02.pdf https://cdn.sharghdaily.com/servev2/JAEb5aSBkI0G/XWP1koe8m0TYUtrTwgHQouAvAAHAGWE5m5QQQgs3j4ZKOt6AKEEy585L3TJ0BrvfMU54ulTtHTpIpiFU4jecsA,,/02.pdf

Channel
محمود صادقی
@drmsadeqi
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
3,837subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001026319294 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @drmsadeqi |
| Created | 28 January 2016 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/drmsadeqi |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 00:14 | 3,837 | +1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 16:21 | 3,836 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 05:40 | 3,835 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 04:22 | 3,836 | no change |
| 5 Aug 2026, 19:28 | 3,836 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 4 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 17.6%
- avg views ÷ 3,837 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 676
- 19 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 19
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (4 July 2026 – 5 August 2026) |
| Views total | 12,852 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 06:02 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 15m 00s
- Average length
- 2m 30s
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
دفتر رهبر انقلاب: ادعای درباره واکنش رهبر انقلاب به نامه رئیس جمهور کذب است روابط عمومی دفتر رهبر انقلاب: 🔹 مرجع رسمی انتشار پیام ها، اخبار و مطالب مرتبط با آیتالله سیدمجتبی حسینی خامنهای، دفتر ایشان و دفتر حفظ و نشر آثار رهبر انقلاب است و هرگونه مطالبی خارج از این چهارچوب فاقد سندیت و صحت است. 🔹رهبرمعظم انقلاب اسلامی در پیام های خود از جمله در پیام اخیر بر حفظ اتحاد مقدس و حفظ حرمت مسئولان دلسوز و خدمتگزاران نظ…
سید مهدی طباطبایی: ادعای استعفای رئیسجمهور واهی و کذب محض است/ ائتلاف شوم خناسان دروغگو و اصحاب افراط و بیتدبیری اتحاد مقدس و انسجام ملی را نشانه رفته است ✍معاون ارتباطات و اطلاعرسانی دفتر رئیس جمهور در شبکه اجتماعی ایکس نوشت؛ ادعای استعفای رئیسجمهور واهی و کذب محض است. ائتلاف شوم خناسان دروغگو و اصحاب افراط و بیتدبیری اتحاد مقدس و انسجام ملی را نشانه رفته است. دو سال از ناکامی شان در میدان ملی انتخابات گذشت…
🎥گزارش به مردم گفتگوی صادقانه رئیس جمهور با مردم در چهار قسمت و از امشب منتشر می شود. 🔻در این گزارش صریح، دکتر مسعود پزشکیان ضمن بیان دستاوردها و اقدامات دولت در دو سال گذشته پیرامون موضوعات روز به ویژه موضوع جنگ و مذاکرات صحبت کرده است.
. چرا اصلاحات قیمتی در شرایط فوقالعاده پاسخگو نیست؟ دکتر زهرا کریمی؛ استاد اقتصاد بازنشسته دانشگاه مازندران 🔹ناترازی بنزین در ایران، فراتر از یک چالش اقتصادی، به بحرانی ساختاری و امنیتی در سایه تحریمها و شرایط جنگی تبدیل شده است. 🔹قاچاق روزانه حدود ۲۰ میلیون لیتر بنزین و شکاف عمیق قیمتی با کشورهای همسایه، با افزایش قیمتهای داخلی قابلحل نیست؛ چرا که نوسانات ارزی بهسرعت هرگونه تعدیل قیمتی را خنثی میکند. 🔹در ش…
♨ سخنگوی سپاه پاسخ میدهد: 🔴 آتشبس سه ماهه به ضرر ایران بود یا آمریکا؟ ✔سپاه هم بخشی از نظام است و وقتی نظام به تصمیمی رسیده، حتما سپاه هم تمکین خواهد کرد ✔ ما در این مدت از فرصت استفاده کردیم، برخلاف آمریکا که ذخایر نفتاش نشان میدهد نتوانسته از این فرصت استفاده کند. ✔ اینکه کسی بگوید آمریکا از این فرصت استفاده کرد تا تجهیزات در منطقه بیاورد هم اینطور نیست، چون آمریکا در طول جنگ نیز مرتباً تجهیزات میآورد و من…
⭕️ محمود صادقی: با وجود هماهنگی کامل ارکان نظام، اتهام سازشکاری قابل درک نیست ⭕️ تصمیمگیری در سطح کلان، مستلزم سیاستگذاری صحیح درباره امکانات تریبونی و رسانهای است ⭕️ رسانه ملی نباید صرفا در اختیار یک طیف قرار گیرد؛ آن هم در شرایطی که دولت، بیشترین بار مسئولیت را در دوره جنگ بر دوش کشیده و به اذعان همگان، تقریباً به بهترین شکل ممکن کشور را اداره کرده است ⭕️ گویی تلویزیون خود را در برابر دولت تعریف میکند ⭕️ نم…
Photo, posted without a caption
با وجود هماهنگی کامل ارکان نظام، اتهام سازشکاری قابل درک نیست https://irannewspaper.ir/9080/3/159252
🇺🇸 آیا روسیه و چین به ایران کمک میکنند، و اگر بله، چگونه؟ ادعای هگست: ▫️راههایی وجود دارد که هر دو کشور، در سطوح مختلف، به برخی از اقداماتی که ایران انجام میدهد، کمک میکنند. بله. ▫️جنگ با ایران برای ایالات متحده ۳۷.۵ میلیارد دلار هزینه داشته است. ▫️از بین بردن کامل هر قایق تندروی ایرانی که مسلسل روی آن نصب شده، یا هر موشک کروز شلیکشده غیرممکن است. @KhabarOnline_ir | Khabaronline.ir
فاکسنیوز، ترجمه ماشین: خبر فوری: معترضان چندین بار جلسه ادای شهادت پیت هگست، وزیر جنگ، در برابر مجلس سنا را مختل کردند و پلاکاردهایی با نوشته «نه به جنگ با ایران» در دست گرفتند. صدای یکی از معترضان شنیده شد که فریاد میزد: «دستهایت به خون آلوده است.» پلیس کنگره هر چهار معترض را از جلسه بیرون برد. FoxNews
ولی نصر: چهار سیگنال به تهران که تفاهم هرگز اجرا نخواهد شد علیرضا دوستدار دانشگاه شیکاگو علی واعظ، عضو گروه بینالمللی بحران، از ولی نصر [استاد دانشگاه جانهاپکینز] پرسید که چرا ایران باید یک توافق به ظاهر سخاوتمندانه با آمریکا را فدای کنترل تنگه هرمز کند؛ آن هم شامل یک کریدور جنوبی که در بهترین حالت تنها ۲۰ درصد از ترافیک دریایی را پوشش میدهد. ولی نصر با رد این فرض، استدلال کرد که تهران از همان ابتدا به این نتی…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @drmsadeqi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 445,720 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@drmsadeqi named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“محمود صادقی” (@drmsadeqi), 3,837 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/drmsadeqi.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.