Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Happy Monday

@happymonday

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

42,034subscribers

-50 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001194120018
TypeChannel
Username@happymonday
Created3 January 2018measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/happymonday

Growth

41,98942,15042,069.56 August 2026 — 42,084 subscribers6 August 2026 — 42,084 subscribers6 August 2026 — 42,083 subscribers7 August 2026 — 42,103 subscribers8 August 2026 — 42,141 subscribers9 August 2026 — 42,150 subscribers10 August 2026 — 42,042 subscribers11 August 2026 — 41,989 subscribers12 August 2026 — 42,100 subscribers13 August 2026 — 42,034 subscribers42,0346 August 202613 August 2026
10 measurements spanning 7 days, net -50. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 41,965–42,174 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 11:2742,034-66
12 Aug 2026, 11:2342,100+111
11 Aug 2026, 09:4941,989-53
10 Aug 2026, 12:2242,042-108
9 Aug 2026, 09:1142,150+9
8 Aug 2026, 09:4542,141+38
7 Aug 2026, 07:1642,103+20
6 Aug 2026, 06:1042,083-1
6 Aug 2026, 05:3042,084no change
6 Aug 2026, 05:2742,084first reading

Engagement

40 posts held, back to 31 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
6.89%
avg views ÷ 42,034 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,900
40 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.294%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
40
of 40 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 37 of 40 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 August 2026
Posts held40 (31 July 202613 August 2026)
Views total115,800
Reactions total319
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Aug 2026, 08:55 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

231 reactions across 26 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 72.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
16772.3%
❤‍🔥156.49%
🔥156.49%
👍104.33%
😁93.90%
🤔93.90%
👏31.30%
😱31.30%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 37 of the 40 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 319reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 40 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 13 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

13 Aug 2026, 07:30 UTC≈1,280 views19 reactionsread 13 August 2026

​😳 Отакої! Досвід більше не гарантує найм. Новим стандартом стає наймання за потенціалом: компанії все частіше звертають увагу не на те, що кандидат уже вміє, а на те, як швидко він здатний навчитися нового. Як роботодавці вимірюють потенціал кандидатів під час відбору і що тепер робити пошукачам, розбирається Тамара Мітягіна, Head of Talent Acquisition Department в IT-компанії: https://cutt.ly/tyaNJ0zu

😁97😱3

12 Aug 2026, 16:15 UTC≈2,240 views4 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Вакансії у менеджменті та управлінні 💼 Зібрали ролі для тих, хто хоче розвиватися в управлінні командами, проєктами, продажами, маркетингом та операційними процесами — від Junior до керівних позицій. Скоріше переглядайте та відгукуйтесь: ▪️ Senior Project&Operations Manager до Polikam Hi-Tech ▪️ Key Account Manager Middle до Uklon ▪️ Mаркетинг менеджер/менеджерка до VIPCEM ▪️ Account Director до HAVAS Engage ▪️

4

12 Aug 2026, 13:15 UTC≈2,260 views13 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Придумали для вас гру 🎲 Умови такі: ви пишете у коментарях, яку суперсилу хотіли б мати для роботи. А перша людина, яка відповість на ваш коментар, вигадує для неї побічний ефект 😄

11🔥2

12 Aug 2026, 10:25 UTC≈2,810 views15 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

😱 Айтішка — все? Кількість вакансій в ІТ у 13 разів менша за кількість кандидатів. Такі дані наводить Djinni — і вони вже спричинили гарячі дискусії про майбутнє українського ІТ-ринку. Одні кажуть, що в ІТ більше немає можливостей, інші говорять про зворотнє. 👀 Що ж насправді відбувається з ринком? А ми вам зараз розкажемо: https://cutt.ly/4yaPQCot #newsHappyMonday

🤔84🔥3

12 Aug 2026, 08:50 UTC≈2,510 views6 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Відповідь експертки на резюме ↑ Що добре в резюме? ✓ резюме чудово структуроване та відповідає рівню Senior / Manager level; ✓ використано одноколонковий формат, який дає змогу ATS-системам коректно зчитувати інформацію з файлу; ✓ досвід описано сильною діловою англійською мовою за форматом STAR (Action verb + Context + Result) і вміщується на одній сторінці; ✓ наявні сильні результати та конкретні метрики; ✓ чітко

4🔥2

12 Aug 2026, 07:52 UTC≈2,240 viewsread 13 August 2026
Poll

Як оцінюєте резюме?

  1. 14%
  2. 20%
  3. 34%
  4. 44%
  5. 54%
  6. 66%
  7. 716%
  8. 821%
  9. 923%
  10. 1018%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

12 Aug 2026, 07:52 UTC≈2,350 views3 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Як перетворити хороший досвід на резюме, яке працює на вас? Розберемо на реальному прикладі 📝 Сьогодні у #прожарці — резюме Financial Analyst. А поради щодо його вдосконалення надасть Олександра Лоскутнікова, ATS-compliant Resume Writer. Незабаром опублікуємо фідбек експертки, а поки хочемо дізнатися ваші оцінки 👇

3

11 Aug 2026, 16:15 UTC≈2,920 views6 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Вакансії у маркетингу 📈 Якщо шукаєте роль, де можна не просто виконувати задачі, а впливати на бренд і результат бізнесу — перегляньте цю добірку. Тут є можливості для різних напрямів маркетингу та рівнів досвіду: ▪️ Loyalty and Engagement Lead до Uklon ▪️ Google Ads Demand Gen Specialist до BetterMe ▪️ Middle/Senior Social Media Manager & Content Creator до Triple A ▪️ Content Project Manager до BetterMe ▪️ Mа

6

11 Aug 2026, 10:25 UTC≈2,890 views21 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Батьки вчили нас бути хорошими людьми, бажали лише добра й наставляли на правильний шлях. Але деякі їхні поради в дорослому житті можуть зіграти проти нас ⛔ Вони впливають на те, скільки ми працюємо, скільки заробляємо і чи вміємо відстоювати себе. Американська коучиня назвала 5 таких установок. Перевірте, чи не керують вони вашою кар’єрою: https://cutt.ly/6yag3Rk2 #newsHappyMonday

❤‍🔥154🔥2

11 Aug 2026, 08:05 UTC≈3,000 views14 reactionsread 13 August 2026

​Інклюзивність на словах підтримують всі. А як щодо практики? В Україні працюють лише 20–29% людей з інвалідністю старше 18 років. Багато з них для працевлаштування потребують не абстрактної «готовності» компаній, а реального пристосування робочого місця й адаптації умов. Що це означає на практиці: які саме рішення потрібні, скільки вони коштують і чи допомагає з цим держава? Як зробити робоче місце доступнішим без

11👏3

10 Aug 2026, 16:15 UTC≈2,960 views7 reactionsread 13 August 2026

​Monday Match: вакансії для нового старту ⚡️ Зібрали найцікавіші пропозиції для тих, хто хоче працювати з продуктами, технологіями, контентом, комунікаціями, людьми чи соціальними проєктами. Наш топ вакансій: ▪️ Content Project Manager до BetterMe ▪️ Customer Experience Researcher до Uklon ▪️ Motion Designer/Video Editor до BetterMe ▪️ Product Manager до Київстар ▪️ Junior Sports PR Specialist до MEGOGO ▪️ Te

7

10 Aug 2026, 10:30 UTC≈2,930 views15 reactionsread 13 August 2026

​🫠 Чому ви втомлені, навіть якщо не зробили нічого особливого? Ви можете не мати жодного значного досягнення наприкінці дня, але відчувати таку втому, ніби відпрацювали дві зміни. Бо, найімовірніше, «нічого особливого» — це насправді купа роботи, яку просто ніхто не бачить, навіть ви. Що таке невидима робота, чия це насамперед проблема і що робити, якщо ви впізнали тут себе, розповідає сертифікована коучиня Віта Бл

11👍4

Showing the 12 most recent of 40 posts we hold for @happymonday. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

12 Aug 2026, 07:52 UTCAnonymous Poll77 voters

Як оцінюєте резюме?

  1. 14%
  2. 20%
  3. 34%
  4. 44%
  5. 54%
  6. 66%
  7. 716%
  8. 821%
  9. 923%
  10. 1018%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

7 Aug 2026, 10:30 UTCAnonymous Poll227 voters

Чи вплинула війна на ваше ставлення до роботи у цій сфері?

  1. До 24 лютого 2022 року я вже розглядав(-ла) роботу в громадському секторі11%
  2. Після початку повномасштабної війни почав(-ла) розглядати цей напрям19%
  3. Уже працюю в громадському секторі17%
  4. Не розглядаю роботу в громадському секторі31%
  5. Шукаю сенс не в роботі, а в інших сферах життя22%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

5 Aug 2026, 09:00 UTCAnonymous Poll111 voters

Як оцінюєте резюме?

  1. 11%
  2. 23%
  3. 33%
  4. 47%
  5. 511%
  6. 69%
  7. 723%
  8. 819%
  9. 912%
  10. 1014%

The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 40 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 13 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 485,204 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Happy Monday” (@happymonday), 42,034 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/happymonday.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.