Channel
@Dastyarebartar
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
14,282subscribers
+16 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001114258158 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Dastyarebartar |
| Description | قدیمیترین و باسابقه ترین گروه مشاوره رزیدنتی و پیش کارورزی در کشور با بیش از ۹ سال تجربه و خروجی بیش از ۵۰۰ رتبه سه رقمی و دو رقمی دستیاری تنها گروه مشاوره رزیدنتی با افتخار خروجی رتبه ۱ دستیاری مشاوره: @dastyarebartar1 خرید کتاب : @dastyarebartar2 |
| Created | Between 1 February 2017 and 28 February 2019— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Dastyarebartar |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 16:26 | 14,282 | +3 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 18:35 | 14,279 | +8 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 20:57 | 14,271 | +1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 17:42 | 14,270 | +8 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 16:52 | 14,262 | -5 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:00 | 14,267 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:01 | 14,266 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 24 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 17 (24 July 2026 – 13 August 2026) |
| Views total | 79,090 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Aug 2026, 16:41 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
در دور اول چجوری به هرکتاب اپروچ کنیم که بتونیم در دور آخر هرکیوبی رو در یک روز یا نصف روز بخونیم ؟ 📽 دکتر محمدرضا باتوانی رتبه ۹۳ آزمون دستیاری رزیدنت رادیولوژی اصفهان مشاور ارشد دستیاربرتر @Dastyarebartar
هر کانال و موسسه ای راه افتاده و دنبال اینن یه پولی از بچه ها و همکارا بگیرن و به قول خودشون انتخاب رشته کنند براشون . ما که این همه سال کار کردیم این همه سال رتبه برتر داشتیم امسال هم کلی از شاگردامون نمرات خفن آوردن پارسال هم نزدیک ترین تخمین رتبه رو دادیم و بهترین انتخاب رشته رو داشتیم و با رضایت نزدیک ۱۰۰ درصدی انتخاب رشته کردیم این همه هم تجربه داریم از روزی که آزمون برگزار شد داریم فکر میکنیم چجوری بهترین کمک …
در کلید نهایی سوالات آزمون دستیاری ، ۵ سوال دو جوابه و ۵ سوال به طور کامل حذف شد . تمامی داوطلبین خصوصی مشاوره خانواده دستیاربرتر در سال گذشته طبق کلید جدید نمرات خودشون رو به ادمین اعلام کنند تا در جلسه رایگان انتخاب رشته و پرسش و پاسخ شرکت کنند. @dastyarebartar
تخمین رتبه تیم علمی دستیاربرتر برای آزمون دستیاری ۱۴۰۵ نمره ۵۳۰ : رتبه ۲۳ نمره ۵۰۰ : رتبه ۱۱۵ نمره ۴۷۰ : رتبه ۳۸۰ نمره ۴۴۰ : رتبه ۷۹۰ نمره ۴۰۰ : رتبه ۱۶۴۰ نمره ۳۵۰ : رتبه ۳۳۰۰ تبصره مهم ۱ : با اینکه میشد مثل پارسال تخمین رتبه را ، رتبه به رتبه اعلام کنیم اما به دلیل عدم وجود کمپلیانس مناسب در داوطلبین و شرایط روحی نامناسب ناشی از جو ایجاد شده توسط عده ای سودجو تصمیم گرفتیم تنها کات اف های مهم را اعلام کنیم و ه…
ما بر اساس خود رتبه های سنجش تخمین میزنیم نه بر اساس فرضیات شخصی خودمان بمانند دیگران و همین امر باعث شده تا هر ساله نزدیکترین تخمین رتبه را داشته باشیم . بعلاوه بازه های نمره را دقیقا مشابه سال گذشته انتخاب کردیم تا بتوانیم شبیه سازی را بر اساس رتبه های واقعی سنجش پارسال انجام دهیم . در تخمین سه مرحله اصلی وجود دارد که باعث بشود از تفسیر به رای خودداری گردد: ۱- استفاده از رتبه های واقعی سال گذشته ۲- مقایسه با نظ…
دو تصویر شامل نتایج نظرسنجی در سال ۱۴۰۴ و نظرسنجی امسال ۱۴۰۵
تخمین رتبه خانواده دستیاربرتر فردا منتشر خواهد شد . مانند پارسال ان شاءالله نزدیک ترین تخمین رتبه به رتبه های واقعی را خواهیم داشت . همواره دقت را چاشنی کار خود کرده ایم .
سلام خدمت خانواده دستیاربرتر. ما هم به مانند همکارانمان در مدیک سنتر انزجار خود را از رفتارهای عوام فریبانه برخی که خود را "استاد" این حوزه می دانند اعلام می کنیم. و متاسفیم که با چنین افرادی هم صنف هستیم. پزشک عمومی که در دهه ششم زندگی خود است و خود را استاد می نامد باید دست جوانان را بگیرد نه آن که این چنین بی ادبانه و توهین آمیز رفتار کند....
❇️ با این پیام کاملاً موافقم و واقعاً متأسفم که هنوز هم برخی کانالها و فعالان حوزه پزشکی، درک درستی از رقابت سالم و اخلاق حرفهای ندارند. اختلاف نظر کاملاً طبیعی است، اما اینکه فردی به خودش اجازه بدهد برای تخریب همکاران از ادبیات توهینآمیز استفاده کند، نه قابل قبول است و نه در شأن جامعه پزشکی. قبلاً هم بارها تأکید کردهام که در این حوزه، توصیه میکنم بیشتر افرادی رو دنبال کنین که هویت، سابقه و عملکردشان برای همه …
باتوجه به کلید اعلامی سنجش نمره شما در کدام بازه زیر قرار دارد :
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
کلید های اولیه سنجش اومد . دقت کنید کلید اولیه ست و امکان تغییر داره . ولی هرکس نمرش رو حساب نکرده بره حساب کنه با همین کلید فعلا
❌ظرفیت پذیرش مرداد ماه به اتمام رسید ❌ همکارانی که شماره کارت دریافت کردند اما واریز نکردند ، لطفا دیگر واریز نکنند . در صورت واریز، مبلغ برای آنها بازگشت داده خواهدشد .
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @Dastyarebartar. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
باتوجه به کلید اعلامی سنجش نمره شما در کدام بازه زیر قرار دارد :
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 13 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 517,880 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Dastyarebartar | دستیاربرتر” (@Dastyarebartar), 14,282 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Dastyarebartar.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.