Прямо как я - когда покупаю в Корзинке лепешку, половину съедаю пока домой дойду. Видео: @tashkentpeshkom #вместотысячисловкот @KurbanoffNet

Channel
Kurbanoff.net
@kurbanoffnet
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
14,704subscribers
+14 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001135609278 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @kurbanoffnet |
| Description | Всё про платежи, мошенничество, данные и регуляторику Узбекистана. И еще немного про жизнь. Всё написанное — личное ИМХО частного лица. Связь: @KurbanoffNetBot Канал на узбекском языке - @KurbanoffYoq |
| Created | 3 August 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 10 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/kurbanoffnet |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 00:15 | 14,704 | +2 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 15:44 | 14,702 | +2 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 15:34 | 14,700 | -9 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 15:31 | 14,709 | -1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 19:02 | 14,710 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 20:14 | 14,711 | +6 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:56 | 14,705 | +12 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 21:12 | 14,693 | +3 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 02:21 | 14,690 | no change |
| 5 Aug 2026, 22:02 | 14,690 | first reading |
Engagement
34 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 20 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 53.9%
- avg views ÷ 14,704 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 7,920
- 34 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.344%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 34
- of 34 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 22 of 34 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 34 (31 July 2026 – 13 August 2026) |
| Views total | 269,380 |
| Reactions total | 600 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 15 Aug 2026, 09:10 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈2,840
- Videos
- ≈571
- Links
- ≈3,770
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 3m 06s
- Average length
- 47s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
600 reactions across 3 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🎉 | 600 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 34 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 600reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 34 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 13 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 321
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 20
- of 34 we hold a reading for · 59%
- Most on one post
- 105
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @kurbanoffnet. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 34 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 July 2026 to 13 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Advertising
- Ad load
- 5.88%
- 2 of 34 posts carry an ad marker
- Regulatory tokens
- 0
- none — marked by hashtag only
- Median views · ads
- 5,440
- over 2 measured posts
- Median views · rest
- 7,260
- over 32 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Measured over the 34 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 13 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Recent posts
Жители махалли «Аккурган» Мирзо-Улугбекского района через суд добились отмены решения о строительстве нового центра махалли. В ходе разбирательства установлено, что действующее здание комитета пригодно для работы, а согласие жителей на строительство нового здания получено не было. Что то мне подсказывает, что сейчас самый удобный момент отстоять свои права в суде, если в вашей махалле тоже неожиданно решили построит…
А что опять случилось с электричеством в городе? svetanet.uz @KurbanoffNet
Гипсокартон обычно выбирают по характеристикам. KNAUF решил показать их вживую На выходных в Central Park компания KNAUF устроила довольно необычную демонстрацию своих решений: вместо привычных рекламных обещаний посетителям предложили самим проверить, насколько прочными могут быть гипсокартонные конструкции. На площадке можно было увидеть перегородки изнутри, проверить их устойчивость, посмотреть, как на них крепя…
В даркнете появилась база, которая, как утверждается, содержит персональные данные 15 млн жителей Казахстана. По информации телеграм канала Mash данные выставил на продажу пользователь под ником shymzz13. По данным канала, файл весит около 2,7 ГБ и содержит 47 млн строк. Продавец утверждает, что в массиве есть паспортные данные, номера телефонов, электронная почта, пароли, информация о местах работы и даже сканы до…
В далеком 2017 году начал сотрудничать с Газета.уз и даже написал пару тройку статей для них. Одной из важных для меня была статья про замену водительских прав. Если кто уже не помнит, раньше у нас были обычные бумажные водительские удостоверения и одной из важнейших действий после ее получения была их ламинация. Так вот, в марте 2017 года выходит постановление Кабинета министров о том, что с 1 октября 2017 года их…
В социальных сетях распространилось видео, на котором водитель мотоцикла едет со скоростью более 210 км/ч на участке с ограничением 60 км/ч и снимает происходящее на камеру. В отношении нарушителя был оформлен административный протокол по статье 128-3 Кодекса об административной ответственности за превышение установленной скорости движения. Мотоцикл временно поместили на штрафную стоянку. Превышение водителями транс…
Пыль, пришедшая со стороны Сырдарьи, накрыла ненавидимый самизнаетекем город. Исчезли новые мосты, соединяющие Сергели с настоящим городом, опустилась с неба бездна и залила крылья птицы над Новым Узбекистаном, дворец форумов, крышу небоскреба Нест Ван, базары, переулки Ташкент сити – великий город, как будто не существовал на свете. © @KurbanoffNet
Надеюсь дожить до тех времён, когда ЦОДД сможет предложить решение по улучшению ситуации по этому отрезку улицы Махтумкули. @KurbanoffNet
Понедельник? Уже? #вместотысячисловкот @KurbanoffNet
за последние три года Узбекистан поднялся на 25 позиций в рейтинге, оценивающем развитие искусственного интеллекта, и сейчас занимает 62-е место. Власти поставили задачу подняться еще на 12 позиций и войти в топ-50 уже к 2029 году. до 2030 года уже подписаны соглашения о привлечении более $6 млрд частных инвестиций. В рамках этих проектов предполагается создать вычислительную инфраструктуру общей мощностью 800 МВт. …
Ожидание: С помощью ИИ оптимизированы процессы ... внедрены новые технологии ... Реальность: хокимият Навои обработал с помощью ИИ фотографии об итогах «ударных 40 дней». Цифровизация, которую мы заслужили. @KurbanoffNet
Showing the 12 most recent of 34 posts we hold for @kurbanoffnet. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 11,357 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@budni_bezdelnicka · 2343 postsЛюбопытный скептик
@ishonkulov_nur · 4392 postsКоммуналка❗️ 🏠 КАНАЛ ‼️
@komoffuz · 3,8602 postsНа Бегу
@na_begu · 5,2622 postsНаблюдения под чинарой 🌳
@nobody_cares_but · 12,7902 postsЭкономические и таможенные новости от АТБ | Официальный канал
@atbuz · 3,8081 postДела тонкие
@delatonkie · 1,4061 postПятницкий маркетинг
@fridaymark · 4,8481 postКОРАКУЗОЛОГИЯ
@korakozolog · 3,7551 postНовости от Насимова 📖
@nasimov · 2,7521 postPotrebitel.uz
@potrebiteluzbekistana · 41 postQo'ysangchi
@qoysangchi · 3051 postРегистан на связи
@registan_na_svyazi · 1041 postРемарки от Ремарка
@remarquue · 531 postsoulweb
@soulweb · 7,2151 postТашкент вокруг
@tashkentvokrug · 2,2591 post2000$+ vacanciesUZ
@TOPvacanciesUZ · 2,4351 postOtabek Raxmonberganov shaxsiy blogi
@ustozuzblog · 391 postМысли вслух
@vsegomoimisli · 2,0671 postПочему я хочу уехать отсюда
@WhyLeaveUzb · 71 post
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 30 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@nobody_cares_but · 12,79012 postsTROLL.UZ
@trolluz · 78,7547 postsНа Бегу
@na_begu · 5,2626 postsКоммуналка❗️ 🏠 КАНАЛ ‼️
@komoffuz · 3,8604 postsБУдни Bezdelnicka
@budni_bezdelnicka · 2343 postsЛюбопытный скептик
@ishonkulov_nur · 4392 postsКОРАКУЗОЛОГИЯ
@korakozolog · 3,7552 postsМижозлар учун!
@mijozbank · 5,2562 postsАйPulatov
@pulatov_kh · 4,7052 postssoulweb
@soulweb · 7,2152 postsbakiroo
@the_bakiroo · 60,5962 postsArchemistry | Urban
@archemistryurban · 2,5421 postAviaSpotter
@AviaSpotter · 3,2591 postCHAQIR (Zo`ring bormi?)
@chaqir2022 · 9201 postПятницкий маркетинг
@fridaymark · 4,8481 postDilmurod Yangiboev | DYDO :)
@golang_dells · 1,2631 postSadriddin Abdurahimov
@janob_marketolog · 5,3651 postНовости от Насимова 📖
@nasimov · 2,7521 postPaiziev24
@paiziev24 · 12,2051 postРегистан на связи
@registan_na_svyazi · 1041 postШпильки в ремонте👠
@shpilki_grande · 8151 postТашкент вокруг
@tashkentvokrug · 2,2591 post2000$+ vacanciesUZ
@TOPvacanciesUZ · 2,4351 postПочему я хочу уехать отсюда
@WhyLeaveUzb · 71 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@uzmdk · 201,158
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 11 August 2026
@hacks_excel · 285,425
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 10 August 2026
@kazan_bass · 120,035
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 14 August 2026
@MyGovUz · 263,934
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 10 August 2026
@ssvmatbuotkotibi · 122,487
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 14 August 2026
@Press_Secretary_Uz · 149,772
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 12 August 2026
@Shayx_Hazrat · 127,650
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 13 August 2026
@shmirziyoyev · 238,991
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 11 August 2026
@ssvuz · 121,174
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 14 August 2026
@uzbekvideo · 200,197
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 11 August 2026
@XORAZMLIKLAR · 187,526
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 14 August 2026
@uzedu · 104,876
Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 15 August 2026
@uzauzilmfan · 124,531
Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 14 August 2026
This channel appears in 13 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Kurbanoff.net” (@kurbanoffnet), 14,704 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kurbanoffnet.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.