Engagement
20 posts held, back to 22 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 50.9%
- avg views ÷ 359 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 183
- 20 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 10.4%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 20
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
379 reactions across 20 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.3% of them.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 379reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
6 Aug 2026, 15:56 UTC48 views16 reactionsread 6 August 2026 کوچهدریا
کوچه، عمرِ خودش را کرده بود. چشمهاش از سالها پیش نمیدید. خبر را هم مرغدریایی بیخ گوشش فریاد کرد تا شنید. قلبش روشن شد از این نوید.
امشب دریا میآمد، میبردش و او به آرزوی دیرینهاش میرسید.
لادن شایانفر
#داستانک
@ladanshayanfar
❤12❤🔥2😍2
5 Aug 2026, 20:21 UTC90 views25 reactionsread 6 August 2026 پرچانههای لالند
چشمانم
وقتی که میخندی
لادن شایانفر
#شعر
@ladanshayanfar
❤15😍4❤🔥2👍2😐2
4 Aug 2026, 19:21 UTC92 views19 reactionsread 6 August 2026 بیرگِ غیور است شعرم
بیاعتنا
نگهبان ذوقم
لادن شایانفر
#شعر
@ladanshayanfar
❤16😐2😍1
3 Aug 2026, 21:16 UTC105 views18 reactionsread 6 August 2026 نیک از ابر و عطرِ لیمو
۱ـ امروز صبح آسمان ابری بود. از لای ابرها، آبیاش را یواشکی جایزه میداد به تماشاچیها. خورشید هم پخش و پلا نبود. چهارزانو نشسته بود و دامن انوارش را مرتب دور و برش گسترده بود.
اینقدر که چشمنواز بود، در راه اداره نگهداشتم و عکس گرفتم ازش. وقتی رسیدم، گرو گرفتم از هوای ابری و توی محوطه قدم زدم، هزار تا. آفتاب که نه، شرجی هم نبود و اذیت نشدم. چندتایی هم عکس گرفتم. هم از آسمان و هم از گربهی…
❤9😍8🤔1
2 Aug 2026, 17:50 UTC154 views19 reactionsread 6 August 2026 زمانچین
🌀نمیدانم زمان شیرینسخن است یا ترشرو؟
فقط میدانم همیشه شورش را درمیآورد.
🌀زبانِ زمان، همیشه دراز است.
🌀 روزی هم ما محاکمه میشویم به خاطر تمام کاسهکوزههایی که سر زمان شکستهایم؟
زمانِ سرشکسته آهش گیراست؟
🌀زماندزدی هم جرم است؟ چند سال حبس دارد؟
🌀هنر زمان، خاطره پسانداختن است.
🌀اکنون، تاجِ سرِ زمان است.
🌀دست زمان و مرگ توی یک کاسهست.
🌀وقتی منتظریم، زمان شوخیاش گل میکند. و وقتی شتابانیم، طاقچ…
❤14😍2😐2🤔1
1 Aug 2026, 20:08 UTC158 views26 reactionsread 6 August 2026 در مثلث عشقی مو، شانه، سشوار،
همیشه کون سشوار میسوزد.
لادن شایانفر
#کاریکلماتور
@ladanshayanfar
😁20❤5😍1
31 Jul 2026, 21:57 UTC195 views21 reactionsread 6 August 2026 صبح به محض بیداری چند صفحه کتاب «پرسیدن مهمتر از پاسخدادن است» خواندم. فصلهای اول (کجا؟ کی؟ کی؟ اختیار) بد نبود. ولی توی فصل معرفت گیر افتادم. هفتهی گذشته از چرایی کم کتاب خواندنم پرسیدم از خودم توی آزادنویسی. دریافتم که چون حوزهی مطالعاتی امسالم برایم ناآشناست و خیلی ملموس و قابل درک نیست، ازش فاصله میگیرم. انگاری میبینم به اندازهی وقتی که میگذارم، چیزی عایدم نمیشود. کتابهایی با موضوع پرسشگری، تفکر، معرفت…
❤18👍1💘1😍1
30 Jul 2026, 20:36 UTC193 views13 reactionsread 6 August 2026 انگشت ششم
من یک انگشت ششم دارم. من هم مثل حسن* دوست ندارم انگشت ششمم را به کسی نشان بدهم. حتا آشناها. فهمیدهام آشناها هم غریبهاند. چند باری نشان دادم و غلط کردم نشان دادم. همانوقتهایی که نتوانستم طاقت بیاورم٬ بعد پشیمان شدم مثل چی. پشیمان شدم، چون هیچکس نمیفهمید. آنجور که باید نمیفهمید. یا تعجب میکرد، یا دلسوزی. یا زیادی حرف میزد یا ناروا. و زورم میگرفت و پشیمان میشدم مثل چی. از اول نمیدانستم که نباید به …
❤12💘1
29 Jul 2026, 21:52 UTC176 views24 reactionsread 6 August 2026 خاطره، بستنیست
توی جنگ آفتاب
پای من حساب میشود
ولی
سهم جوی آب میشود
لادن شایانفر
#شعر
@ladanshayanfar
❤🔥13❤7🤔2😍2
28 Jul 2026, 16:15 UTC275 views32 reactionsread 6 August 2026 دلتنگی
خیسیِ ممتدِ لپم
از تَربوسهی ننهست
پاکش نمیکنم
لادن شایانفر
#شعر
@ladanshayanfar
❤21❤🔥5😁5😍1
27 Jul 2026, 19:30 UTC242 views18 reactionsread 6 August 2026 زنجره
چرا جیرجیر حسرت
توی چرک گوش زندگی
گم نمیشود؟
لادن شایانفر
#شعر
@ladanshayanfar
❤12❤🔥3👍2💘1
26 Jul 2026, 21:31 UTC274 views18 reactionsread 6 August 2026 آتشپاره
این بچه ذاتن عاشق است. عاشقپیشگیاش زبانزد خاص و عام است. ولی سر معشوقههایش را از دم بر باد میدهد. باوجودی که ازدواج او را فقط با همجنسش مجاز دانستهاند(برای همه، از قدیم و ندیم تا بوده مگر همین نبوده؟) ولی مگر این حرفها تو کَت آتش میرود؟ کلهشقتر از اینهاست.
اصلن آتش، همیشه نوجوان و خام است. واسه همین اینقدر تیزوبز است. مگر که خواب عاقلی و پختگی ببیند. گرچه، هیچوقت خواب نمیبیند. خواب بر او حرا…
👍9😍4🤔3❤🔥2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ladanshayanfar. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 21,070 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 21 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“گَپ| لادن شایانفر” (@ladanshayanfar), 359 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ladanshayanfar.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.