International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 78% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Previous handles
Recorded in 2019 as “کانال روزنامه وطن امروز” — the title held for this same channel (matched by Telegram id, not by handle) in the Pushshift Telegram Dataset, a third-party archive captured in 2019-2020, years before this register made its own first observation. CC BY 4.0, Baumgartner, Zannettou, Squire & Blackburn (2020), Zenodo. A third party’s dated snapshot, not a measurement this register made itself.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Content that also appears on other registered channels
Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 12 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 528 of the 528 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 1,372 comparable posts for this entry, running 5 August 2026 to 11 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).
Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_mutual · clone_source, last confirmed 12 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Growth
64 measurements spanning 98 days, net -9,484. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,231–35,208 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 64
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
11 Nov 2026, 21:06
16,118
-208
9 Nov 2026, 21:09
16,326
-87
8 Nov 2026, 12:50
16,413
-166
7 Nov 2026, 06:19
16,579
-170
6 Nov 2026, 02:00
16,749
-92
4 Nov 2026, 22:48
16,841
-9
3 Nov 2026, 21:07
16,850
-8
2 Nov 2026, 18:31
16,858
-39
1 Nov 2026, 17:40
16,897
-244
31 Oct 2026, 14:16
17,141
-237
30 Oct 2026, 16:17
17,378
-308
29 Oct 2026, 16:58
17,686
-280
28 Oct 2026, 15:40
17,966
-282
27 Oct 2026, 17:57
18,248
-217
26 Oct 2026, 15:38
18,465
-393
25 Oct 2026, 15:56
18,858
-222
24 Oct 2026, 15:17
19,080
-316
23 Oct 2026, 18:50
19,396
-324
22 Oct 2026, 16:28
19,720
-454
21 Oct 2026, 11:17
20,174
first reading
Engagement
1,571 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 109 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
19.0%
avg views ÷ 16,118 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,060
359 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
359
of 1,571 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 November 2026
Posts held
1,571 (5 August 2026 – 12 November 2026)
Views total
1,096,846
Reactions total
—
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Nov 2026, 18:32 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈16,700
Videos
≈4,820
Links
≈13,200
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
4h 54m
Average length
1m 35s
Measured directly from 185 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 4 of 359 posts held from the last 30 days (1.11%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
🔻هشدار تند بقائی به همدستان با عمل تجاوزکارانه نظامی یا تحریمی آمریکا علیه ایران
🔹اسماعیل، بقائی سخنگوی وزارت امور خارجه در واکنش به گزارشهای منتشره درباره احتمال تسلیمشدن برخی کشورها در برابر فشارهای آمریکا برای مداخله در تحولات منطقه و تنگه هرمز، در شبکه ایکس نوشت:
🔹گنجشکی که در پی لکلک پرواز کند، پاهایش خواهد شکست. (ضربالمثل کرهای) هرگونه مشارکت مستقیم یا غیرمستقیم در اقدامات تجاوزکارانه یا تروریسم اقتصادی …
🔻 بیانیه مشترک بنیامین نتانیاهو و گادی آیزنکوت
اسرائیل هیوم:
🔹جلسهٔ توجیهی امنیتی-سیاسی که به درخواست گادی آیزنکوت و با حضور بنیامین نتانیاهو و گای مارکیزانو، دبیر نظامی برگزار شد، دقایقی پیش به پایان رسید.
🔹در این جلسه، آیزنکوت با چالشهای امنیتی و سیاسی پیش روی اسرائیل در مقطع کنونی آشنا شد.
🔹طرفین توافق کردند که در صورت نیاز، به تبادل و بهروزرسانیهای اطلاعاتی و امنیتی ادامه دهند.
@vatanemrooz
🔻زلنسکی: یگانهای ما طی چند روز گذشته اختلالات قابلتوجهی را در عملکرد سامانه استارشیلد بر فراز خاک اوکراین ثبت کردهاند
🔹در این خصوص با خطاهای تصادفی مواجه نیستیم، بلکه این محدودیتهای سرعت بهصورت سیستماتیک اعمال میشوند.
🔹به همین علت تاکنون حملات روسیه به هدف خود رسیدهاند، زیرا سامانههای رهگیری ما قادر نیستند در زمان مناسب این پهپادها را رهگیری کنند.
@vatanemrooz
🔻۶ حمله موشکی یمن به مقرهای مزدوران سعودی در «لحج»
🔹️سخنگوی نیروهای مسلح یمن از ۶ عملیات علیه مراکز تجمع مزدوران سعودی در استان لحج خبر داد و گفت که این حملات با ۶ موشک بالستیک صورت گرفت و دهها کشته و زخمی در میان عناصر وابسته به ریاض بر جا گذاشت.
@vatanemrooz
🔻ادعای روزنامه اسرائیلی: تماس اخیر نتانیاهو و ترامپ مملو از فریاد بود
🔹روزنامه «یدیعوت آحارونوت» به نقل از مقامهای آمریکایی مدعی شد تماس تلفنی اخیر بنیامین نتانیاهو و دونالد ترامپ مملو از فریاد بوده است.
🔹بر اساس این گزارش، نتانیاهو پس از این تماس در سخنرانی خود در کنست، ایران را متهم کرد که در حال احیای برنامه هستهای است.
🔹وی همچنین مدعی شد تنها راه از بین بردن نهایی این تهدید موجودیتی، سرنگونی نظام ایران است.
…
🔻انصارالله: برای جنگ طولانی با عربستان، تجهیزات نظامی داریم
🔹عضو دفتر سیاسی جنبش انصارالله یمن گفت که دشمنان این کشور نباید هیچ حسابی بر روی اتمام ذخایر موشکی یا تجهیزات نظامی صنعا باز کنند.
🔹الفرح با انتشار پستی در صفحه شخصی خود در شبکه «ایکس» تصریح کرد، نیروهای ارتش یمن، تجربه ۱۲ سال جنگ دارند و از ماهیت تأسیسات و پایگاههای هدف، مساحت آنها و میزان قدرت تخریب لازم برای ضربه زدن به آنها مطلع هستند.
@vatanemrooz
🔻پشت پرده توییت ترامپ به روایت خبرنگار صهیونیست
🔹خبرنگار ویژه ایران در کانال ۱۴ اسرائیل درور بالازاده روز پنجشنبه با انتشار پیامی در شبکه اجتماعی ایکس از دلیل اظهارات جدید دونالد ترامپ درباره ایران پرده برداشت.
🔹وی در این باره اظهار داشت: «بر اساس اطلاعاتی که به دست ما رسیده، ایران در ۲۴ ساعت گذشته به قطر اعلام کرده که درباره برنامه هستهای خود مذاکره نخواهد کرد.»
🔹خبرنگار صهیونیست افزود: «قطر این پیام را به طرف آ…
🔻 پزشکیان: دشمن در برابر ایران به زانو درخواهد آمد
🔹رئیسجمهور در حاشیه اجلاس تغییرات اقلیمی سازمان ملل در آنتالیا، با رجب طیب اردوغان و لوئیس ایناسیو لولا دا سیلوا، رؤسای جمهور ترکیه و برزیل و همچنین رئیس اقلیم کردستان عراق دیدار و گفتوگو کرد.
🔹پزشکیان با اشاره به جنایات آمریکا و رژیم صهیونیستی علیه کشورمان، تصریح کرد: حق با ایران است و دشمن به زانو درخواهد آمد.
@vatanemrooz
🔻وال استریت ژورنال: ترامپ اخیرا در محافل خصوصی از یادداشت تفاهم منعقد شده با ایران، انتقاد کرده است
🔹ترامپ میگوید این توافق به ایران فرصت حیاتی داد تا پیش از محاصره دریایی، قوای خود را بازیابی کند و درآمدهای نفتی خود را افزایش دهد.
@vatanemrooz
🔻فایننشالتایمز: چین برای فرارکنندگان مالیاتی از طریق تراستهای خارج از کشور، مجازاتهای «شدید» تعیین میکند
🔹در پی تشدید نظارت بر ثروتمندترین افراد چین، درآمد حاصل از مالیات بر درآمد شخصی ۹۰ درصد افزایش یافت.
🔹چین اعلام کرده است که با افرادی که درآمد این تراستها را پنهان کنند و همچنین واسطههای کمککننده به فرار مالیاتی، برخورد قانونی و شدید خواهد کرد. درآمد مالیاتی حاصل از این اقدام در اکتبر بهشدت افزایش یافته …
Showing the 12 most recent of 1,571 posts we hold for @vatanemrooz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 1 post on @vatanemrooz as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
11 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
11 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
30 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 5 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
تلویزیون روایت فردا | RFT @revayatfarda · 392,947 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 11 August 2026
اخبار مجلس @AkhbarMajles1 · 47,752 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 25 August 2026
میز سبز | اخبار مجلس @MizSabz · 47,873 Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 25 August 2026
رصد اخبار | اخبار جنگ @Rasadeakhbaar · 20,263 Telegram ranks this channel #89 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 17 September 2026
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“روزنامه وطن امروز” (@vatanemrooz), 16,118 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vatanemrooz.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.