Channel
@English_legko
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
8,869subscribers
-31 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001238343820 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @English_legko |
| Description | Учите английский легко! С нуля и с озвучкой. Категория: от 1+ до 99+ Для связи Админ (по всем вопросам) @Englegko Отзывы @Reklama_Vam Менеджер по рекламе @ManagerOXM |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/English_legko |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 21:08 | 8,869 | -6 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 02:23 | 8,875 | -17 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 00:29 | 8,892 | -7 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:56 | 8,899 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 05:51 | 8,900 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 19 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 18 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
311 reactions across 17 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 69.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 215 | 69.1% | |
| 🔥 | 41 | 13.2% | |
| 👌 | 30 | 9.65% | |
| 👏 | 25 | 8.04% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 311reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 19 February 2026 to 1 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
КТО СЪЕЛ ВСЕ ПРЕДЛОГИ ВМЕСТЕ С АРТИКЛЯМИ 🙀?!!! (продолжение к теме "предлоги времени") Да, есть в английском и такие слова, которые "съедают" предлог и артикль: • last (прошлый), • next (следующий), • every (каждый) а также • yesterday (вчера) • tomorrow (завтра). и указательные this/ that/ these/ those, 👉 Давайте сначала рассмотрим первую троицу: ▪️I saw her LAST Friday - Я видел ее в прошлую пятницу. ▪️We’l…
👍23🔥9👌5
Итак, мой отпуск закончился 😿, надо возвращаться к работе! Мы остановились на непростой , но очень важной теме "предлоги времени". Они не совпадают с русскими, поэтому легко ошибиться, рассчитывая на интуицию. Основную часть мы уже прошли в последних постах и даже на игре закрепили... Но вдруг БАЦ! Куда-то предлоги делись! И артиклей не видно... А это ....
👍3🔥1
👉 С точным указанием времени употребляем всегда АТ: • at 4 o'clock • at 11 a.m. • at 8 p.m. 👉 С временем суток есть варианты: IN the morning - утром IN the afternoon - днем IN the evening - вечером 🚩Но при этом: AT night - ночью AT noon - в полдень AT midnight - в полночь Как запомнить: noon и midnight - это 12:00, а точное время всегда с предлогом "at". А ещe noon и night начинаются с "n". Да, понимаю, такое с…
👍20🔥4👌1
https://wordwall.net/ru/resource/114003926
👍10🔥3
👉 Названия сезонов употребляемся с предлогом IN: IN summer - летом IN winter - зимой IN autumne - осенью IN spring - весной А ниже игра на употребление предлогов, о которых написано в последних постах: 🚩 нужно кликать только по "правильным" кротам))
🔥6
ПРЕДЛОГИ ВРЕМЕНИ и как их запомнить Предлоги времени в английском - это нечто! (хотя с русскими предлогами иностранцам отнюдь не легче)) Так что даже не пытайтесь искать сходства в предлогах в двух языках! Но что ж делать, - без них никуда, - будем учить, а я постараюсь сгруппировать их так, чтобы быстрее запомнить. 👉 С названиями месяцев пишем IN. 👉 И в каком году - тоже IN • in July • in August • in 2020 ▪️I w…
👍25👌6🔥3
Всем привет! Я давно не писала посты, ожидая изменений в какую-либо сторону, НО в любом случае БРОСАТЬ КАНАЛ Я НЕ СОБИРАЮСЬ. Это была просто техническая пауза с поиском достойной альтернативы для дублирования. И пока я нашла лишь временный вариант - сайт. Но просто продублировать посты из канала на сайте невозможно - стиль написания постов совсем не подходит для сайта. В результате неоправданно много времени тратится…
👍14🔥4👏1
Чтобы вы не скучали, вот еще маленький тест на WordWall. (на днях делала для третьего класса) Но не думайте, что всё так легко и просто! Основная задача - объяснить свой выбор ответа. Попробуйте! Если всё легко, поставьте 👌, а если не очень, то что-нибудь еще. https://wordwall.net/ru/resource/110062094
👌15👍11
Как Вы оцениваете свой уровень владения английским?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
С какой целью учите английский?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
На каких гаджетах вы чаще всего читаете этот канал и учите английский?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Всем привет! Ох и долго же я отсутствовала! Я всё делаю сайт 🙄 и чем дальше в лес... Меня немного отпустило, что ТГ еще усерднее не начали блокировать, но я понимаю, что за него могут взяться в любой момент (как это произошло в середине марта, при том, что сложности обещали только в апреле) В любом случае, я канал не брошу, пока ТГ хоть как-то выплывает, но всё равно приготовлю альтернативу) Рассказываю, как идут де…
👍9
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @English_legko. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Как Вы оцениваете свой уровень владения английским?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
С какой целью учите английский?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
На каких гаджетах вы чаще всего читаете этот канал и учите английский?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 19 February 2026 to 1 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 1,454,104 of 1,549,704entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Английский легко” (@English_legko), 8,869 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/English_legko.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.