Channel
@DismantlingDaCabal2
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
619subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002298536355 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @DismantlingDaCabal2 |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/DismantlingDaCabal2 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 21:00 | 619 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:46 | 619 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (6 August 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 70 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 22:46 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 6 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
: 🏃𝐓𝐫𝐮𝐦𝐩 𝐒𝐭𝐨𝐩𝐬 𝐓𝐨𝐝𝐝𝐥𝐞𝐫 𝐅𝐫𝐨𝐦 𝐑𝐮𝐧𝐧𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐎𝐟𝐟 𝐒𝐭𝐚𝐠𝐞 President Donald Trump jogged across the stage to stop a toddler from wandering off the edge during an event in Las Vegas on Tuesday. Read more👇 https://theepochtim.es/itgnei
Photo, posted without a caption
🇺🇸 This happened in #Memphis on Sunday… he survived a switch from point blank range. The 19 year old shooter has been arrested. Investigators say Ambrose Ramsey was targeting an adult he knew when he allegedly fired multiple rounds inside the crowded store, striking a boy in the leg and grazing the intended victim. He is being held on a $250,000 bond and is scheduled to appear in court Thursday. Follow us -> LiveL…
🇺🇸 #SanFrancisco. Altercation on 24th & Mission after a woman allegedly used racial slurs and tried to steal a man’s scooter, according to the witness. What do mean get off of her? She the aggressor... It is clear that he did not start a conflict with her and did not even want to hit her. Follow us -> LiveLeak
🇺🇸 ICE agents in #Chicago confronted two men who were following them and recording them. Thoughts? Follow us -> LiveLeak
"Unaccompanied minors" now being transferred from Ceuta to the Spanish mainland. All aided and abetted. All clearly men. Dirty Sánchez must go! THERE IS NOT, NOR HAS THERE EVER BEEN A VOTING SOLUTION. ALL ELECTIONS ARE RIGGED. POLITICAL LEADERS ARE NOT VOTED IN. THEY ARE HAND SELECTED BY SATAN AND HIS PUPPETS THE J👹ws ‼️‼️ 👹👹👹🤬🤬🤬🤬 🔥🔥🔥 Join @GodlyEndTimeTruthChat @GodlyEndTimeTruth @TraditionalBritainGroup
BREAKING: In a huge win, Connecticut Children's Hospital is TERMINATING transgender surgery for children, caving to Trump's DOJ and HHS "The hospital will ALSO put $500K toward medical care for patients who suffered harmful consequences. It is the 3RD HOSPITAL to reach a deal with the Trump admin." 🇺🇸Join👉 @SGTnewsNetwork 📎 X (Twitter)▪️Truth Social
Video, posted without a caption
Yup… it was AI. NASA = DECEPTION The world is waking up.
Popular conspiracy theorist and rare and mystical book collector Joe Feltz has died of unknown causes. He was specifically not suicidal. (2 min 13 sec) Join @davidavocadowolfe 🥑 Wow, check this out about Joe Feltz. I am sure some of you have watched his videos about ancient Bibles, Masonic writings, missing history, and free energy. He apparently died 2 days ago and has gone viral that he has been taken out, but al…
BREAKING: BLM activist group in Wisconsin just bailed dozens of criminals out of jail Who’s funding this??? https://x.com/libsoftiktok/status/2085441474993197129/video/1 Follow Libs of TikTok Fans: t.me/libsontiktok 🔥🔥🔥 Join @GodlyEndTimeTruthChat @GodlyEndTimeTruth Y’ALL KNOW WHO’S FUNDING THIS 🙄 IT’S ALWAYS THE J👹ws
The battle for who can suck up to Israel the most sure is creepy. None of them are genuine, they’re just grovelling cultists who know how to garner success.
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @DismantlingDaCabal2. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 955,290 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@DismantlingDaCabal2 named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“DismantlingDaCabal2” (@DismantlingDaCabal2), 619 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DismantlingDaCabal2.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.