🎙️ دکتر راضیه فارسی «کی مطالعه رو شروع کنیم؟» برای: ✅ شرکتکنندگان آزمون رزیدنتی امسال ✅ همکارانی که اولین بار وارد مسیر آزمون میشوند. 🌐 @drfarsimoshaver

Channel
گروه مشاوره دستیاری دکتر فارسی
@drfarsimoshaver
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
4,173subscribers
-293 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002184792334 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @drfarsimoshaver |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/drfarsimoshaver |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Aug 2026, 11:53 | 4,173 | -69 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 23:48 | 4,242 | -85 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 16:52 | 4,327 | -127 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:04 | 4,454 | -12 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 08:16 | 4,466 | first reading |
Engagement
21 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 7 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 55.2%
- avg views ÷ 4,173 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 2,300
- 21 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 21
- of 21 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 21 (27 July 2026 – 8 August 2026) |
| Views total | 48,342 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 18:04 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 36m 22s
- Average length
- 12m 07s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
🏆 گروه مشاوره رزیدنتی دکتر فارسی 🎙 ویس های معرفی رشتههای تخصص : برای یک انتخاب آگاهانه بشنوید👇 🔹 داخلی | دکتر ژیان 🔹 جراحی | دکتر بابایی 🔹 جراحی | دکتر موسوی 🔹 زنان و زایمان | دکتر محمدبیگی 🔹 اطفال | دکتر عباسپور 🔹 پوست و مو | دکتر فارسی 🔹 رادیولوژی | دکتر سالاری 🔹 چشمپزشکی | دکتر صادقی 🔹 طب فیزیکی | دکتر آرامش 🔹 قلب و عروق | دکتر محمودیمقدم 🔹 نورولوژی | دکتر شمس 🔹 ارتوپدی | دکتر قلی زاده 🔹 روانپزشکی | دکتر م…
✅تغییرات منابع آزمون سال ۱۴۰۶( دوره ۵۴) نسبت به آزمون سال ۱۴۰۵: 🔹تغییر ادیشن: 🔘 عفونی از هاریسون ۲۰۲۲ به هاریسون ۲۰۲۵ 🔘 اورولوژی از کتاب سیم فروش ۱۴۰۲ به ۱۴۰۴ 🔘 جراحی عمومی از لارنس ۲۰۱۹ به لارنس ۲۰۲۵ 🔘 قسمت هاریسون داخلی از هاریسون۲۰۲۲ به ۲۰۲۵ 🔹تغییر منبع: نورولوژی از کتاب بیماری های مغز واعصاب به امینوف ۲۰۲۱ 🌐 @drfarsimoshaver
توضیح تغییرات منابع رزیدنتی دوره۵۴ 🎙 دکترراضیه فارسی 🔸 چه درس هایی تغییر داشته اند؟ 🔹 چه تغییری باید در نحوه مطالعه ایجاد شود؟ 🌐 @drfarsimoshaver
#انگیزشی موفقیت، حاصل انجام کارهای کوچک ومداوم هست✌️ 🌐 @drfarsimoshaver
همان طور که در تحلیل سوالات گفتم برای این سوال در کتاب ذکر شده که تکثیر پایانه های اعصاب حسی در پاسخ به خارش هست و نه علت اولیه و بنابراین گزینه چهارم هم درست نیست و سوال به درستی حذف شد.👌
#اطلاعیه ✅کلید نهایی آزمون رزیدنتی دوره۵۳ 🌐 @drfarsimoshaver
🌐 برای اطلاع از لایوها، پیج اینستاگرام را دنبال کنید: 🔗 https://instagram.com/dr.farsirazieh 🔗 https://www.instagram.com/dr.rezajian منتظر همراهیتون هستیم. 🌿
🎙 لایو ویژه مشاوره آزمون رزیدنتی و پره اینترنی 📌 از شروع مطالعه تا موفقیت در آزمون؛ مسیر درست کدام است؟ با حضور: دکتر فارسی | دکتر ژیان در این لایو پاسخ میدهیم به: ✅ بهترین زمان شروع مطالعه چه موقع است؟ ✅ اولین قدم بعد از تصمیم برای شروع چیست؟ ✅ بهترین منابع کداماند و از چه منابعی باید دوری کرد؟ ✅ چگونه برنامهریزی کنیم که تا روز آزمون دچار فرسودگی نشویم؟ ✅ روش صحیح مطالعه چیست؟ فقط زیاد خواندن کافی است؟ ✅ مرو…
#رضایت_شما 🔺 مشاوره تک جلسه رزیدنتی دکتر فارسی 🔺 ارائه راهکار جهت رفع نقاط ضعف 🔺ترسیم دقیق نقشه راه 🌐 @drfarsimoshaver
#رضایت_شما 🔺 مشاوره تک جلسه رزیدنتی دکتر فارسی 🔺 ارائه راهکار جهت رفع نقاط ضعف 🔺ترسیم دقیق نقشه راه 🌐 @drfarsimoshaver
✅تغییرات منابع آزمون سال ۱۴۰۶( دوره ۵۴) نسبت به آزمون سال ۱۴۰۵: 🔹تغییر ادیشن: 🔘 عفونی از هاریسون ۲۰۲۲ به هاریسون ۲۰۲۵ 🔘 اورولوژی از کتاب سیم فروش ۱۴۰۲ به ۱۴۰۴ 🔘 جراحی عمومی از لارنس ۲۰۱۹ به لارنس ۲۰۲۵ 🔘 قسمت هاریسون داخلی از هاریسون۲۰۲۲ به ۲۰۲۵ 🔹تغییر منبع: نورولوژی از کتاب بیماری های مغز واعصاب به امینوف ۲۰۲۱ 🌐 @drfarsimoshaver
Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @drfarsimoshaver. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 309,364 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“گروه مشاوره دستیاری دکتر فارسی” (@drfarsimoshaver), 4,173 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/drfarsimoshaver.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.