Официальный канал БК «Марафон»
🎁 Бонус 25 000 ₽ новым клиентам: https://clck.ru/3U45iF
Пари на спорт по лучшим коэффициентам с 1997 г.
Канал в МАХ: https://max.ru/marathonbetru
Группа в ВК: https://vk.com/mbet_ru
Created
14 March 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
11 measurements spanning 10 days, net +98. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 20,537–20,713 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
16 Aug 2026, 06:26
20,678
-5
14 Aug 2026, 18:28
20,683
+47
13 Aug 2026, 12:07
20,636
+49
12 Aug 2026, 14:44
20,587
+30
11 Aug 2026, 11:52
20,557
-54
10 Aug 2026, 10:24
20,611
-48
9 Aug 2026, 11:52
20,659
-34
8 Aug 2026, 11:53
20,693
+56
7 Aug 2026, 11:28
20,637
+52
6 Aug 2026, 12:20
20,585
+5
6 Aug 2026, 11:01
20,580
first reading
Engagement
100 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 23 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
5.25%
avg views ÷ 20,678 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,080
100 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.82%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
100
of 100 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 16 August 2026
Posts held
100 (4 August 2026 – 16 August 2026)
Views total
108,484
Reactions total
1,972
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
16 Aug 2026, 07:57 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈13,000
Videos
≈2,100
Links
≈7,360
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 16 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
11m 43s
Average length
22s
Measured directly from 32 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,972 reactions across 100 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5235932387887583784
528
26.8%
custom 5235553726390902624
403
20.4%
custom 5235585526328759582
235
11.9%
custom 5235582137599563775
169
8.57%
custom 5238012165671133792
161
8.16%
custom 5235816879037128621
127
6.44%
🤯
120
6.09%
custom 5237877823389078981
75
3.80%
custom 5235771446873069393
62
3.14%
😭
36
1.83%
💯
25
1.27%
🤩
13
0.659%
👏
9
0.456%
🤔
5
0.254%
💔
4
0.203%
Custom emoji. 8 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 100 of the 100 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,972reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 100 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 16 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🏆 Суперкубки Англии и Франции, а ещё РПЛ и Испания!
📍 ТБ 2.5 сыграл в трёх из пяти последних очных матчей «Зенита» и «Динамо».
📍 «Ман Сити» обыгрывал «Арсенал» в двух минувших встречах.
📍 «Расинг» потерпел четыре поражения в пяти последних товарищеских матчах.
📍 «Спартак» уступил «Балтике» в трёх встречах кряду.
📍 ПСЖ забивал минимум два мяча «Лансу» в трёх последних матчах.
Ставь тут 👇🏻
💪 Махачев победил Гэрри и установил рекорд!
🔝 Ислам Махачев защитил титул на UFC 330, победив Иэна Гэрри решением судей.
👏 Теперь у россиянина 17 побед подряд — это новый рекорд UFC! Махачев обошёл легендарного Андерсона Силву, у которого было 16.
Остался в UFC соперник, способный остановить Ислама?
🔥 — конечно, есть
🏆 — нет, он суперчемпион!
💕 Бонус до 25 000 ₽ | МАХ
😍 «Родина» и «Акрон» подарили матч дня!
🔝 Сегодня в РПЛ по-настоящему феерили аутсайдеры — в Химках команды на двоих забили шесть мячей. Вот это заруба!
😴 ЦСКА и «Краснодар» с трудом забрали по три очка, хотя в прематче на их победы давали всего 1.53 и 1.57.
🙈 «Ростов» забил первым, но не смог удержать преимущество в матче с «Рубином».
Кто удивил сегодня больше всех?
⚡️ — «Родина» и «Акрон»
🔥 — ЦСКА забивает…
🥊 Махачев победит по очкам с кэфом 2.41?
Ислам идёт за 17-й победой подряд, но Гэрри умеет затягивать бои.
➕ П1 решением судей за 2.41: шесть последних боёв Гэрри прошли всю дистанцию, а единственный бой Махачева в полусреднем весе тоже завершился решением судей.
➕ ТБ 3.5 раунда за 2.34: такой исход сыграл в двух из трёх последних боёв Ислама, а Гэрри не завершал бой досрочно уже шесть встреч подряд.
Жми по сс…
🙈 «Милан» Аморима грохнул «Ман Юнайтед»!
⚽️⚽️ Красно-чёрные не впечатляли на предсезонке под руководством Рубена Аморима, но против бывшей команды португальца выдали топ-матч.
⚽️ «Милан» отгрузил «Юнайтед» четыре мяча (4:2), а решающий гол во втором тайме забил Гонсалу Рамуш.
Получится у Аморима в Италии лучше, чем в «МЮ»?
🤯 — и там провалится
❤️ — да, попадёт в тройку
💕 Бонус до 25 000 ₽ | МАХ
😱 И вот этот клуб играет в третьем дивизионе?!
🏴 В 2016-м «Лестер» сотворил одну из главных сенсаций в истории футбола и стал чемпионом Англии.
👀 А спустя десять лет клуб докатился до третьего дивизиона. И это ещё не всё: сейчас владельцы пытаются продать «Лестер» примерно за 200 млн €.
Сегодня в первом туре команда ещё и не смогла обыграть «Ноттс Каунти» (1:1)...
Вернутся когда-нибудь в АПЛ?
🤯 — когда-…
👀 Голов в матче «Севильи» не ждём? Кэф 1.65!
🇪🇸 Андалусийцы принимают «Райо Вальекано» в первом туре Ла Лиги.
➕ П1 за 2.35: «Севилья» выиграла три из четырёх последних матчей, а «Райо» уступил в четырёх из пяти минувших встреч. В очных матчах гости не побеждали четыре игры подряд.
➕ ТМ 2.5 за 1.65: такой исход сыграл в четырёх из пяти последних очных встреч.
Переходи по ссылке и ставь на испанский футбол.
Чт…
🙈 Когда после 3:3 у «Родины» и «Акрона» включил матч ЦСКА.
Там домашние нули против «Факела» после первого тайма.
Так и закончат?
😂 — ничья за 2.84
🔥 — ЦСКА дожмёт, 1.96
❤️ — Х2 за 1.89
▪️ Live ЦСКА vs Факел
🏆 Ферран Торрес в ПСЖ! Выиграет ЛЧ?
👀 У испанца за спиной уже есть всё: Ла Лига, Евро и победный гол в финале чемпионата мира. Не хватает одного — Лиги чемпионов.
🗼 Теперь Ферран — игрок ПСЖ. Парижане заплатили за форварда 50 млн €!
💣 Интересное совпадение: в 2023-м ПСЖ купил у «Барсы» Усмана Дембеле за те же 50 млн €. В итоге француз выиграл с парижанами ЛЧ, а затем забрал «Золотой мяч».
Кстати, победа ПСЖ в…
🔥 «Краснодар» продолжит побеждать?
«Быки» принимают «Ахмат» в четвёртом туре РПЛ.
➕ П1 за 1.58: «Краснодар» выиграл четыре последних матча, а дома победил в пяти последних официальных встречах.
➕ Обе забьют за 1.77: такой исход сыграл во всех матчах краснодарцев в этом сезоне, а также в трёх из пяти минувших очных встреч.
Жми по ссылке и делай ставку.
Что зайдёт?
⚡️ — П1 за 1.58
👍 — Обе забьют за 1.77
💕 Бон…
😱 Турция, ты что творишь?!
🇹🇷 Этот чемпионат навёл шороху этим летом. Зацени, какие громкие трансферы произошли за последние месяцы:
📍 В «Фенербахче» перебрались Мэйсон Гринвуд и Ромелу Лукаку,
📍 В «Трабзонспор» — Мохамед Салах,
📍 В «Бешикташ» — Душан Влахович!
Пора следить за турниром?
🔥 — посредственный турнир
⚡️ — вот теперь интересно!
💣 — откуда там столько денег?!
💕 Ставь на чемпионат Турции здесь
🏆 РПЛ и возвращение Ла Лиги!
📍 «Ростов» не проигрывал «Рубину» в пяти домашних матчах подряд: четыре победы и ничья.
📍 Ставка «Обе забьют: нет» сыграла в трёх из четырёх последних встреч «Алавеса» и «Хетафе».
📍 «Краснодар» выиграл все матчи нового сезона.
📍 ТМ 2.5 сыграл в четырёх последних встречах «Севильи» и «Райо Вальекано».
Ставь тут 👇🏻
Showing the 12 most recent of 100 posts we hold for @marathonbetru. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@marathonbetru edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
10 August 2026
Most recent edit
12 August 2026
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 136,098 of 1,481,346entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Лига Ставок @ligastavok · 152,379 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 13 August 2026
OLIMPBET @olimpbet · 116,976 Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 14 August 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cross-platform identity — Wikidata
A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Марафон на связи 🤙” (@marathonbetru), 20,678 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/marathonbetru.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.