Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

نواصولگرا

@noosoolgara

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

3,409subscribers

-354 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001774780200
TypeChannel
Username@noosoolgara
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/noosoolgara

Growth

3,4093,7633,5867 August 2026 — 3,763 subscribers7 August 2026 — 3,747 subscribers10 August 2026 — 3,565 subscribers13 August 2026 — 3,409 subscribers7 August 202613 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net -354. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,356–3,816 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 08:333,409-156
10 Aug 2026, 17:163,565-182
7 Aug 2026, 18:143,747-16
7 Aug 2026, 16:333,763first reading

Engagement

21 posts held, back to 18 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
9.93%
avg views ÷ 3,409 subscribers
Avg views / post
339
21 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.706%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
21
of 21 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 14 of 21 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held21 (18 July 20267 August 2026)
Views total7,111
Reactions total41
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 06:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

41 reactions across 14 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 95.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍3995.1%
👎24.88%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 41reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 18 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 16:42 UTC235 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

♨️ پیمان دفاعی مکه! 🔸 سفر رهبران پاکستان و ترکیه به عربستان و امضای پیمان نظامی مشترک فراتر از یک رویداد دیپلماتیک گذرا، حلقه‌ای از پازل بزرگ‌تر دگرگونی‌های امنیتی در خاورمیانه است. چه بسا میزبان این نشست بخواهد از این طریق در بحبوحه تنش‌های منطقه پایه‌های اولیه شکل گیری «ناتوی اسلامی» را بنیان نهد. 🔹 در دیداری سه جانبه یک پیمان دفاعی مشترک به امضا رسیده که در یک نامگذاری قابل تامل، "پیمان مکه" نام گرفته است. ریاست

👍1

4 Aug 2026, 17:29 UTC132 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

♨️ چرا ترامپ از تهدیداتش عقب نشینی می‌کند؟ 📮 نواصولگرا؛ رسانه‌ی عقلانیت و کارآمدی در بستر گفتمان انقلاب اسلامی 🔗 @noosoolgara

4 Aug 2026, 17:29 UTC553 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

♨️ چرا ترامپ از تهدیداتش عقب نشینی می‌کند؟ 🔸 پس از جنگ 12 روزه، من و گروهی از پژوهشگران اقتصاد سیاسی بارها توضیح دادیم که می‌توان بخش بزرگی از اقدامات و تصمیمات دونالد ترامپ را باتوجه به شاخص‌های اصلی و مهم اقتصادی آمریکا را تبیین کرد. شاخص‌هایی که در ترکیب باهم، پیش‌بینی قابل توجهی از رفتار احتمالی ترامپ را به ما می‌دهد. ما با همین شاخص‌ها علت خوش‌رفتاری ترامپ در فروردین 1404 با ایران و مذاکرات خوشبینانه او و در مر

👍3

2 Aug 2026, 17:34 UTC184 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

💢 ولایتمداری سوپرانقلابی‌ها: «به رهبری کاری نداشته باشید» 📮 نواصولگرا؛ رسانه‌ی عقلانیت و کارآمدی در بستر گفتمان انقلاب اسلامی 🔗 @noosoolgara

👍2

2 Aug 2026, 17:34 UTC656 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026

💢 ولایتمداری سوپرانقلابی‌ها: «به رهبری کاری نداشته باشید» 🔸 میثم نیلی به عنوان یکی از لیدرهای جریان سوپرانقلابی، منطق خود برای ولایتمداری را به وضوح و بدون رودربایستی بیان کرده است. منطقی که ما قبلا بارها سعی کرده بودیم نشان دهیم و او حالا بدون آنکه خجالت بکشد، بیان می‌کند. نیلی در پاسخ به خانمی که خواستار «بالا بردن پلاکارد استعفای رئیس جمهور» است تا دست رهبری برای عزل پزشکیان باز شود، با لحنی مثبت و موافق می‌گوید

👍5👎1

1 Aug 2026, 17:30 UTC464 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

♨️ ما ایرانی‌ها واقعاً خارق‌العاده هستیم 🔹 دقت کردید که ما ایرانی‌ها واقعاً خارق‌العاده هستیم. این یک جمله احساسی نیست که بگوییم بله ایرانی‌ها در طول تاریخ احساسی بوده‌اند و حالا من می‌خواهم با عاطفه برای خودمان روایتی از واقعیت بسازم. منظورم جنگ و امر نظامی نیست. حداقل در این متن نیست. مسئله من واقعیت ساخت و بازسازی است که ما ایرانی‌ها را واقعاً خارق‌العاده می‌کند. دشمن واقعاً به ما ضربات جدی زد. چه در جنگ ۴۰ روزه

👍2

29 Jul 2026, 17:32 UTC201 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

♨️ فرصت بازسازی، تقویت و ارتقای نیروهای مسلح 📮 نواصولگرا؛ رسانه‌ی عقلانیت و کارآمدی در بستر گفتمان انقلاب اسلامی 🔗 @noosoolgara

29 Jul 2026, 17:32 UTC390 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026

♨️ فرصت بازسازی، تقویت و ارتقای نیروهای مسلح 🔹 تفاوت میزان دقت و موفقیت شلیک‌های نیروهای مسلح کشورمان در درگیری اخیر برای همه واضح است. تفاوتی حیرت‌انگیز که خطای شلیک را به حداقل رسانده و دشمن را به شدت ترسانده است. این میزان از دقت با تعداد کمتر شلیک به دست آمده است. یعنی حالا سپاه و ارتش ما کمتر از جنگ 40 روزه موشک و پهباد می‌زنند اما دقیق‌تر و موثرتر اصابت می‌کند. این ارتقای قابل توجه، نتیجه تجربه دو جنگ 12 و 40

👍4

28 Jul 2026, 17:30 UTC188 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🔻 فلاحت‌پیشه هم نمی‌فهمد و هم نمی‌خواهد که بفهمد 📮 نواصولگرا؛ رسانه‌ی عقلانیت و کارآمدی در بستر گفتمان انقلاب اسلامی 🔗 @noosoolgara

28 Jul 2026, 17:30 UTC351 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026

🔻 فلاحت‌پیشه هم نمی‌فهمد و هم نمی‌خواهد که بفهمد 🔸 فلاحت‌پیشه گفته است که راهبردی که می‌گفت در سوریه و لبنان بجنگیم تا مجبور نباشیم در تهران و کرمانشاه بجنگیم اشتباه بوده و موجب فتنه شده است. این جماعت دقیقا در لحظه‌ای که فکر می‌کنیم از گذشته درس گرفته‌اند، چیزی به زبان می‌آورند که آدم را حیرت‌زده می‌کند. 🔹 اولا این جمله معروف اساسا مربوط به جنگ با آمریکا نیست و فلاحت‌پیشه آن را از ظرف اصلی زمانی و موقعیتی خود خارج

👍4

27 Jul 2026, 17:29 UTC353 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

♨️ تأکید بر بند اول تفاهم‌نامه به‌عنوان سند تعهد به حزب‌الله 🔹 حضرت آیت‌الله سیدمجتبی حسینی خامنه‌ای رهبر معظم انقلاب اسلامی، در پاسخ به نامه اعلام بیعت و وفاداری دبیرکل و رزمندگان مؤمن و شجاع حزب‌الله لبنان، با اشاره به پیشگامی این جنبش در مبارزه با دشمن صهیونیستی و الهام‌بخشی آن برای ملت‌های آزاده جهان، بر استمرار سیاست راهبردی جمهوری اسلامی ایران در دفاع از مجاهدان لبنان تأکید فرمودند. رهبر انقلاب در بخشی از پیام

👍2

25 Jul 2026, 17:57 UTC410 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

💢 کنترل تنگه هرمز متعلق به ایران است 🔹 مشخص است که نمی‌توان درباره مالکیت تنگه هرمز سخنی گفت و بعد ادعا کرد «چون زور داریم و رئالیست هستیم، این را می‌گوییم». چراکه ما معتقدین به اسلام سیاسی امام خمینی (ره) هستیم و نه ظلم می‌کنیم و نه ظلم می‌پذیریم. پس با زبان ظلم و زور با دنیا سخن نخواهیم گفت. اما وقتی درباره «کنترل تنگه هرمز» سخن می‌گوییم باید مشخصا بگوییم که این حق ماست. چراکه از این تنگه برای دشمن ما سواستفاده نظ

👍3

Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @noosoolgara. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 243,745 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

تلویزیون روایت فردا | RFT
@revayatfarda · 203,099
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 11 August 2026
روزپلاس
@roozplus_ir · 206,967
Telegram ranks this channel #89 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 11 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“نواصولگرا” (@noosoolgara), 3,409 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/noosoolgara.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.