Channel
@kashinasot
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
5,572subscribers
-14 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001753874312 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @kashinasot |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/kashinasot |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 17:53 | 5,572 | -8 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 01:15 | 5,580 | -5 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:28 | 5,585 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 05:52 | 5,586 | first reading |
25 posts held, back to 14 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 15 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 25 (14 July 2026 – 11 August 2026) |
| Views total | 8,560 |
| Reactions total | 85 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 04:06 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
85 reactions across 15 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 49 | 57.6% | |
| 👍 | 22 | 25.9% | |
| 🔥 | 6 | 7.06% | |
| 👏 | 4 | 4.71% | |
| 👎 | 2 | 2.35% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 1.18% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 1.18% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 25 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 99reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @kashinasot. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 25 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 14 July 2026 to 11 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Показываю, что я называю интерактивным чек-листом👆 Я хотела сделать не просто очередной файл, а рабочий инструмент, которым действительно удобно пользоваться при аудите процесса обучения. В видео показываю, как использовать такой чек-лист. ❗️ И, кстати, создавать такие чек-листы можно по каждому процессу по охране труда. В нём можно: ✔️ указать данные компании; ✔️ выбрать особенности организации, чтобы в проверку…
❤4🔥2
💰 Какой тариф мастер-класса выбрать? На мастер-класс «Аудит процесса обучения по охране труда» я сделала два тарифа - в зависимости от того, хотите вы просто пройти мастер-класс или еще получить дополнительные инструменты для работы. 1️⃣ Тариф «Базовый» Подойдёт тем, кому важно получить полный разбор темы и разобраться в изменениях Постановления №2464. В тариф входят: ✔️ участие в прямом эфире; ✔️ разбор всех изм…
🔥 ПРОДАЖИ МАСТЕР-КЛАССА ОТКРЫТЫ 🔥 Если после изменений в Постановление №2464 ваша первая мысль была, что надо обновлять документы, то я бы на этом месте остановилась. Потому что документы - это только часть процесса. Можно переписать положение. Можно обновить программы. Можно скорректировать матрицу. Но если сам процесс обучения выстроен с ошибками, всё это не даст нужного результата. Именно поэтому я обновила с…
Почему вообще важно разбираться в спорных ситуациях? Потому что по ситуации выше на первый взгляд кажется, что это всего лишь вопрос периодичности. Но на практике от ответа зависит, как выстроить процесс. ❗️ И здесь важно внимательно читать формулировки норм: не додумывать за законодателя, а понять эту норму. У меня по этому вопросу уже есть своя позиция без разъяснения Минтруда. На мастер-классе объясню, какой в…
👍1
Как вы выстроите процесс?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Принимаем решение После 31 августа 2026 года периодичность обучения по программе В для работников, выполняющих работы повышенной опасности, составит не реже одного раза в три года. А также обучение работников требованиям охраны труда в соответствии с правилами по охране труда относится к обучению по программе В. При этом в некоторых отраслевых правилах сохранилось требование проводить проверку знаний ежегодно. Ес…
❓ А вы уверены, что видите ошибки? 🤝 Недавно у меня была встреча с представителями учебного центра. Мы обсуждали автоматизацию инструктажей по охране труда и пожарной безопасности. И когда мне начали показывать, как работает платформа, я практически сразу увидела то, что не состыковывается с действующим законодательством. Например, в системе был предусмотрен инструктаж по оказанию первой помощи. И это только один …
❤4👍2🥰1
Как навести порядок в обучении с учетом изменений Можно подробно изучить все изменения. Можно скачать новые шаблоны. Можно переписать положение об обучении. Можно обновить программы обучения. ❗️ Но если сам процесс обучения в компании изначально выстроен с ошибками, новые требования порядок не наведут. Наоборот. Старые ошибки + новые требования = увеличение количества рисков. Именно поэтому после изменений в Пост…
👍2
Изменения в Постановление №2464 разобрали. Теперь переходим к практике Напомню, что совсем недавно я подробно разбирала изменения, которые внесли в Постановление №2464. Получилось целых 6 частей. Ссылки на все части сможете найти в этом посте. Но я всегда говорю: знать изменения в законодательстве и уметь применить их в своей организации - совершенно разные вещи. Прочитать новую редакцию Постановления можно. А да…
👍5❤1
Мысли по следам просмотра фильма «Майкл» На выходных мы посмотрели нашумевший фильм «Майкл», в котором показали начало его пути. И было несколько моментов, которые меня зацепили. 1️⃣ Он сам себя мотивировал Писал фразы на листочках. Напоминал себе, кто он, куда идёт и зачем ему всё это. Он был уверен в своём успехе ещё до того, как этот успех стал очевиден для других. Для меня это очень сильная история про внутр…
👍8❤3🔥2👏1😁1
Кашина Анастасия-эксперт по охране труда pinned a photo
Video message, posted without a caption
❤4
Showing the 12 most recent of 25 posts we hold for @kashinasot. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Как вы выстроите процесс?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2026 to 11 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 638,665 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Кашина Анастасия-эксперт по охране труда” (@kashinasot), 5,572 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kashinasot.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.