Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Kuch New For You

@kuchnewforyou

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

25,963subscribers

-2,318 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001328414652
TypeChannel
Username@kuchnewforyou
DescriptionHey Guys, Kaise hain aap sab Any Question👇 @rahul15515 Youtube Channel - https://youtube.com/@KuchNewForYou
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/kuchnewforyou

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@kuchnewforyou/70830 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 19:40 UTC@oyeeerahul1/496096 Aug 2026, 19:40 UTC1.00under a minute
@kuchnewforyou/70832 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 19:41 UTC@oyeeerahul1/496116 Aug 2026, 19:41 UTC1.00under a minute
@kuchnewforyou/70993 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 17:57 UTC@oyeeerahul1/497287 Aug 2026, 17:57 UTC1.00under a minute
@kuchnewforyou/70996 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 17:59 UTC@oyeeerahul1/497317 Aug 2026, 18:00 UTC1.00under a minute
@kuchnewforyou/71000 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 18:04 UTC@oyeeerahul1/497357 Aug 2026, 18:05 UTC1.00under a minute
@kuchnewforyou/71005 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 18:10 UTC@oyeeerahul1/497407 Aug 2026, 18:11 UTC1.00under a minute
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@oyeeerahul115 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minutethis entry (150)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 16 comparable posts for this entry, running 6 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @kuchnewforyou — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

25,96328,28127,1227 August 2026 — 28,281 subscribers7 August 2026 — 28,281 subscribers7 August 2026 — 28,001 subscribers8 August 2026 — 27,537 subscribers9 August 2026 — 27,264 subscribers10 August 2026 — 26,831 subscribers11 August 2026 — 26,236 subscribers12 August 2026 — 25,963 subscribers7 August 202612 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 6 days, net -2,318. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 25,615–28,629 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 21:1825,963-273
11 Aug 2026, 18:0226,236-595
10 Aug 2026, 20:1126,831-433
9 Aug 2026, 19:3227,264-273
8 Aug 2026, 18:5727,537-464
7 Aug 2026, 20:0528,001-280
7 Aug 2026, 02:1528,281no change
7 Aug 2026, 02:0828,281first reading

Engagement

169 posts held, back to 6 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
1.66%
avg views ÷ 25,963 subscribers
Avg views / post
431
169 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.903%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
169
of 169 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held169 (6 August 202612 August 2026)
Views total72,843
Reactions total658
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 22:19 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
37,400
Videos
4,110
Links
12,400

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
10m 21s
Average length
2m 04s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

658 reactions across 169 posts, in 23 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
19629.8%
🔥16725.4%
🥰10415.8%
🤩6710.2%
👌294.41%
👏213.19%
😍142.13%
🫡142.13%
👍111.67%
🍌71.06%
💋60.912%
😁50.76%
30.456%
💯30.456%
💩20.304%
🙏20.304%
👎10.152%
🖕10.152%
😇10.152%
😘10.152%
3 further kinds30.456%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 169 of the 169 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 658reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 169 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 18:42 UTC250 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🇷🇺BREAKING: Russia's central bank names the ONLY three cryptos its public can trade: BTC, ETH and USDT. The directive implements the crypto law Putin signed this month, effective September 1.

3🥰2🔥1

12 Aug 2026, 18:42 UTC247 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

⚡️UPDATE: BTCPay Server is offering a bounty of up to 3 BTC to recover funds stolen in its Lightning wallet exploit. The reward is 10% of any recovered funds, worth around $190,000, extended to anyone with information, including the attacker.

2🔥1🥰1

12 Aug 2026, 18:37 UTC223 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🚨SHOCKING: OpenAI's former operating chief Brad Lightcap quits after 8 years, the 8th senior exit before its IPO. Lightcap announced he is leaving to start a new venture, after building OpenAI's finance, legal and partnership teams since 2018. "It is just not that typical to have so many executives depart before their long awaited IPO. Unless…" says Jeff Park of crypto investment firm ParaFi.

1🔥1🥰1

12 Aug 2026, 18:34 UTC202 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🚨HUGE: The AI money supercycle is here, with analysts expecting Big Tech to spend over $1 TRILLION next year. Just this week: - Nvidia signs a $500 BILLION AI financing push with Wall Street's biggest firms - Intel's $20 billion stock sale draws over $100 BILLION in demand - CoreWeave doubles revenue and reveals a $104 BILLION backlog - Anthropic targets an IPO at a $965 BILLION valuation within months - Korea'

2🔥1🥰1

12 Aug 2026, 18:33 UTC190 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🚨 BREAKING: Harmony hit by a MASSIVE 4 BILLION $ONE exploit, token crashes -30%. The unauthorized mint was equal to roughly 26% of the total supply, with the attacker already moving 2.8B ONE to exchanges, per Juiceberg. Only 115M ONE remains onchain, while the overwhelming majority has already been sold or is sitting in exchange wallets, potentially ready for further selling. Harmony has confirmed the exploit and

🥰21🔥1

12 Aug 2026, 18:28 UTC209 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🚨BREAKING: Phoebe Gates’ shopping app accused of falsely taking credit for sales it didn’t drive. Internal messages reportedly show Phia co-founders Phoebe Gates and Sophia Kianni knew for at least 7 months that its browser extension could claim commissions for sales where the product was never used. Yet the company claims it only discovered the issue “within the last 24 hours.” It has since suspended monetization

1🔥1🤩1

12 Aug 2026, 18:23 UTC228 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

₹10 , ₹20 Plastic Notes Coming..

1🔥1🥰1

12 Aug 2026, 18:20 UTC240 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

LATEST: ZachXBT refuses to track Harmony’s 4B $ONE exploit and urges others NOT to help for free. The onchain investigator says Harmony "took advantage" of people who helped freeze funds from its $100M DPRK hack in 2022, rewarding them with $0 and only a “good job.” The criticism follows Harmony's request from exchanges to freeze 4 wallets tied to the exploit.

1🔥1🥰1

12 Aug 2026, 18:15 UTC247 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026

₹310 लाख करोड़ 🔥

1🔥1🥰1

12 Aug 2026, 18:14 UTC261 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Gold and silver add $3.1 TRILLION in combined value in 7 trading days.

1🔥1🥰1

12 Aug 2026, 18:13 UTC238 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

$7.8T asset manager Fidelity files to add staking to its spot $ETH ETF. Fidelity Ethereum Fund (FETH) could stake up to 100% of its 480k+ ETH, worth roughly $880M. The fund would retain 85% of staking rewards and pay investors in cash every quarter.

1🔥1🥰1

Showing the 12 most recent of 169 posts we hold for @kuchnewforyou. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

The Mukul Agrawal
@themukulagrawal · 183,268
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 12 August 2026
Neeraj Joshi
@Neerajjoshi5014 · 201,079
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 11 August 2026
SMC KAPIL DEV
@smc_Kapil_Dev · 447,317
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 10 August 2026
Pushkar Raj Thakur Official
@PushkarRajThakurOfficial · 213,401
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 11 August 2026
CoinDCX Announcements
@CoinDCX_Announcements · 187,554
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 11 August 2026
Crypto Pumps
@Crypto_Pump_Signal_Binance · 920,354
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 11 August 2026

This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Kuch New For You” (@kuchnewforyou), 25,963 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kuchnewforyou.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.