Science — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 48% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
23 measurements spanning 80 days, net -176. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,792–8,023 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 23
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
25 Oct 2026, 21:28
7,819
-1
23 Oct 2026, 06:25
7,820
-4
20 Oct 2026, 07:55
7,824
-10
17 Oct 2026, 08:37
7,834
-8
14 Oct 2026, 13:40
7,842
-3
10 Oct 2026, 23:42
7,845
-8
5 Oct 2026, 02:42
7,853
-23
26 Sept 2026, 15:59
7,876
-12
17 Sept 2026, 23:37
7,888
-12
13 Sept 2026, 18:59
7,900
-6
9 Sept 2026, 23:36
7,906
-17
4 Sept 2026, 21:16
7,923
-14
31 Aug 2026, 23:57
7,937
-4
28 Aug 2026, 19:53
7,941
-10
26 Aug 2026, 04:26
7,951
-10
23 Aug 2026, 02:08
7,961
-7
20 Aug 2026, 00:43
7,968
-3
17 Aug 2026, 10:26
7,971
-5
13 Aug 2026, 15:35
7,976
-6
10 Aug 2026, 10:48
7,982
first reading
Engagement
132 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 20 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 132 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
1h 14m
Average length
1m 42s
Measured directly from 44 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
529 reactions across 88 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
228
43.1%
❤
170
32.1%
🔥
32
6.05%
👌
29
5.48%
💔
13
2.46%
👎
10
1.89%
✍
9
1.70%
🤔
9
1.70%
🤯
8
1.51%
💯
6
1.13%
👏
5
0.945%
😁
4
0.756%
🤬
2
0.378%
❤🔥
1
0.189%
😐
1
0.189%
😱
1
0.189%
🥰
1
0.189%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 89 of the 132 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 529 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 132 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🚀برای تشخیص موشکهای سوخت مایع از سوخت جامد میتوان به چند نکته دقت کرد
۱ـ ویژگیهای ظاهری
۲ـ تجهیزات جانبی پیش از پرتاب
۳ـ مشخصات دود و شعله خروجی موشک
🚦اما مهمترین راه تشخیص در تصاویر پرتاب، شکل شعله و دود حاصل از خروجی موتور است.
موشکهای سوخت جامد معمولاً خط دود بسیار غلیظ، سفید و فشردهای تولید میکنند که به دلیل وجود ذرات فلزی مانند پودر آلومینیوم #ALدر ترکیب سوخت است.
🚦 در مقابل، خروجی موشکهای سوخت مایع…
🚀 یکی از دوستان در مورد مسابقه پرسیدند که نحوه تشخیص سوخت مایع و جامد در تصویر شلیک موشک ها را نمیدانند
این دو تصویر را یکی دیگر از اعضا برای ایشان فرستادند و این روحیه قابل تقدیر است اما توضیح مختصری برای تشخیص دو موتور که شاید برای خیلی از دوستان سئوال باشد
#سوخت
@fatehaneasman
🚀نقطه عطف برنامه موشکی کره شمالی
🧩موشک هواسونگ ۱۸ یکی از پیشرفتهترین و استراتژیکترین موشکهای بالستیک قارهپیمای کره شمالی است که نقطه عطفی در برنامه موشکی این کشور محسوب میشود.
بزرگترین ویژگی و تفاوت عمده این موشک نسبت به نسلهای قبلی مانند هواسونگ ۱۵ و ۱۷، استفاده از پیشرانه سوخت جامد سه مرحلهای است.
🛑استفاده از سوخت جامد به این معناست که موشک نیازی به سوختگیری زمانبر پیش از پرتاب ندارد و میتواند برای …
🚀 ادامه به نسلهای جدیدتر پرداخته و موشک هواسونگ ۱۶ محصول سال ۲۰۲۴ با برد ۵۵۰۰ کیلومتر را معرفی میکند که مجهز به کلاهک گلایدر فوقصوت با قابلیت مانور میانمسیر برای عبور از سامانههای پدافندی است.
پس از آن، موشک غولپیکر هواسونگ ۱۷ معروف به هیولا با برد ۱۵ هزار کیلومتر و پرتابگر سنگین ۲۲ چرخ نمایش داده میشود.
⚔ در بخشهای پایانی نیز موشک هواسونگ ۱۸ به عنوان نخستین موشک قارهپیمای سوخت جامد کره شمالی با برد ۱۵ هز…
🚦از هواسانگ ۱۲ تا ۱۹ ....
🚀 مرور و مقایسه سیر تحول و پیشرفت بزرگترین موشکهای بالستیک و قارهپیمای کره شمالی از خانواده «هواسونگ» میپردازد.
در ابتدای ویدیو، موشک هواسونگ ۱۲ معرفی میشود که در سال ۲۰۱۷ آزمایش شد و ۵۷۵۰ کیلومتر برد دارد. سپس موشک هواسونگ ۱۴ با برد ۹۵۰۰ کیلومتر به عنوان اولین موشک قارهپیمای واقعی کره شمالی که توانایی رسیدن به آلاسکا را داشت مطرح میگردد. در ادامه همان سال، هواسونگ ۱۵ با برد ۱۲ هزار…
🚀 چند سال قبل در طی نوشتن پست در مورد خانم متخصصی که پیشنهاد جذب از خارج کشور داشت و در کشور ماند از ایشان یاد کردیم ، اما چون آن زمان ایشان در حال فعالیت بودند از درج نامشان معذور بودیم ، افسوس که این نوشته ها هم جبران زحمات ایشان نمیشود
پست مورد نظر را در نوشته های قدیمی میتوانید پیدا کنید
روحشان شاد
#شهدای_موشکی
#شهیده_مهسا_طاهری
@fatehaneasman
🕊 شهید گمنام موشکی
شهیده دکتر مهسا طاهری
از نخبه های فعال در صنعت موشکی که هنوز گمنام ماندهاست
#موشکی_ایران
#شهیده_مهسا_طاهری
#شهدای_موشکی
@fatehaneasman
سامانه های مختلف اژدر مارک ۴۸
شامل مخزن سوخت، بخش هدایتی سرجنگی و تجهیزات مکانیکی بخش انتهایی
#اژدر
✅@Fatehaneasman
Signed Fazeli
Showing the 12 most recent of 132 posts we hold for @fatehaneasman. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@fatehaneasman edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
8 August 2026
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
اطلاعات نظامى🇮🇷MILITARY INFO @MILITARYINFO · 19,533 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 1 October 2026
ایران من، امید و آگاهی @Iran_Omid_va_Agahi · 19,642 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 23 September 2026
راه امنیت @amenitMedia · 54,584 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 10 September 2026
سپاه قدس @Qods_org · 18,907 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 3 October 2026
مقاومت تا ظهور @moghavemattazohur · 22,500 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 25 September 2026
باهم زندگی میکنیم💙 @easylifeir · 27,124 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 19 September 2026
بالستیک @balestiknews · 21,533 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 22 September 2026
ظهور نزدیک است ... @Zohour_I12 · 30,882 Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 7 September 2026
(تحلیل نظامی و اخبار جنگ) MilitaryToday.IR @MILITARYTODAYIR · 25,101 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 19 September 2026
🇮🇷یه جای خاص🇮🇷 @jaykhas · 25,823 Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 13 September 2026
Iranian Naval Force @Navy_Iranian · 20,743 Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 29 September 2026
امپراتوری مقاومت @mojahedin_iran · 28,390 Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 9 September 2026
تجهیزات نظامی @tajhizat_nezami2017 · 23,164 Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 16 September 2026
🇮🇷Defenders Plus+ @defenders_plus · 29,815 Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 8 September 2026
GENERAL @General_persiian · 34,652 Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 3 September 2026
Military Fact | میلیتاری فکت @military_factt · 22,441 Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 21 September 2026
اخبار تازه @Akhbare_tazeh · 27,314 Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 10 September 2026
🚀🇮🇷سلاح مدیا🇮🇷✈️ @Selahmedia · 28,358 Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 9 September 2026
شبکه انصار | Ansar Network @ansar_network · 18,895 Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 4 October 2026
🇮🇷Defender IRAN🇮🇷 @irDefender · 99,879 Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 22 August 2026
سپاه پاسداران @sepahp_ir · 35,640 Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 2 September 2026
تفسیرگر | علیرضا تقوی نیا @taghaviniaa · 24,363 Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 17 September 2026
آ سِد مهدی @A_seyed_mahdi · 32,822 Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 4 September 2026
فاتحین نیوز-اخبارجنگ @fateheinn_news · 92,285 Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 17 August 2026
This channel appears in 32 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“فاتحان آسمان” (@fatehaneasman), 7,819 subscribers as measured 25 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fatehaneasman.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.