Channel
@renrenchigua
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
68,197subscribers
-142 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001521754979 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @renrenchigua |
| Description | 吃瓜新闻曝光 热点资讯 沙雕视频 可爱动物 1228 0130 |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/renrenchigua |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 13:26 | 68,197 | -10 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 00:53 | 68,207 | -1 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 19:43 | 68,208 | -9 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 19:03 | 68,217 | -27 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 19:12 | 68,244 | -3 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 16:21 | 68,247 | -50 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 16:54 | 68,297 | -25 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:01 | 68,322 | -17 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 19:49 | 68,339 | first reading |
201 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 42 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 38 of 201 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 201 (6 August 2026 – 15 August 2026) |
| Views total | 111,400 |
| Reactions total | 37 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 15 Aug 2026, 17:45 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 172 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
37 reactions across 27 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 78.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 29 | 78.4% | |
| 👍 | 5 | 13.5% | |
| 👏 | 3 | 8.11% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 38 of the 201 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 37reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 201 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
| 次元色色◆A3◆精品互推车队 | ●COS美颜姬 #NSFW ~COSBIKA ●日更超社保R18动画同人资源 ●精神小妹纹身母狗 ●媚黑联盟|黑人BBC ●吃瓜群众🍉 ●黄文小说⭐恶堕女帝 ●[NSFW]SM交流资源🔞 ●快来吃瓜 ●窥视天下 ●TS奴隶俱乐部 💋SM调教 ●菊之爱|肛交 爆菊 屁眼 ●露出 淫妻 多人 调教 ------------------------ ❤点击参与互推 ------------------------ ●乱伦圈●低价翻墙●主奴群 ●TS妖妖🌟仙女棒
小伙同时找了几个大妈骗财骗色结果力不从心跑了也被大妈们抓住要交代
不遵守交通规则
就像电影《人类清除计划》里那样，人们在家里设置了防御工事。
手机成瘾几乎在几秒钟内夺走了她的生命。
岳华峰，原西安政协主席，从他家中搜到的现金，达4亿元……
8月13日13时，福建福安市甘棠镇华海船厂一船舶发生火灾。消防救援人员到场处置过程中，现场突发爆炸，造成1名消防员失联。
网友指出日本驾驶礼让行人是其日常生活常态，并非表现“离谱”，而是以此反衬中国在交通文明方面的不足。
【令人难过的消息】争夺战简直太残酷了😨😨😨
这台1939年德国制造的车床，至今已近90年，仍在生产精密齿轮。 德国老式工程技术真是技艺超群。
8月13日晚，河南周口市一處河岸決堤，缺口宽約30米，洪水倒灌入市區，有學校被淹。
云南一女子，在丈夫突然因病残疾后，为承担全部家庭开支，自学舞蹈和剪辑，立志当舞蹈网红，在发了100多条默默无闻的视频之后，终于走红，目前已有近6万粉丝，收入也能cover丈夫治病和生活费。
👍5
Showing the 12 most recent of 201 posts we hold for @renrenchigua. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,255,643 of 1,480,944entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“快来吃瓜” (@renrenchigua), 68,197 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/renrenchigua.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.