Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 历史老照片(中文)Timeless Archives

Channel

历史老照片(中文)Timeless Archives

@Discoveryzhongwen

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

42,231subscribers

+1,040 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001829234342
TypeChannel
Username@Discoveryzhongwen
Description歡迎投稿這裡👉 @Discoveryzhongwen_bot 歷史是人類經驗的寶庫,它可以為我們提供有關人類社會、文化、政治、經濟、科技等各個領域的豐富知識。通過學習歷史,我們可以了解到過去的成就、錯誤和挑戰,從而更好地理解現在的世界和未來的走向。同時,歷史可以培養我們的思辨能力、分析能力和判斷能力,幫助我們更好地理解和應對當下的複雜社會問題。因此,學習歷史不僅可以拓寬我們的知識視野,還可以幫助我們成為更好的決策者和更有思想深度的人。
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held34
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Discoveryzhongwen

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 53% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

41,19142,23141,7117 August 2026 — 41,191 subscribers7 August 2026 — 41,191 subscribers7 August 2026 — 41,193 subscribers8 August 2026 — 41,218 subscribers9 August 2026 — 41,239 subscribers10 August 2026 — 41,256 subscribers11 August 2026 — 41,280 subscribers12 August 2026 — 41,296 subscribers14 August 2026 — 41,326 subscribers15 August 2026 — 41,369 subscribers17 August 2026 — 41,420 subscribers18 August 2026 — 41,436 subscribers19 August 2026 — 41,469 subscribers20 August 2026 — 41,492 subscribers21 August 2026 — 41,519 subscribers22 August 2026 — 41,544 subscribers24 August 2026 — 41,591 subscribers25 August 2026 — 41,615 subscribers26 August 2026 — 41,642 subscribers27 August 2026 — 41,663 subscribers28 August 2026 — 41,699 subscribers29 August 2026 — 41,723 subscribers30 August 2026 — 41,744 subscribers31 August 2026 — 41,777 subscribers1 September 2026 — 41,806 subscribers2 September 2026 — 41,820 subscribers3 September 2026 — 41,883 subscribers5 September 2026 — 41,919 subscribers8 September 2026 — 41,984 subscribers11 September 2026 — 42,019 subscribers13 September 2026 — 42,044 subscribers14 September 2026 — 42,103 subscribers16 September 2026 — 42,178 subscribers19 September 2026 — 42,231 subscribers7 August 202619 September 2026
34 measurements spanning 43 days, net +1,040. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 41,035–42,387 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 01:5842,231+53
16 Sept 2026, 19:1642,178+75
14 Sept 2026, 19:3742,103+59
13 Sept 2026, 09:2242,044+25
11 Sept 2026, 09:3842,019+35
8 Sept 2026, 16:1641,984+65
5 Sept 2026, 06:5641,919+36
3 Sept 2026, 09:5641,883+63
2 Sept 2026, 05:1241,820+14
1 Sept 2026, 04:0241,806+29
31 Aug 2026, 00:1641,777+33
30 Aug 2026, 01:0441,744+21
29 Aug 2026, 02:5741,723+24
28 Aug 2026, 04:2541,699+36
27 Aug 2026, 05:3741,663+21
26 Aug 2026, 04:4441,642+27
25 Aug 2026, 05:2441,615+24
24 Aug 2026, 06:4241,591+47
22 Aug 2026, 16:5441,544+25
21 Aug 2026, 05:2741,519first reading

Engagement

105 posts held, back to 26 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 88 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
8.44%
avg views ÷ 42,231 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,570
59 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.12%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
59
of 105 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 September 2026
Posts held105 (26 July 202623 September 2026)
Views total210,355
Reactions total2,355
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken23 Sept 2026, 01:31 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
8,220
Videos
24
Links
439

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 23 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

4,048 reactions across 105 posts, in 48 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍83120.5%
💩71617.7%
46511.5%
🕊3608.89%
🌭2947.26%
🫡2586.37%
🤡1202.96%
👏1192.94%
🤮902.22%
🖕862.12%
🥰852.10%
🔥842.08%
👎812.00%
😁771.90%
🤣521.28%
🍌330.815%
310.766%
😎270.667%
🗿250.618%
💯160.395%
28 further kinds1984.89%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 105 of the 105 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,048 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 105 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 23 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

23 Sept 2026, 00:42 UTC124 views9 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Photo

#匿名投稿 在1970~1978年由深田打捞公司打捞上来的旧日本海军主力舰长门级陆奥号战列舰的410㎜双联装主炮塔(图片拍摄时间大概为1970年7月~8月)

🫡4💩21👍1🗿1

22 Sept 2026, 16:40 UTC610 views9 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Photo

玛丽莲·梦露在《绅士更喜欢金发女郎》(1953年)的片場。

🔥5🌭31

22 Sept 2026, 15:34 UTC751 views37 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Photo

#宣传 《关于正确处理人民内部矛盾问题》(葡萄牙语版) 毛泽东 人民版丛书第5册 1974年 《关于正确处理人民内部矛盾的问题》是毛泽东于1957年提出的重要政治理论,核心思想是区分“敌我矛盾”和“人民内部矛盾”,并强调用不同方式解决:敌我矛盾需斗争,人民内部矛盾则应通过民主、说服和教育来解决。 核心内容简述 • 两类矛盾• 敌我矛盾:人民与敌人之间的矛盾,性质是对抗性的,需要通过斗争解决。 • 人民内部矛盾:人民之间的分歧,如工人与农民、知识分子与工农、政府与群众之间的矛盾,性质是非对抗性的,应通过民主和协商解决。 Marxists Int... • 解决方式• 敌我矛盾:采取专政、斗争手段。 • 人民内部矛盾:采取民主、批评与自我批评、教育、团结的方法。 Wikipedia • 历史背景• 1957年正值中国社会主义建设初期,毛泽东在“百花齐放、百家争鸣”与“反右运动”之间提出这一理论,既鼓励思想开放,又强调政

👍20💩13🤣3🔥1

22 Sept 2026, 14:44 UTC≈1,010 views42 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Photo

#匿名投稿 1942年3月30日。汪精卫身穿海军礼服,在扬子江进行海军阅兵

💩31🫡8🔥1🖕1🥰1

21 Sept 2026, 12:05 UTC≈1,900 views124 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Photo

抗日戰爭期間的中國八路軍號手,1942

👍53🫡49💩15🤮31🖕1🤡1😁1

20 Sept 2026, 15:35 UTC≈2,240 views21 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Photo

1982年,艺术家阿格尼丝·德内斯(Agnes Denes)在曼哈顿下城巴特里公园附近一片刚填海造出的空地上(正对世贸中心,紧邻华尔街金融区),历时数月耕种出一片两英亩的金黄麦田,题为《麦田——对抗》(Wheatfield — A Confrontation)。这块土地当时估值高达数亿美元,本预计用于房地产开发,德内斯却选择在寸土寸金的曼哈顿种下小麦,收获后将麦粒分送到世界各地的展览与机构。这件作品被视为大地艺术(Land Art)与生态艺术的代表作之一,尖锐地对比了商业开发、资本价值与粮食、土地、可持续性之间的矛盾。

👍116🤡2👎1🫡1

19 Sept 2026, 16:41 UTC≈2,660 views18 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Photo

#名人 1956年,奥黛丽·赫本在墨西哥用餐。

8🌭7👎2🔥1

19 Sept 2026, 13:05 UTC≈2,670 views12 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Photo

中国驻柏林大使陈介,于1941年12月8日向德国递交了中国的宣战书。 珍珠港事件爆发后,中国于1941年12月9日正式对日、德、意宣战(此前虽已抗战多年,但未正式宣战)。陈介作为驻德大使,负责在柏林递交对德宣战文书,象征中国正式加入同盟国阵营对抗轴心国。

6🕊4🤔2

19 Sept 2026, 11:31 UTC≈2,680 views82 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Photo

尼基塔·赫魯曉夫、毛澤東和胡志明在北京參加慶祝中華人民共和國成立十週年的宴會,1959

👍42🤮23💩9🖕43🔥1

18 Sept 2026, 15:30 UTC≈2,910 views35 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Photo

1979年伊朗伊斯兰革命推翻巴列维王朝后,霍梅尼政权迅速推行伊斯兰化政策,同年3月宣布女性在公共场所须戴头巾(hijab),引发数万名妇女(包括许多曾支持革命的世俗派、左翼女性)走上德黑兰街头抗议,喊出”自由不是东方也不是西方”等口号,这是伊朗革命后最早、规模最大的公民抗议之一。尽管抗议持续多日,强制戴头巾的规定最终仍在此后几年逐步以法律形式确立,成为伊朗政教合一体制的标志性政策之一,直至今日仍是伊朗社会争议与抗争的核心议题(如2022年”玛莎·阿米尼”抗议浪潮)。

🫡20🤡104🔥1

17 Sept 2026, 14:50 UTC≈3,130 views16 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Photo

1993年,波斯尼亚维泰兹——英国歌手萨曼莎·福克斯到访英国联合国维和部队(UNPROFOR)驻地。 1993年,波斯尼亚战争期间,英国歌手萨曼莎·福克斯前往波斯尼亚慰问驻当地的英国联合国维和部队,为士兵演出并鼓舞士气。

🌭103👍1💩1🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 105 posts we hold for @Discoveryzhongwen. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

中国悲剧档案官方频道
@newszg_official · 162,958
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 12 August 2026
轻口味时间
@lightrekt · 49,340
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 35 here — alongside 34 others — read 25 August 2026
敏感经济信息分享
@pelosi3 · 70,867
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 20 August 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“历史老照片(中文)Timeless Archives” (@Discoveryzhongwen), 42,231 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Discoveryzhongwen.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.