10 measurements spanning 22 days, net -54. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,933–8,004 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
28 Aug 2026, 19:53
7,941
-10
26 Aug 2026, 04:26
7,951
-10
23 Aug 2026, 02:08
7,961
-7
20 Aug 2026, 00:43
7,968
-3
17 Aug 2026, 10:26
7,971
-5
13 Aug 2026, 15:35
7,976
-6
10 Aug 2026, 10:48
7,982
-14
7 Aug 2026, 13:21
7,996
+1
6 Aug 2026, 17:45
7,995
no change
6 Aug 2026, 17:36
7,995
first reading
Engagement
132 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 20 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
3.80%
avg views ÷ 7,941 subscribers
Avg views / post
302
131 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.84%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
132
of 132 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 89 of 131 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held
132 (4 August 2026 – 28 August 2026)
Views total
39,571
Reactions total
529
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
28 Aug 2026, 19:45 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
1h 14m
Average length
1m 42s
Measured directly from 44 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
529 reactions across 88 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
228
43.1%
❤
170
32.1%
🔥
32
6.05%
👌
29
5.48%
💔
13
2.46%
👎
10
1.89%
✍
9
1.70%
🤔
9
1.70%
🤯
8
1.51%
💯
6
1.13%
👏
5
0.945%
😁
4
0.756%
🤬
2
0.378%
❤🔥
1
0.189%
😐
1
0.189%
😱
1
0.189%
🥰
1
0.189%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 89 of the 132 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 529reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 132 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🚀برای تشخیص موشکهای سوخت مایع از سوخت جامد میتوان به چند نکته دقت کرد
۱ـ ویژگیهای ظاهری
۲ـ تجهیزات جانبی پیش از پرتاب
۳ـ مشخصات دود و شعله خروجی موشک
🚦اما مهمترین راه تشخیص در تصاویر پرتاب، شکل شعله و دود حاصل از خروجی موتور است.
موشکهای سوخت جامد معمولاً خط دود بسیار غلیظ، سفید و فشردهای تولید میکنند که به دلیل وجود ذرات فلزی مانند پودر آلومینیوم #ALدر ترکیب سوخت است.
🚦 در مقابل، خروجی موشکهای سوخت مایع…
🚀 یکی از دوستان در مورد مسابقه پرسیدند که نحوه تشخیص سوخت مایع و جامد در تصویر شلیک موشک ها را نمیدانند
این دو تصویر را یکی دیگر از اعضا برای ایشان فرستادند و این روحیه قابل تقدیر است اما توضیح مختصری برای تشخیص دو موتور که شاید برای خیلی از دوستان سئوال باشد
#سوخت
@fatehaneasman
🚀نقطه عطف برنامه موشکی کره شمالی
🧩موشک هواسونگ ۱۸ یکی از پیشرفتهترین و استراتژیکترین موشکهای بالستیک قارهپیمای کره شمالی است که نقطه عطفی در برنامه موشکی این کشور محسوب میشود.
بزرگترین ویژگی و تفاوت عمده این موشک نسبت به نسلهای قبلی مانند هواسونگ ۱۵ و ۱۷، استفاده از پیشرانه سوخت جامد سه مرحلهای است.
🛑استفاده از سوخت جامد به این معناست که موشک نیازی به سوختگیری زمانبر پیش از پرتاب ندارد و میتواند برای …
🚀 ادامه به نسلهای جدیدتر پرداخته و موشک هواسونگ ۱۶ محصول سال ۲۰۲۴ با برد ۵۵۰۰ کیلومتر را معرفی میکند که مجهز به کلاهک گلایدر فوقصوت با قابلیت مانور میانمسیر برای عبور از سامانههای پدافندی است.
پس از آن، موشک غولپیکر هواسونگ ۱۷ معروف به هیولا با برد ۱۵ هزار کیلومتر و پرتابگر سنگین ۲۲ چرخ نمایش داده میشود.
⚔ در بخشهای پایانی نیز موشک هواسونگ ۱۸ به عنوان نخستین موشک قارهپیمای سوخت جامد کره شمالی با برد ۱۵ هز…
🚦از هواسانگ ۱۲ تا ۱۹ ....
🚀 مرور و مقایسه سیر تحول و پیشرفت بزرگترین موشکهای بالستیک و قارهپیمای کره شمالی از خانواده «هواسونگ» میپردازد.
در ابتدای ویدیو، موشک هواسونگ ۱۲ معرفی میشود که در سال ۲۰۱۷ آزمایش شد و ۵۷۵۰ کیلومتر برد دارد. سپس موشک هواسونگ ۱۴ با برد ۹۵۰۰ کیلومتر به عنوان اولین موشک قارهپیمای واقعی کره شمالی که توانایی رسیدن به آلاسکا را داشت مطرح میگردد. در ادامه همان سال، هواسونگ ۱۵ با برد ۱۲ هزار…
🚀 چند سال قبل در طی نوشتن پست در مورد خانم متخصصی که پیشنهاد جذب از خارج کشور داشت و در کشور ماند از ایشان یاد کردیم ، اما چون آن زمان ایشان در حال فعالیت بودند از درج نامشان معذور بودیم ، افسوس که این نوشته ها هم جبران زحمات ایشان نمیشود
پست مورد نظر را در نوشته های قدیمی میتوانید پیدا کنید
روحشان شاد
#شهدای_موشکی
#شهیده_مهسا_طاهری
@fatehaneasman
🕊 شهید گمنام موشکی
شهیده دکتر مهسا طاهری
از نخبه های فعال در صنعت موشکی که هنوز گمنام ماندهاست
#موشکی_ایران
#شهیده_مهسا_طاهری
#شهدای_موشکی
@fatehaneasman
سامانه های مختلف اژدر مارک ۴۸
شامل مخزن سوخت، بخش هدایتی سرجنگی و تجهیزات مکانیکی بخش انتهایی
#اژدر
✅@Fatehaneasman
Signed Fazeli
Showing the 12 most recent of 132 posts we hold for @fatehaneasman. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@fatehaneasman edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
8 August 2026
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
🇮🇷Defender IRAN🇮🇷 @irDefender · 59,868 Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 22 August 2026
فاتحین نیوز-اخبارجنگ @fateheinn_news · 90,904 Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 17 August 2026
🇮🇷 اخبار جنگ آمریکا | گردان سم @gordanesam313 · 69,754 Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 20 August 2026
تحولات جهان @tahavolatworld · 55,640 Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 23 August 2026
اخبار سوریه به فارسی 𓂆 @SyrianToPersian · 45,222 Telegram ranks this channel #90 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 27 August 2026
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“فاتحان آسمان” (@fatehaneasman), 7,941 subscribers as measured 28 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fatehaneasman.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.