7 measurements spanning 13 days, net -33. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,857–8,901 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
19 Aug 2026, 07:05
8,862
-3
16 Aug 2026, 07:05
8,865
-9
13 Aug 2026, 03:04
8,874
-12
9 Aug 2026, 17:03
8,886
-10
6 Aug 2026, 06:30
8,896
+1
6 Aug 2026, 03:00
8,895
no change
5 Aug 2026, 23:26
8,895
first reading
Engagement
58 posts held, back to 23 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 20 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
7.87%
avg views ÷ 8,862 subscribers
Avg views / post
697
45 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.937%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
46
of 58 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 43 of 45 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 20 August 2026
Posts held
58 (23 December 2025 – 20 August 2026)
Views total
31,372
Reactions total
284
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
20 Aug 2026, 17:37 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈2,050
Videos
≈503
Links
≈1,540
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 20 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
419 reactions across 53 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 59.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
248
59.2%
👍
60
14.3%
🔥
54
12.9%
🙏
24
5.73%
😁
15
3.58%
😍
9
2.15%
👏
4
0.955%
😱
2
0.477%
🤔
2
0.477%
😭
1
0.239%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 55 of the 58 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 433reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 58 most recent posts we hold, published 23 December 2025 to 20 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🔹اطلاعیه
🔖با سلام و خسته نباشید خدمت همه عزیزان شرکت کننده در وبینار waze
⬇️لطفا به موارد زیر توجه بفرمایید:
🔹لطفا در صورتی که پس از وبینار به صورت شخصی به مدرس وبینار ، دکتر عزیزخانی ، پیام دادید، مجددا یک پیام یادآور ارسال بفرمایید. با توجه به حجم ارسالی پیام های حاضران و غایبان شب گذشته به همراه پیام های روتین مخاطبان عادی در کنار خستگی برگزاری ۴ ساعت وبینار ، ممکن است برخی پیام ها به بخش پایین چت ها منتقل شد…
🔹وبینار Waze: مسیربندی جامع آزمون علوم پایه
👍این وبینار چهار ساعته برگرفته از تجربیات مشاوره با بیش از ۱۰۰۰ دانشجو در طول چند سال برگزار خواهد شد.
🔹آگاهی از مسیر موفقیت در آزمون علوم پایه، این روزها برای شما ضروری است!
⬇️در پایان این وبینار:
✔️ با ویژگیهای کلیدی دوران جمعبندی آشنا خواهید شد.
✔️ با مباحث و ساختار سوالات آزمون آشنا خواهید شد.
✔️ بهترین منابع جهت جمعبندی معرفی خواهند شد.
✔️ مجهز به ابزارهای ویژ…
🔹برنامه های ما بعد وبینار چیه ؟
🔹نکات درسی بر اساس مهم ترین سرفصل های عنوان شده در وبینار
🔹راهنماهای مشاورهای بر اساس اصول مطرح شده در وبینار
🔹مهمترین تست های تکراری آزمون علوم پایه
⭐️ما کنارت هستیم !
🚩گام اول: وبینار waze
📆چهارشنبه ۲۸ مرداد
⏰ساعت ۱۶:۰۰ الی ۲۰:۰۰
❤️ @oloom_payeh
▶️درباره وبینار از ما چیا پرسیدی؟
🦷وبینار برای بچه های دندونپزشکی هم مناسبه؟
بله. این وبینار هم برای دانشجویان پزشکی و هم برای دانشجویان دندانپزشکی طراحی شدهاست
❌تو این وبینار میگید چی حذف کنیم؟
ما تو این وبینار ۲ تا کمک به شما میکنیم
اول بهتون میگیم با توجه به شرایط شما استراتژی مطالعاتیتون باید چی باشه
دوم مباحثی که باید از هر درس بخونید و احتمال سوال بودنش بالاست رو برای شما مشخص میکنیم
💡این وبینار با صفر…
🔹اسلاید های وبینار چه شکلیه؟
🔴برعکس خیلیا، ما آپدیتیم! نشون به اون نشون که یه سری هنوز دارن جدول و اطلاعات قدیمی وبینار سال پیش ما رو میذارن😉
🚩بیش از ۱۰۰ اسلاید بررسی ریز بودجهبندی درس به درس آزمون علوم پایه
🚩اولویت بندی مباحث ویژه دوران جمع بندی
🚩بررسی روش های مرور هر درس بر اساس مرجعترین مقالات آموزش پزشکی
⁉️میخوای بدونی اول باید تو هر مبحث تست بزنی یا مرور کنی؟ مامنتظرتیم!
🔗جهت شرکت در وبینار کلیک کن!
🗓چه…
👀 میدونستی وبینار یه جزوه خفن هم داره ؟
👈فعلا بیا یه صفحشو ببین تا برسیم به وبینار
😍تو این جزوه در عرض ۴ ساعت نیمی از فرایند برنامه ریزی برای یکماه باقی مونده رو انجام میدی
🗓 چهارشنبه، ۲۸ مرداد
⏰ ساعت ۱۶ الی ۲۰
🔗لینک ثبت نام
❤️ @oloom_payeh |
👀 ۸ تا جواب مهم که قراره تو وبینار waze از ما بگیری😇
🟡اگه جواب سوالات باکتری شناسی رو نمیدونستی ، چجوری گزینه درست رو بزنی؟
🟠چجوری بیش از ۱۰۰ ساعت در مطالعه آناتومی صرفهجویی کنی؟
🔴۱۲ تا سوال قطعی فیزیولوژی آزمون چیه؟
🟣قوانین احتمالات درباره سوالات بیوشیمی امسال چی میگه؟
🔵چجوری در بافتشناسی زباله نخوانیم؟
🟢نقشه راه زبان علوم پایه چیه ؟
⚫️چی حذف کنم که نمرم کم نشه ؟
⚪️هوش مصنوعی چطوری نمرتو بیشتر میکنه ؟
…
⁉️آیا وبینار waze یک وبینار تبلیغاتیه؟
❌نه اصلا ! یکی از مهم ترین مزایای برگزاری این وبینار اینه که در بخش منابع ، ما به صورت جامع و کامل تمام منابع مورد نیاز برای جمع بندی رو توضیح میدیم و حتی میگیم کدوم مجموعه برای کدوم درس بهتره!
✔️این وبینار اصلا تا ۲ هفته پیش تو برنامه اولیه دکترآباد نبود و ما آماده برنامه ریزی برای شروع قوی برای آزمون اسفند بودیم اما حجم ابهامات بچه ها برای شیوه برنامه ریزی پس از تعویق باعث …
📌 چرا بعضیها با زمان کمتر نتیجه بهتری میگیرند؟
🤫راز کار، زیاد خواندن نیست؛ درست خواندن و تصمیمگیری هوشمندانه است.
🔹 اولویتبندی میکنند
بهجای خواندن همهچیز، روی مباحث مهم و پربازده تمرکز میکنند.
🔹 هدف مشخص دارند
میدانند در هر مرحله دقیقاً دنبال چه چیزی هستند؛ نه فقط «بخوانند».
🔹 برنامهی واقعی و قابل اجرا دارند
حجم را متناسب با زمان و شرایط خودشان تنظیم میکنند.
🔹 تست و مرور را جدی میگیرند
بهجای صرفاً خ…
🔹چرا نباید وبینار WAZE رو از دست داد؟
💥تدریس اصول برنامهریزی آزمون علوم پایه و امکان فیدبک برنامه طراحی شده به وسیله دانشجو توسط مشاور
👈البته میتونی بیای ماهی هم بگیری اما ما بهت ماهیگیری یاد میدهیم😁
📌آموزش گایدلاین برنامهریزی ویژه آزمون علوم پایه
📌ارائه نکات تکمیلی در شیوه طراحی استرتژی مناسب
📌امکان بررسی رایگان برنامهریزی مطالعاتی دانشجویان توسط مشاور
🔗اگه میخوای بازخورد بیشتری از بچه ها رو کنار اطلاعات کا…
❤4👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 58 posts we hold for @oloom_payeh. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 58 most recent posts we hold, published 23 December 2025 to 20 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,079,699 of 1,570,450entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Medical_PDF💉 @pdfvahidzali · 88,186 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 18 August 2026
دانشجویان علوم پزشکی @medicall_students · 75,129 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 19 August 2026
Medical University 🏛⚕ @medicaluniversity · 81,931 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 18 August 2026
کار دانشجویی علوم پزشکی | مدیلنسر @medilancer · 93,212 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 18 August 2026
Medical Jozveh @medical_jozveh_channel · 121,969 Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 18 August 2026
توییتر دانشجویان علوم پزشکی @medtweeet · 84,369 Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 18 August 2026
MediPoints @medipoints · 75,923 Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 19 August 2026
This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“علوم پایه پزشکی و دندانپزشکی” (@oloom_payeh), 8,862 subscribers as measured 19 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/oloom_payeh.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.