🤯 سطح پاسخ های ورژن جدید گوربک(دستیار مطالعه مدوفست) در آپدیت فردا عملا بجز شوخی دستی، در تمام مداخلات دیگری که ممکنه وارد شده
❤29🔥17🤩2😍1😎1

Channel
@medofast_balini
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
35,224subscribers
+3,144 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002048012351 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @medofast_balini |
| Description | مِدوفَست دستیار هوشمند دانشجویان و فارغالتحصیلان پزشکی🎓 🏦بانک رایگان سوالات کشوری و تألیفی برای آمادگی در آزمونهای پره اینترنی و دستیاری: 🌐https://medofast.ir/main-menu 🧑🏻💻 پشتیبانی: @MedofastSupport |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 30 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 35 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 30 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/medofast_balini |
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Sept 2026, 05:55 | 35,224 | +1,040 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 03:36 | 34,184 | +72 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 21:38 | 34,112 | +135 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 03:20 | 33,977 | +78 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 07:20 | 33,899 | +107 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 00:21 | 33,792 | +78 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 20:20 | 33,714 | +203 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 08:37 | 33,511 | +90 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 20:37 | 33,421 | +81 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 19:43 | 33,340 | +89 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 17:04 | 33,251 | +65 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 19:35 | 33,186 | +65 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 18:38 | 33,121 | +48 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 17:13 | 33,073 | +20 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 18:25 | 33,053 | +63 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 20:54 | 32,990 | +82 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 18:22 | 32,908 | +37 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 20:33 | 32,871 | +50 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 05:37 | 32,821 | +67 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 14:07 | 32,754 | first reading |
495 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 98 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 495 (3 August 2026 – 2 October 2026) |
| Views total | 606,089 |
| Reactions total | 3,747 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 2 Oct 2026, 19:33 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 2 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
7,336 reactions across 480 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 3,591 | 49.0% | |
| 🔥 | 2,926 | 39.9% | |
| 🤣 | 516 | 7.03% | |
| 😍 | 158 | 2.15% | |
| 😎 | 67 | 0.913% | |
| 🤩 | 42 | 0.573% | |
| 🤝 | 24 | 0.327% | |
| 🥰 | 12 | 0.164% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 492 of the 495 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7,465 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 495 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 2 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🤯 سطح پاسخ های ورژن جدید گوربک(دستیار مطالعه مدوفست) در آپدیت فردا عملا بجز شوخی دستی، در تمام مداخلات دیگری که ممکنه وارد شده
❤29🔥17🤩2😍1😎1
📝 برنامه آزمون ها و آزمونک های های تالیفی مدوفست در هفته آینده: ❤️ شرکت در تمامی آزمونک ها و آزمون ها و دریافت کارنامه هوشمند، رایگان می باشد. 🗓 ۱۲ مهر: 📄 آزمونک مبحث شایع از درس نورولوژی 📚 مبحث: صرع و سایر اختلالات تشنجی + سردرد و افزایش فشار داخل جمجمه (ICP) 💎 پاسخنامه تشریحی: رایگان! 🔗 ورود به آزمونک 🗓 ۱۶ مهر: 📄 آزمون جامع بالین 📚 مبحث: نورولوژی و پاتولوژی 💎 پاسخنامه تشریحی: نیازمند اشتراک پرو 🔗 ورود به آزمون …
🔥7❤4
❤️ یه تست کشوری هم از مایندمپ امروز بزنیم👇 ✅ مشاهده تست 🗓 پره انترنی شهریور ۹۹ 📊 درصد پاسخدهی صحیح: ۸۹% Ⓜ️@Medofast | مدوفست
🔥7❤5
⚡️ مایندمپ مدوفستی عوارض کنتراست وریدی (با کیفیت تصویری بالاتر) مطابق با رادیولوژی پایه هرینگ 2024 👑 مشاهده ی همه مایندمپ های رادیولوژی #رادیولوژی Ⓜ️@Medofast | مدوفست
❤8🔥4
⚡️ مایندمپ مدوفستی عوارض کنتراست وریدی مطابق با رادیولوژی پایه هرینگ 2024 🔴 نسخه با کیفیت بالاتر در پیام پایین👇 👑 مشاهده ی همه مایندمپ های رادیولوژی #رادیولوژی Ⓜ️@Medofast | مدوفست
❤7🔥5
۴. مصرف کدامیک از موارد زیر در پیشگیری از عوارض کنترست وریدی در هاشم و قاسم مناسب است؟
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤9🔥4
۳. احتمال بروز واکنش به کنتراست وریدی در کدامیک از افراد زیر نسبت به سایرین کمتر است؟
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🔥9❤5
۲. مهشید پس از انجام CT-scan با کنتراست دچار واکنش شدید ایدیوسنکراتیک شده است. وجود کدامیک از علائم زیر در او محتمل نیست؟
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤11🔥6🥰1
۱. انجام CT-scan با کنتراست، در کدامیک از افراد زیر با بیماری کلیوی خطر کمتری دارد؟
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🔥6❤2😎1
👇نکات سوالات پایین برگرفته از سوالات کشوری و درون دانشگاهی سال های اخیر هستن. اول این سوالا رو جواب بده. ساعت ۱۹ امروز هم یه مایندمپ خیلی خوب داریم از مبحث عوارض کنتراست وریدی. بعد از خوندن این مایندمپ دیگه امکان نداره سوالی از این مبحث مطرح بشه و نتونی جواب بدی پس سوالات پایین رو با اپروچ رادیولوژی جواب بده❤️
❤11🔥3
👑 #شایع_ترین_مباحث درس #اطفال در آزمون دستیاری پزشکی: ✅ بیماری های عفونی ۵۶ سوال در ۱۵ دوره اخیر 📃 مشاهده سوالات ✅ طب جنین و نوزادان ۴۴ سوال در ۱۵ دوره اخیر 📃 مشاهده سوالات ✅ گوارش ۲۶ سوال در ۱۵ دوره اخیر 📃 مشاهده سوالات ✅ غدد درون ریز ۲۳ سوال در ۱۵ دوره اخیر 📃 مشاهده سوالات ✅ نفرولوژی و اورولوژی ۲۲ سوال در ۱۵ دوره اخیر 📃 مشاهده سوالات 🧾 مطالعه میکرودرسنامه های اطفال مدوفست 💊 مطالعه درسنامه جامع کپسول اطفال مد…
❤6🔥1
👑 #شایع_ترین_مباحث درس #اطفال در آزمون پره انترنی: ✅ بیماری های عفونی ۲۰۴ سوال در ۵۸ دوره اخیر 📃 مشاهده سوالات ✅ طب جنین و نوزادان ۱۶۲ سوال در ۵۸ دوره اخیر 📃 مشاهده سوالات ✅ گوارش ۱۰۹ سوال در ۵۸ دوره اخیر 📃 مشاهده سوالات ✅ نورولوژی ۸۴ سوال در ۵۸ دوره اخیر 📃 مشاهده سوالات ✅ غدد درون ریز ۷۵ سوال در ۵۸ دوره اخیر 📃 مشاهده سوالات 🧾 مطالعه میکرودرسنامه های اطفال مدوفست 💊 مطالعه درسنامه جامع کپسول اطفال مدوفست Ⓜ️@Me…
🔥6❤4
Showing the 12 most recent of 495 posts we hold for @medofast_balini. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@medofast_balini edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
The 6 most recent of 130 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
۴. مصرف کدامیک از موارد زیر در پیشگیری از عوارض کنترست وریدی در هاشم و قاسم مناسب است؟
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
۳. احتمال بروز واکنش به کنتراست وریدی در کدامیک از افراد زیر نسبت به سایرین کمتر است؟
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
۲. مهشید پس از انجام CT-scan با کنتراست دچار واکنش شدید ایدیوسنکراتیک شده است. وجود کدامیک از علائم زیر در او محتمل نیست؟
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
۱. انجام CT-scan با کنتراست، در کدامیک از افراد زیر با بیماری کلیوی خطر کمتری دارد؟
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
پاسخ تست بالا؟
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
۴. هماتوم سابدورال بروز یافته در کدامیک از افراد زیر پیشآگهی بدتری دارد؟
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 495 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 2 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 29 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 4 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 43 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“خلاصه های بالینی | مدوفست” (@medofast_balini), 35,224 subscribers as measured 30 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/medofast_balini.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.