https://dexscreener.com/ethereum/0x03494856e127663AF7A5226855EC3841D0d0b57e My bet for the cat season

Channel
UniApes 🦍
@UniApes
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
641subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001488488265 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @UniApes |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/UniApes |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 06:05 | 641 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 03:42 | 642 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:46 | 642 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 6 December 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 October 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Recent posts
https://x.com/deeep0_0/status/1843318458311917852
tweeting something
https://x.com/deeep0_0/status/1813651180314386639
https://x.com/deeep0_0/status/1813206348169121808
https://x.com/mineaitoken https://t.me/MineAI_Official
https://dexscreener.com/ethereum/0x9095c2c603e578d4d3d074fc383433ee18901391 degen for now. but looks good from what i read $MAI - 80k marketcap
https://dexscreener.com/ethereum/0x511d0427b865d17c029f13c535ed5170d8c51aeb buying this new launch https://x.com/readme_media circulating is less than 15%
https://x.com/deeep0_0/status/1737843102910722268?s=46&t=8xKkRtwiTpIpkllh4eEtoA Mission mars is live 🧑🚀
https://www.dextools.io/app/en/ether/pair-explorer/0xdc75e957e13487224c273fba04b2a4cf9a325a57 GCR confirmed in $TREE hes in for $250k+ Been slowly DCAing this one since launch Best news trading terminal out, soon subscriptions will allow access to the terminal + their discord.
https://dexscreener.com/ethereum/0x26be65d3b79acbcc1bf5a82f8b631ada2dc860c8 moon if no rug 🦮 https://t.me/jotchuaeth
bought some of this $AARDVARK $HPOS bitcoin kinda vibe
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @UniApes. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@UniApes named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“UniApes 🦍” (@UniApes), 641 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/UniApes.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.