Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
26 measurements spanning 95 days, net -164. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,120–8,334 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 26
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
9 Nov 2026, 04:11
8,145
-6
5 Nov 2026, 16:07
8,151
-8
2 Nov 2026, 10:58
8,159
-7
30 Oct 2026, 05:09
8,166
-2
27 Oct 2026, 04:09
8,168
-4
23 Oct 2026, 22:45
8,172
-4
20 Oct 2026, 16:28
8,176
-1
17 Oct 2026, 15:46
8,177
-2
14 Oct 2026, 23:11
8,179
-1
11 Oct 2026, 21:39
8,180
-8
5 Oct 2026, 09:17
8,188
-8
26 Sept 2026, 22:15
8,196
-12
17 Sept 2026, 20:16
8,208
-7
13 Sept 2026, 11:01
8,215
-9
9 Sept 2026, 19:37
8,224
-4
4 Sept 2026, 04:57
8,228
-6
31 Aug 2026, 15:24
8,234
-4
29 Aug 2026, 00:29
8,238
-11
26 Aug 2026, 00:55
8,249
-1
22 Aug 2026, 15:47
8,250
first reading
Engagement
34 posts held, back to 29 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 39 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
27.4%
avg views ÷ 8,145 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,230
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.11%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 34 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 November 2026
Posts held
34 (29 March 2026 – 10 November 2026)
Views total
8,930
Reactions total
456
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
11 Nov 2026, 13:29 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
418
Videos
6
Links
201
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
4,987 reactions across 34 posts, in 25 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
2,179
43.7%
🔥
1,559
31.3%
❤
502
10.1%
🗿
326
6.54%
🤔
104
2.09%
😨
43
0.862%
🤝
38
0.762%
👌
34
0.682%
😱
31
0.622%
🎄
28
0.561%
🎅
23
0.461%
👻
23
0.461%
☃
22
0.441%
🏆
15
0.301%
👏
14
0.281%
🐳
13
0.261%
💘
7
0.14%
😎
6
0.12%
🍾
4
0.08%
🤩
4
0.08%
5 further kinds
12
0.241%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 34 of the 34 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,987 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 34 most recent posts we hold, published 29 March 2026 to 10 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
47
across the posts below
Posts paid on
19
of 34 we hold a reading for · 56%
Most on one post
15
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @kryptoklan. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 34 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 29 March 2026 to 10 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 4 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
📉 BITCOIN | 10 НОЯБРЯ. ВПЕРЕДИ ТРЕВОЖНЫЕ ДНИ
Как и предупреждал ранее, после 10 ноября риски усиления коррекционных движений возрастают.
Сегодня продажи заметно усилились.
Негативный момент в том, что в начале месяца Биткоину так и не удалось закрепиться выше $80 000.
📊 Сейчас ключевой уровень — $69 000.
🟢 Если удержимся выше $69 000, сохраняется сценарий достаточно быстрого восстановления BTC.
🔴 Если уйдём ниже $69 …
🚀 БИТКОИН И АЛЬТКОИНЫ: ПРОГНОЗ СНОВА ОТРАБАТЫВАЕТ!
📈 Период приоритетного роста набирает обороты!
Ещё 24 октября в нашей VIP-группе был опубликован прогноз, согласно которому со 2 по 9 ноября ожидался период с повышенной вероятностью роста криптоактивов.
И сейчас мы наблюдаем положительную динамику BTC и ряда альткоинов!
🎯 Рынок движется в рамках ранее обозначенного сценария.
И здесь хочу подчеркнуть важный момент.
Н…
📍 BITCOIN (BTC) | Прогноз на конец октября и ноябрь
📊 Основной сценарий движения BTC
По моим текущим аналитическим данным, в конце октября и на протяжении ноября ожидаю движение Биткоина преимущественно в ценовом диапазоне $73 000–86 000.
При этом допускаю кратковременные выходы за обозначенные границы:
🔻 Нижняя зона: $69 000–71 000 🔺 Верхняя зона: $87 000–89 000
Это возможные краткосрочные отклонения, а не основной …
📊 КРИПТОРЫНОК: ПРОГНОЗ ОТРАБОТАЛ. ЧТО ДАЛЬШЕ?
📌 Каждый месяц, 20–22 числа, в нашей VIP-группе публикуется подробный прогноз движения крипторынка с разбивкой по дням.
В прогнозе выделяются периоды, когда повышается вероятность:
📉 Коррекционных движений и снижения цен.
📈 Роста и восстановления рынка.
🔄 Смены рыночных тенденций.
Зачем это нужно?
Чтобы не действовать вслепую, а заранее выстраивать торговую стратегию: пла…
🔥Новая темная лошадка- новый ZEC на иксы.
Данный актив каждый откат по дну накапливали с теми кто находится на прямой консультации-подписка Консультант. Даже просто в 100х не писал про это.
Поэтому есть свой плюсы в личном общении.
Ребята думаю простят слив, так как на днях, мы уже начали работать по другому активу на потенциальных 100-300х.
Сейчас ракета оторвалась от дна. Но с учетом потенциала ( текущее это прим…
🔥 ZEC — огонь.
Не прошло и месяца, а актив уже подошёл к тому самому диапазону, который мы заранее отмечали как зону, где может начаться более масштабная фиксация прибыли.
Именно этот момент сейчас особенно интересно наблюдать. Буду внимательно следить за динамикой и анализировать дальнейшее развитие движения.
Но есть важный момент.
С текущих уровней получить те же иксы, которые были возможны при наборе до $40, уже з…
🔥 Крипторынок. Движемся точно по сценарию, который разбирали ранее.
Середина сентября — и мы уже видим реализацию первой части нашего прогноза.
Ряд криптовалют показал сильный рост, именно тот сценарий, который мы закладывали заранее. И сейчас важно не поддаваться эмоциям и не пытаться догонять движение.
⚠️ Дальше — зона, где необходимо становиться значительно осторожнее.
Коррекционные движения уже появляются. На тек…
Ориентир на закуп ZEC по 20$. Самая удачная инвестиция в публичной группе.
Надеюсь многие прислушались.
Чуть ранее на ютуб канале, также объяснял почему мой лидер и стоит брать ZEC, а не Dash или Monero.
Несмотря на некоторый хейт, время показало абсолютную правоту.
На подходе, еще один такой лидер со дна на новый 4 летний цикл.
Подписываемся и ждем информацию🤝.
Потом, через два года снова буду хвалиться😃
ZEC -также один из лидеров роста. Уже принес нам достаточно профита с закупа по дну.
Сейчас идет закрепление выше уровня 740$.
Удержание текущего диапазона: 760-800$, это дорога уже в давно ожидаемые уровни по росту:
1600-1800$, а при более мощных благоприятных обстоятельствах и выше.💪
🚨 КРИПТОРЫНОК: ЧТО ЖДЁМ ДАЛЬШЕ?
Сейчас рынок по-прежнему выглядит достаточно позитивно.
🚀 До середины сентября ожидаю продолжение роста, но движение, будет идти через локальные откаты и повышенную волатильность.
По Bitcoin потенциал роста ещё сохраняется.
А вот по части альткоинов жду вторую, более сильную волну движения.
📍При этом важно понимать:
это ещё не начало полноценного нового цикла роста.
По моему сценарию, …
🚨По альткоинам интереса не особо много.
В ВИП выделил несколько лидеров, с высоким интересом ММ и более гарантированным ростом на осеннем пампе!
Тут также, возможны изменения. Желающих поработать с альткоинами приглашаю в ВИП.
Вторая хорошая новость. Вход по акции со скидкой продлен еще на сутки!🔥🤝
🔥 ПОХОЖЕ, РЫНОК ГОТОВИТСЯ К ЖЁСТКОЙ ВСТРЯСКЕ
Флэт надоел? Мне тоже.
И я всё больше вижу признаки того, что период унылого движения может скоро закончиться.
Мой базовый сценарий — ещё один мощный пролив перед полноценным движением вверх.
Да, будет страшно.
Да, толпа снова начнёт паниковать и закрывать позиции в самый неподходящий момент.
И именно тогда могут появиться самые интересные возможности для тех, кто подготов…
👍56🔥16❤14☃7🤔7🗿3👻2😨2
Showing the 12 most recent of 34 posts we hold for @kryptoklan. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 1 post on @kryptoklan as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
28 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
28 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
16 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Эра Перемен — аналитическое агентство @eraperemenfinans · 78,555 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 19 August 2026
Богатейший Ди | Crypto @richdicrypto · 32,700 Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 19 September 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Главный Аналитик: Биткоин. Криптовалюты.” (@kryptoklan), 8,145 subscribers as measured 9 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kryptoklan.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.