Channel
@UnknownEnglish
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
6,181subscribers
-47 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001284261822 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @UnknownEnglish |
| Created | Between 1 April 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 23 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 23 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/UnknownEnglish |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 23 Aug 2026, 19:39 | 6,181 | -14 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 01:44 | 6,195 | -6 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 17:38 | 6,201 | -9 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 00:34 | 6,210 | -10 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 04:54 | 6,220 | -8 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:15 | 6,228 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:03 | 6,228 | first reading |
21 posts held, back to 19 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 5 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 21 (19 June 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2,310 |
| Reactions total | 18 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 03:25 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
114 reactions across 19 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 47 | 41.2% | |
| 👍 | 39 | 34.2% | |
| 🤔 | 21 | 18.4% | |
| 🤩 | 5 | 4.39% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 1.75% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 114reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 19 June 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
QUESTION Why is it correct to say "Thirty pounds is a lot of weight to lose," even though pounds seem plural? What's the rule here? It is not helpful to think in terms of “rules”. There is a logical relationship involved, and if you understand the logical relationship you will understand why the third-person singular form of the verb is used. “Thirty pounds” is a quantity and as such it is uncountable. It is measur…
🤩4❤1👍1🤔1
QUESTION Is "according to me" correct? There is nothing wrong with it grammatically, but it is logically awkward. We use “according to” only when we want to present some other source as the authority for what we are saying. If we are the source of the information, then it is not “according to”, since we are speaking on our own authority. If I know that something is true, I can say with confidence that it is true an…
👍3❤1🤔1
«Ubiquitous» - значит ❓
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤2👍2
Ꮋᴇиɜʙᴇдᴀнный ᴀнᴦᴧийᴄᴋий pinned «❓ Ищете надежного репетитора по иностранным языкам? ❗️Мы создали площадку Very English Репетитор (very-english.ru), где собраны лучшие квалифицированные преподаватели. ❓ Почему стоит выбрать именно нас: ▪️Быстро: регистрация в два клика. ▪️Выгодно: никаких…»
SALUBRIOUS səˈluːbrɪəs целебный, целительный, здоровый, полезный для здоровья •the salubrious mountain air and water — целебный горный воздух и вода •salubrious food — полезная еда •salubrious exercise — полезное упражнение •Fresh air and exercise are always salubrious.▫️Свежий воздух и физические упражнения всегда благотворно сказываются на здоровье. •'Salubrious'! That's just the word I was looking for.▫️"Целебны…
👍2
❓ Ищете надежного репетитора по иностранным языкам? ❗️Мы создали площадку Very English Репетитор (very-english.ru), где собраны лучшие квалифицированные преподаватели. ❓ Почему стоит выбрать именно нас: ▪️Быстро: регистрация в два клика. ▪️Выгодно: никаких комиссий ни до, ни после. ▪️Напрямую: все контакты преподавателей доступны сразу после авторизации. ⚡️ Переходите на very-english.ru и выбирайте своего идеальн…
EFFACE ɪˈfeɪs стирать, изглаживать, вычеркивать, принижать, затмевать, превосходить •the image on the coin is effaced — изображение на монете стёрлось •efface the boundaries — уничтожить границы; стереть границы •efface from mind — вычёркивать из памяти •Time cannot efface the memory of that day.▫️Время не может стереть память о том дне. •Nothing could efface her grief.▫️Ничто не могло стереть её горе. •She effaced…
❤5👍1
Posted without readable text
👏2
Posted without readable text
🤔4
DEIGN deɪn соблаговолить, снисходить, изволить, удостаивать •deign no reply — не удостоить ответом •He did not deign an answer.▫️Он не снизошёл до ответа. •He did not deign to speak.▫️Он не соизволил заговорить. •I wouldn't deign to answer that absurd accusation.▫️Я бы не удостоил ответом столь нелепые обвинения. ⭕️Unknown
❤6👍2🤩1
FULMINATE ˈfʊlmɪneɪt громить, взрываться, взрывать, сверкать, греметь, изливать гнев •fulminate against — метать громы и молнии •fulminate anathemas — сыпать проклятиями; осыпать бранью •fulminate orders — издавать громовые приказы •Many people are fulminating against the cruelty of blood sports.▫️Многие люди негодуют по поводу жестокости охотников. •The editorial fulminated against the proposed tax increase.▫️Реда…
👍7❤1
Would it be grammatically correct to use the word "would" twice in a sentence? For example: “I would not be surprised if he would win”. It isn’t wrong in English to use would twice in a sentence, but in standard constructions a would in the if-clause (“… if he would win.”) should be avoided. In your example, the acceptable form is “I would not be surprised if he won,” keeping would in the main clause and using a pas…
👍9
Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @UnknownEnglish. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
«Ubiquitous» - значит ❓
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 19 June 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ꮋᴇиɜʙᴇдᴀнный ᴀнᴦᴧийᴄᴋий” (@UnknownEnglish), 6,181 subscribers as measured 23 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/UnknownEnglish.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.