Federal judge dismisses charges against Oath Keepers members involved in Jan. 6 Capitol protest Article Link A federal judge has granted a request from the Department of Justice (DOJ) to drop criminal charges against eight members of a right-wing anti-government group, the Oath Keepers, who were charged with seditious conspiracy after the January 6, 2021, protest at the U.S. Capitol.

Channel
Jan 6th TRUTH Archive
@jan6trutharchive
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
103subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001883775649 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @jan6trutharchive |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/jan6trutharchive |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 09:45 | 103 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:13 | 103 | first reading |
Engagement
17 posts held, back to 17 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 6.80%
- avg views ÷ 103 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 7.0
- 1 post measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 1
- of 17 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 17 (17 May 2026 – 5 August 2026) |
| Views total | 7 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Aug 2026, 09:45 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 918
- Videos
- 761
- Links
- 919
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 2h 38m
- Average length
- 26m 24s
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
2 reactions across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 2 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 17 May 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
I ask that everyone please show Brian Cole Jr. and his family your support by following and sharing their page - @FreeBrianCole - here on X. This is a two front war to bring him home: the DC District Court and the American Court of Public Opinion. https://x.com/SteveBakerUSA/status/2075983464520695890 🎱@MagicEightBallRedux
Ivan Raiklin @IvanRaiklin To: @DAGToddBlanche @USAttyPirro CC:@SpeakerJohnson @Jim_Jordan @RepLoudermilk Acknowledge receipt! 👇👇👇 Former D.C. Metropolitan Police officer Michael Fanone has been criminally referred to the DOJ by @IvanRaiklin (Ivan Raiklin) over allegations tied to his January 6 testimony, public statements, and conduct during a House Judiciary Committee hearing. To be clear: a criminal referral…
❤2
@IvanRaiklin Please DM me any and all video you can find for the following: MPD Officers: Michael Fanone, Jimmy Albright, Lila Morris, Jason Bagshaw, Daniel Hodges USCP Officers: Harry Dunn, David Lazarus, Aquinilo Gonnell, Michael Byrd 👇 @JudicialWatch announced today that the Washington, DC, Metropolitan Police Department released over 1,000 hours of body-worn camera footage in 1,630 videos from the January 6,…
NEW: BREAKING: Over 1000 More Hours of J6 Body Cam Footage Have Been Released. https://thenationalpulse.com/2026/07/06/breaking-over-1000-more-hours-of-j6-body-cam-footage-have-been-released/?feed_id=96906&_unique_id=6a4baa02769ca
💥💥💥 J6 Police officer, Michael Fanone has been criminally referred on seven counts. @IvanRaiklin gives @gatewaypundit the scoop on Fanone’s referral ..... 🚨🚨🚨🚨 Secretary of Retribution Drafts Criminal Referrals for Michael Fanone CRIMINAL REFERRAL Potential Violations of 18 U.S.C. § 1001, 18 U.S.C. § 111, 40 U.S.C. § 5104 (three counts), and 18 U.S.C. § 1512(c)(2) (two counts) by Former Metropolitan Police Depar…
Thomas Massie @RepThomasMassie How did the officers know on January 6th to look exclusively in the only two places where the alleged pipe bomber dwelled on January 5th? At least one of them was part of the plot. Release Brian Cole, Jr. 👇👇👇 Investigative journalist Steve Baker says the January 6 pipe bomber sat down in exactly two places the night before the devices were found. When officers were sent out to sea…
Not a single DC judge faced consequences for unlawfully imprisoning 300+ January 6ers using a corporate fraud statute. The Supreme Court overturned it. The judges shrugged and kept their seats. These judges weren't installed to protect the people. They were installed to protect the criminal syndicate. That ends when we win the midterms.
Tucker Carlson: Did you hear the Feds finally arrested someone in the January 6 pipe bombing case? If you think the case has been solved, listen to this. @police_frequency
Feds placed the pipe bombs and fomented the demonstrations on January 6, 2021. One day this will be known as certainly as the fact that COVID was the result of U.S. funded lab research. https://x.com/RepThomasMassie/status/2069472567115513890 🎱 @MagicEightBallReduxF
😅 ‼️‼️‼️ Sean Penn, coming off his third Oscar win for One Battle After Another, has been quietly setting up a passion project. And it’s a doozy. The currently untitled film will follow the early life of a cop who goes on to be caught up in the January 6th Capitol riots. Penn has scripted and will direct the movie, which has five-time Oscar nominated actor Bradley Cooper in talks to star in the lead role. There’…
🇺🇸 Pro-Trump activist Jon Mellis, a pardoned January 6 defendant, was surrounded by far-left protesters outside the Edward R. Roybal Federal Building in Los Angeles. Video footage shows the crowd dousing him with a liquid widely reported to be gasoline before chasing him as he fled the scene. Mellis was briefly detained by LAPD officers and later released without charges. Follow us -> LiveLeak
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @jan6trutharchive. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@IvanRaiklin · 20,2113 postsJim Jordan
@jim_jordan · 3011 postJudicial Watch
@JudicialWatch · 7,7871 postLiveLeak
@leaklive · 143,6971 postPolice frequency
@police_frequency · 71,1591 postThomas Massie
@RepThomasMassie · 2,8221 postSenator Rand Paul
@senrandpaul · 501 postSpeaker Mike Johnson
@SpeakerJohnson · 2641 postSteve Baker
@SteveBakerUSA · 111 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 4
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 4
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@jan6trutharchive named 4 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 5 posts, 10 August 2026 – 10 August 2026
named in 1 post, 10 August 2026 – 10 August 2026
named in 1 post, 10 August 2026 – 10 August 2026
named in 1 post, 10 August 2026 – 10 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Jan 6th TRUTH Archive” (@jan6trutharchive), 103 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/jan6trutharchive.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.