Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Vardast | وردست

@vardast_ai

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

285subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003921398288
TypeChannel
Username@vardast_ai
Descriptionوردست | دستیار هوشمند پزشکان 🤖 بات وردست: @Vardastai_bot
Created20 June 2026measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/vardast_ai

Growth

2856 Aug 2026, 03:08 — 285 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 23:17 — 285 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 03:086 Aug 2026, 23:17
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 284–286 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Aug 2026, 23:17285no change
6 Aug 2026, 03:08285first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 20 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
212.0%
avg views ÷ 285 subscribers
Avg views / post
604
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.28%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 15 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 9 of 10 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held15 (20 June 20265 August 2026)
Views total6,041
Reactions total72
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 23:17 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
9
Links
10

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

127 reactions across 13 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
6148.0%
🔥3023.6%
❤‍🔥1511.8%
👌43.15%
👏43.15%
💔32.36%
😁32.36%
😍32.36%
🤩21.57%
10.787%
💯10.787%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 127reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 20 June 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 15:17 UTC96 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🚨 اورژانسی‌ها رو جا ننداز، محتمل‌ترها رو درمان کن! ❗️برای هر بیمار دو دسته تشخیص افتراقی داریم: 1️⃣ تشخیص‌های اورژانسی که هرگز نباید جا بیوفتن. 2️⃣ تشخیص‌هایی که محتمل‌ترن. 🔆 توی آخرین آپدیت وَردست، این دو دسته در پیشنهاد تشخیص‌های افتراقی از هم جدا شدن تا شفاف‌تر و دقیق‌تر بتونی از بیمارت مراقبت کنی. 👩🏻‍⚕️ همین الان وردست رو امتحان کن: شروع استفاده از هوش مصنوعی وردست (کاملاً رایگان!) 🆔 @Vardast_ai 🤖 @Vardastai_

3😍2🔥1

2 Aug 2026, 13:00 UTC≈1,290 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🔆 ویزیت بیمار با تو، بقیه‌ش با وَردست! 😥 شده حین ویزیت سوالای مهم یادت برن یا توی نوشتن چیزیو جا بندازی؟ دیگه نگرانشون نباش! 💥 با وردست بیماراتو راحت‌تر، سریع‌تر و با‌دقت‌تر ویزیت کن! ❓وردست چیکار می‌کنه؟ 🔻 نمایش لیست سوالات شرح‌حال و معاینات 🔻 یادآوری سوالات مهم از قلم افتاده 🔻 ارائه شرح‌حال کامل و ساختارمند 🔻 پیشنهاد تشخیص‌های افتراقی مهم و محتمل 👩🏻‍⚕️همین الان وردست رو امتحان کن: شروع استفاده از هوش مصنوعی ورد

3❤‍🔥1👌1

1 Aug 2026, 13:40 UTC258 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026

🔆 وَردست در دسترس قرار گرفت! همراهان عزیز وردست، ضمن تشکر از همراهی صبورانه شما در روزهای اخیر، با برطرف شدن مشکل ارائه‌دهنده زیرساخت، از لحظاتی پیش وردست مجدداً جهت استفاده شما عزیزان در دسترس قرار گرفت ✅ از صبر و همراهی شما صمیمانه سپاسگزاریم 🧡

4❤‍🔥1😁1

28 Jul 2026, 18:23 UTC334 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026

⚠️ مشکل موقتی در دسترسی به وَردست همراهان عزیز وردست، با عرض پوزش، به علت برخی از مشکلات فنی از سمت سرویس‌های ارائه دهنده زیرساخت، دسترسی به وردست در حال حاضر به‌طور موقت محدود شده. در حال پیگیری هستیم تا هر چه زودتر مشکل رو برطرف کنیم. خیلی زود با قابلیت‌ها و آپدیت‌های جدید برمی‌گردیم. از اینکه صبورانه ما رو همراهی می‌کنید، سپاسگزاریم 🧡

5💔2

26 Jul 2026, 17:00 UTC999 views12 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🚀 عملکرد وَردست طی ۲ هفته بعد از لانچ! 🤩 با اعتماد شما پزشکان و همراهان عزیز، مفتخریم اعلام کنیم تنها در طی ۲ هفته از زمان شروع به کار، وردست: 🔺 توسط بیش از ۱۰۰۰ کاربر منحصربه‌فرد امتحان شده 🔺 بیش از ۲۰۰ بار به عنوان دستیار ویزیت مورد استفاده قرار گرفته 🔺 بیش از ۱۰ ساعت صوت گفت‌وگوی ویزیت رو بررسی کرده ☺️ اگر دوست دارید به بهبود هر چه بیشتر وردست کمک کنید: - نظرات، تجربه‌ها و بازخوردهاتون رو با ما در میون بذارید (ا

🔥74😁1

22 Jul 2026, 15:45 UTC478 views9 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

😌 صبحا بیشتر بخواب و دیرتر برو بخش! 😖 تا حالا شده واسه این که بیمارهای جدید رو به‌موقع ویزیت کنی و به راند برسی، صبح خیلی زود وقتی که هنوز هوا تاریکه با استرس از خواب بیدار شی و با عجله راه بیوفتی؟ 😃 وقتی با وَردست می‌تونی ویزیت بیمارها رو سریع‌تر و دقیق‌تر انجام بدی، دیگه نیازی به این همه عجله و اضطراب نیست! 🔆 همین فردا قبل از راند وَردست رو امتحان کن: شروع استفاده از هوش مصنوعی وردست (کاملاً رایگان!) 🆔 @Vardast

5❤‍🔥2👌1🔥1

19 Jul 2026, 16:45 UTC559 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026

‼️ در نیمی از موارد، یه تشخیص مهم از قلم افتاد! در کیسی که مطرح شد، محتمل‌ترین تشخیص‌ها عفونت‌های ویروسی و سینوزیت هستن. اما به عنوان یک پزشک، همیشه قبل از نتیجه‌گیری نهایی باید اول موارد اورژانسی و تهدید‌کننده حیات رو رد کنیم. پزشک درمانگاه بدون در نظر گرفتن و بررسی بیشتر تشخیص مهمی مثل مننژیت، تشخیصش رو نهایی کرد و درمان گذاشت. خیلی از ما هم اگه به جاش بودیم ممکن بود همین کارو کنیم. 💯 ولی با وردست، دیگه هیچ تشخی

5❤‍🔥1🔥1

18 Jul 2026, 18:22 UTC≈1,120 views10 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

❗️هیچ تشخیص مهمی از قلم نمی‌افته! (قابلیت جدید) 🫣 خیلی وقتا حین ویزیت تشخیص‌های مهم و حیاتی نادیده گرفته می‌شن و به‌راحتی ازشون می‌گذریم ... 💥 حالا وردست توی آخرین آپدیت، سوالات و معاینات مهمی که توی ویزیت نادیده گرفته شدن رو یادآوری می‌کنه تا دیگه هیچ تشخیص مهمی از قلم نیوفته! 👩🏻‍⚕️ همین الان آخرین نسخه وردست رو با قابلیت‌های جدیدش امتحان کن: شروع استفاده از هوش مصنوعی وردست (کاملاً رایگان!) 🆔 @Vardast_ai

5👏2❤‍🔥1🔥1😍1

16 Jul 2026, 17:40 UTC474 views10 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Poll

اگه شما جای این پزشک بودید، چیکار می‌کردید؟

  1. با تشخیصش موافقم و درمان خوبی شروع کرده.8%
  2. احتمالاً یه عفونت ویروسی بوده و نیازی به آنتی‌بیوتیک نداشت.31%
  3. قبل از تصمیم‌گیری، چند سوال و معاینه دیگه هم انجام می‌دادم.61%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

🔥62❤‍🔥1💔1

16 Jul 2026, 17:40 UTC433 viewsread 6 August 2026

❓اگه شما بودید، چیکار می‌کردید؟ زمستون پارسال بیمار جوونی با شکایت از سردرد و تب اومده بود درمانگاه. می‌گفت از دیشب سردرد دارم؛ تب، بدن درد و یکمی هم تهوع و گلو درد خفیف همراهش داشت. بیماری زمینه‌ای خاصی نداشت و دارویی هم مصرف نمی‌کرد. در معاینه، بیمار هوشیار بود، فشار خون و نبضش طبیعی بود و فقط تب ۳۸ درجه داشت. یافته نگران‌کننده‌ی دیگه‌ای هم به چشم نمی‌خورد. 👩🏻‍⚕️ پزشک درمانگاه بر اساس این یافته‌ها، تشخیص سینوزیت

14 Jul 2026, 17:49 UTC516 views11 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

❓دیگه چی بپرسم؟ 🙆🏻‍♂️ تا حالا شده وسط ویزیت بیمار واست سوال بشه دیگه چی باید بپرسم و ذهنت خالی شه؟ 💥 تو آخرین آپدیت، وردست سوالات مهمِ هر بخش شرح‌حال رو بهت میگه تا یه شرح حال کامل بگیری و چیزی از قلم نیوفته. 💯 با وردست کامل و با جزئیات شرح حال بگیر! 👩🏻‍⚕️ همین الان آخرین نسخه وردست رو امتحان کن: شروع استفاده از هوش مصنوعی وردست (کاملاً رایگان!) 🆔 @Vardast_ai

7🤩2❤‍🔥1😁1

12 Jul 2026, 17:42 UTC566 views12 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

یکی از مهم‌ترین چیزایی که باعث می‌شه یه بیمار از ویزیتش راضی بیرون بیاد، این نیست که پزشکش چقدر باسواد و درسخون بوده. چیزی که بیشتر توی ذهن بیمار می‌مونه اینه که احساس کنه دیده شده، شنیده شده و پزشک تمام حواسش به اونه و وقتی ویزیت تموم میشه میگه: «دکتر واقعاً به حرفم گوش داد!» ولی الان خیلی وقتا در حالی که بیمار داره از دردش می‌گه، پزشک هم‌زمان سرش توی پرونده‌ست، داره تایپ می‌کنه یا یادداشت برمی‌داره تا چیزی از قلم

8❤‍🔥2👌2

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @vardast_ai. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

16 Jul 2026, 17:40 UTCAnonymous Quiz74 voters

اگه شما جای این پزشک بودید، چیکار می‌کردید؟

  1. با تشخیصش موافقم و درمان خوبی شروع کرده.8%
  2. احتمالاً یه عفونت ویروسی بوده و نیازی به آنتی‌بیوتیک نداشت.31%
  3. قبل از تصمیم‌گیری، چند سوال و معاینه دیگه هم انجام می‌دادم.61%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 20 June 2026 to 5 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 11,045 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 18 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Vardast | وردست” (@vardast_ai), 285 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vardast_ai.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.