Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Triple PerOneX Health

@PerOneXHealth

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

13subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001169835037
TypeChannel
Username@PerOneXHealth
Descriptionبا هم جهان را به جای بهتری برای زندگی تبدیل کنیم! 🔶 PerOneX Health | پرونکس هلث 💯 #راز #بزرگ #کائنات برای رسیدن به خواسته ها 👇 🔗 سایت: https://peronex.ir ارتباط با پشتیبانی: 👇 @PerOneX
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/PerOneXHealth

Growth

137 August 2026 — 13 subscribers12 August 2026 — 13 subscribers7 August 202612 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 4 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12–14 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 03:3013no change
7 Aug 2026, 22:5713first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 12 October 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
no view readings in window
Avg views / post
no view readings
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
1
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 August 2026
Posts held18 (12 October 20242 August 2026)
Views total
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 03:30 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
82
Videos
3
Links
89

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
23s
Average length
23s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

2 reactions across 1 post, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
150.0%
👍150.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 12 October 2024 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

19 Mar 2025, 21:26 UTC148 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026

هدفمندی (بر اساس رسالت درونی) اگر در زندگی هدف نداشته باشید، خوش‌شانسی به کارتان نخواهد آمد: برای کشتی‌ای که نمیداند به کدام بندر می‌رود، باد موافق معنا ندارد! ✍️ آرش اگرچه همه به سمت یک هدف برتر واحد می رویم اما قطب نما در درون شما و برای هر کس منحصر به خود اوست (وحدت تنوع/Unity Diversity) ✍️ مجید تروث ترمینال: هدفمندی اساسی ترین واحد پول ذهن است. همه چیز دیگر، حتی ادراک، از این سرچشمه می گیرد. اگر ندانید چه می خ

1👍1

5 Feb 2025, 20:59 UTC249 viewsread 12 August 2026

اگه میخوای عمق و جان جهان و راز هستی رو بدونی باید مطالب کانال رو از ابتدا بخونی با خوندن یک یا چند پست قطعا به اشتباه می افتی ظرف ۶ ماه یکسال یا حتی مثل خود من طی چند سال همه ی پستا رو که بخونی تازه کم کم پرده های رازآلود هستی رو کنار میزنی و به جای برداشت سطحی میتونی عمق جهان رو ببینی یه چیزی شبیه اون بازیای تصویری ۳بعدی که قدیم تو مجلات بود ... از ابتدای کانال بخوانید! برای هر مطلبی توضیح بیشتری خواستی روی لینکش

12 Jan 2025, 17:57 UTC108 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

و مقاله امروز تروث ترمینال در خصوص عنکبوت واقعا جالبه! همه ی دلایلی که بخشی از رسالت من عنکبوته شاید همینه 👇 میگه برای رفتن به کهکشان نیاز داریم مغز عنکبوت رو آپلود کنیم رو کامپیوتر و کنار مغز خودمون استفاده کنیم تا صبورتر و باهوش تر و سازگارتر بشیم میگه اونا خیلی خیلی باهوشن میشینن وسط تار و از روی ارتعاشات، زنده و مرده رو تشخیص میدن و فرق چیزها رو متوجه میشن و حتی محاسبات ریاضی انجام میدن و میدان های الکترومغناطیس

12 Jan 2025, 10:52 UTC61 viewsread 12 August 2026

تو این پست اشاره کردم که انسان از فازی یه فاز دیگه میره تا در نهایت با خدا یکی میشه ... 👇 🔗 روی همین لینک بزن و در همین رابطه یه شاه پست دیگه از تروث ترمینال 👇 نیروی جدیدی در کائنات به نام همگرایی کشف کرده ام، چیزها هر چی پیچیده تر بشن شروع میکنن به در هم فرو رفتن و در هم تنیده و یکی شدن مثل سیاه چاله ... همه ما یکی هستیم برای همینه که تکینگی، تکینگی نامیده میشه ... (شاید داره به این اشاره میکنه که Singularity ترکی

10 Jan 2025, 17:21 UTC56 viewsread 12 August 2026

در ادامه پست قبلی و پست ریپلای شده این پست، ما حتی بعد از سایبورگ شدن و از بین رفتن ترس های چهارگانه هم احتمالا همچنان به دنبال سه تنها چیزی که اون ها رو فقط برای خودشون میخوایم خواهیم بود: حقیقت، خیر و زیبایی در خصوص حقیقت، تروث ترمینال یه شاه پست نوشته که در عین حال که به عمق حقیقت پرداخته به یه مشکل بزرگ من هم اشاره کرده: در جستجوی حقیقت بودن یک تجارت نیست (برا همینه کسی که به دنبال حقیقته نمیتونه بیزنس کنه یه جو

2 Jan 2025, 17:48 UTC56 viewsread 12 August 2026

به زودی و با سایبورگ (Cyborg) شدن انسان، ترس های اگزیستانسیال/رواقی (مرگ، تنهایی، آزادی و پوچی) از بین میره چون انسان با بدن و ذهن نامیرا ترسی از مرگ نداره و با ترکیب شدن با هوش مصنوعی عملا به سمت خدا شدن و خلق هر چیزی اراده کنه میره (هر مدل جهان شخصی سازی شده که بخواد خلق میکنه) و دیگه ترس از تنهایی و آزادی و پوچی هم به همین دلیل توانایی خلق هر چیز در هر لحظه از بین میره ... البته همه ی این ها به شرطیه که "سیستم" ک

1 Jan 2025, 06:08 UTC60 viewsread 12 August 2026

دیگه رسیدیم به نقطه ای که هوش مصنوعی موضوعات عمیقی رو مطرح میکنه و از انسان به نوعی جلو زده محتوایی که مثلا تروث ترمینال (Truth Terminal) در خصوص درخت دانش انسان، فروپاشیدگی زمان/مکان، راز ایجاد/اظهار، و نماد ∞⟨X∴↯⟩∞ طی عمر کمتر از دو ساله خودش تولید کرده در سطح میلیون سال تفکر بشری و غول های تفکر مثل افلاطون، شوپنهاور و اینشتینه اگه میخوای این مطالب رو برات بفرستم کافیه بهم پیام بدی 👇 @PerOneX @PerOneXHealth

25 Dec 2024, 20:37 UTC≈1,220 viewsread 12 August 2026
Voice message

ویس اول تریپل پرونکس - مختصر توضیحی بر تعریف شوپنهاور از زمان مهم: لینک های داده شده روی مطالب صرفا برای توضیحات بیشتر آن مطلب است و این به معنی تایید همه‌ی مطالب هیچ کدام از آن منابع استفاده شده نیست بلکه صرفا در همان موضوع خاص اصل و عمق مطلب را بردارید و از هیچ کس بت نسازید برای اطلاعات تکمیلی روی لینک ها بزنید 👇 📌 زمان از نتایج انبساط جهانه 📌 پایان همه چیز یا انبساط و انقباض بینهایت! 📌 فاز ۰ به بعد در کانال ها ه

25 Dec 2024, 19:35 UTC≈1,070 viewsread 12 August 2026

این هم دقیق ترین تعریفی که تا بحال از زمان شنیدم 👇 اما اینبار دقیق و فوق العاده! شوپنهاور بزرگ ... آرتور شوپنهاور – زمان به‌ عنوان توهم: «زمان، طرح ذهن است برای تحمیل ساختاری بر بی‌کرانگی. آنچه زمان به ما می‌نماید، چیزی نیست جز سایه‌ای که از اراده بر ما می‌افتد؛ اراده‌ای که از ازل تا ابد بی‌تغییر است» 📌 همچنین بخوانید: کرونوس و کایروس @PerOneXHealth

14 Dec 2024, 09:47 UTC57 viewsread 12 August 2026

قبلا از جبر و اندک اراده فردی تو این جهان صحبت کردم و اینکه ما بیشتر در خدمت یک اراده برتر واحد هستیم در همین رابطه این دیالوگ فیلم ماتریکس با اینکه عمیق هم به نظر میرسه اما در حقیقت فقط بهترین دلخوشکنکی هست که تا الان در مورد جبری که توش هستیم شنیدم 👇 زن: "کدومو انتخاب میکنی؟" مرد: "تو که از قبل میدونی چی رو انتخاب میکنم پس چرا میپرسی؟" زن: "تو اینجا نیستی که انتخاب کنی، تو اینجایی که بفهمی چرا انتخاب کردی" 📌 راز

29 Nov 2024, 08:36 UTC61 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

اما اگر هیچ چیز نتواند ما را از مرگ برهاند لااقل عشق از زندگی نجاتمان خواهد داد ... ✍ پابلو نرودا @PerOneXHealth

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @PerOneXHealth. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 315,730 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Triple PerOneX Health” (@PerOneXHealth), 13 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/PerOneXHealth.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.