 사슬 어디에도 게임 회사가 없었습니다. 우연인지 보려고 숫자를 찾아봤어요. 만들어 파는 쪽은 성장률 3.9%에 신규 채용 중단, 2026년 글로벌 해고 전망 11,580명, 북미 구직 경쟁률 11 대 1이에요. 같은 기간 로블록스는 산업 소비지출 순증가분의 3분의 2를 혼자 가져갔습니다. 포트나이트는 크리에이터 수가 그대로인데 게시된 맵만 198,000 → 488,000이 됐고요. 문화는 아이들이 대고, 계산은 어른이 한다 로블록스에서 가장 빨리 크는 연령대가 18세 이상이거든요. 브레인롯도 같은 모양이었어요. 캐릭터를 유행시킨 건 초등학생이고, 도감을 팔아 회계에 잡…
여기 7조 투자 받았네요 ㄷㄷ https://www.aitimes.com/news/articleView.html?idxno=213249
내 로블록스 베프는 10살, 하지만 그 계정은 그 친구의 것이 아니다 지난주 트위치가 부모 통제 기능을 열었습니다. 문서를 열어보니 연동을 시작하는 쪽이 부모가 아니라 청소년이었고, 양쪽 다 언제든 끊을 수 있었습니다. 아이가 끊으면 부모에게는 메일이 한 통 갑니다. 아이가 혼자 누를 수 있는 유일한 스위치가 부모의 통제를 끄는 스위치였습니다. 열 살짜리의 로블록스 플레이로 만든 채널이 25일 만에 구독 6만 1500명, 조회 279만을 넘겼습니다. 채널 설명란에는 보호자가 운영한다고 적혀 있습니다. 계정도 채널도 수익도 아이 것이 아닙니다. 그러면 부모가 안 넘겨줄 때 아이는 무엇을 할 수 있을까요. 민법을 찾아봤더니 제924조 청구권자에 자녀가 들어 있었습니다. 법은 부모가 틀릴 수 있다고 이미 가정하고 있었습니다. 그런데 민사소…
4월에 예기치 않은 일이 없었더라면 4월에 나왔을 글인데 이제야 쓰네요...
Deja Vu, 요즘 내가 제일 좋아하는 노래 "야 너 거제 야호 알아?" 중학생 친구의 질문에서 시작했다. 밈을 따라가다 팬이 됐고, 팬이 되고 나니 이 한 곡이 안 빠진다. 리센느(RESCENE)는 장면(Scene)과 향(Scent)을 붙인 이름이다. 향 하나가 지나간 장면을 통째로 데려온다는 뜻. 방마다 다른 디퓨저를 쓸 만큼 향에 약한 나한테는 남 얘기가 아니다. 그래서 Deja Vu가 우연처럼 안 들린다. 처음 듣는데 어딘가 이미 아는 것 같은 그 기시감. 향이 기억을 데려오듯, 이 곡은 지나간 장면을 데려온다. 리센느를 가장 잘 담은 노래라고 생각한 이유다. 거제 야호 밈이 2년 전 곡을 멜론 1위까지 올렸지만, 정작 내가 가장 많이 듣게 된 건 이 한 곡이었다. 전체 이야기 (블로그에서 보기) →
왜 이러고 있는가... 세상이 무너졌기 때문 ㅠ
요즘 알고리즘 망가져서 유익한 건 안 뜨고 이상한 것만 뜨네여... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q2gZotQhIww
오노추 https://youtu.be/-7TQpu7-IhU
컴공에서 다양한 똑똑한 사람들과 교류할 수 있었던 것이 어쩌면 행운일지도 지금도 개발자 분들의 채널을 재밌게 보고 있는데, 사고 방식을 배우는 데 참 좋다고 생각 https://youtu.be/i0NcKL1JLfg
오노추 https://youtu.be/hrkELy64_zA
집중력 높이는 법 : 몰입하면 늘 부족한 시간을 가장 압도적으로 쓸 수 있습니다 | 류재언 (세바시) 오랜만에 찾아온 연휴라 가족들과 밖에서 식사도 하고, 집에 돌아와 밀린 할 일을 정리하며 틀어놓은 영상입니다. 처음에는 단순한 시간 관리나 집중력에 관한 이야기라고 생각했는데, 끝까지 보고 나니 결국은 ‘삶의 밀도’에 관한 이야기라는 생각이 들었습니다. 일할 때는 한 가지 일에 깊이 몰입하고, 쉴 때는 제대로 쉬며, 사랑하는 사람과 함께할 때는 눈앞의 그 사람에게 온전히 집중하는 것. 영화 <어바웃 타임>의 메시지와 연결되는 부분도 특히 인상 깊었습니다. “나는 이제 시간을 돌리지 않는다. 내게 주어진 이 하루와 지금 눈앞에 있는 이 사람에게 완전히 집중하며 살아간다.” 저도 주말에는 텔레그램에 자주 들어오지 않는 편입니다. 다른 …
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Persona_Identity. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Persona” (@Persona_Identity), 184 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Persona_Identity.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.