Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Союз Юристов, Судебных представителей

@Lawyer_Union

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

435subscribers

+4 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002728836812
TypeChannel
Username@Lawyer_Union
CreatedBetween 1 June 2025 and 31 August 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Lawyer_Union

Growth

4314354336 August 2026 — 431 subscribers7 August 2026 — 431 subscribers14 August 2026 — 435 subscribers6 August 202614 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net +4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 430–436 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 06:08435+4
7 Aug 2026, 14:20431no change
6 Aug 2026, 22:00431first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 22 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
33.2%
avg views ÷ 435 subscribers
Avg views / post
145
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held20 (22 July 20266 August 2026)
Views total2,891
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 22:00 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 15:51 UTC42 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Заявление Союза в ГП РФ в отношении неправомерных действий сотрудников при задержании Мельниченко Р.Г., перенаправлено в Прокуратуру Волгоградской области...

5 Aug 2026, 11:22 UTC134 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🏛 Официальный запрос политическим партиям: о позиции по «адвокатской монополии». В преддверии выборов в парламент НКО Союз «Юристов, судебных представителей» направил официальные запросы руководству ключевых политических партий России: «Единая Россия», «Новые люди», КПРФ, ЛДПР, «Справедливая Россия», «Яблоко». В чём суть проблемы: - Дискуссия о реформировании рынка юридических услуг и возможном введении так называем

3 Aug 2026, 08:03 UTC85 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Конференция „Стратегия развития адвокатуры“ · 31 июля 2026 года РЕЗОЛЮЦИЯ НКО "Союз юристов, судебных представителей" поддерживает в данной части резолюцию Конференции „Стратегия развития адвокатуры“ от 31 июля 2026 года.

1 Aug 2026, 22:47 UTC146 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

📚 ЛИТЕРАТУРНОЕ ВОСКРЕСЕНЬЕ Коллеги, какие правовые рекомендации мы могли бы дать персонажам «Трилогии Каммерера» братьев Стругацких (например, гражданам Саракша) или героям романа Джорджа Оруэлла «1984» в день выборов, который проходил бы в этих несуществующих мирах? Возможно, начать стоит со следующего: Фарс, бумага и истинное Право: как разумному человеку смотреть на «выборы без выбора»? В день голосования в вым

31 Jul 2026, 09:43 UTC81 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Союз с 2025 года призывал юристов объединиться и создать реальную политическую силу для защиты свободы, прав и интересов профессиональных судебных представителей. Многие откликнулись. Но подавляющее большинство предпочло прятаться и отсиживаться в стороне. Теперь эти «трепещущие» внезапно решили, что вправе давать нам советы, как правильно голосовать. Они на полном серьёзе предлагают искать защитников среди тех сам

30 Jul 2026, 23:05 UTC141 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

О наивности, иллюзиях и выборах в парламент... Год назад юристов частной практики фактически поставили перед фактом о введении в России «адвокатской монополии» и всем нам наглядно показали, как легко можно проигнорировать права и интересы тысяч специалистов, если у них нет единого голоса. Весь этот год мы призывали коллег к абсолютно логичному шагу - объединиться. Не для пустых споров, а чтобы стать реальной силой,

29 Jul 2026, 18:55 UTC91 viewsread 6 August 2026

не предана и не искривлена. III. Историческая необходимость и вечность понятия Права... Право, как субстанциональная форма свободы разумных существ намного шире и глубже любых временных искажений позитивного законодательства и настроений отдельной эпохи. Конформизм - это временно выродившаяся, преходящая форма правосознания. Позитивный закон, оторванный от разумной сущности Справедливости, неизбежно плодит внутре

29 Jul 2026, 18:55 UTC96 viewsread 6 August 2026

Приглашение к размышлению. "О достоинстве Правового Разума или почему нам следует оставить попытки переубеждения конформистов и сосредоточиться на удержании действительного Права" В истории всякой правовой культуры наступают периоды, когда позитивное законодательство и реальная государственно-правовая практика вступают в глубокий разрыв со своей разумной сущностью. В такие эпохи юрист неизбежно оказывается перед фу

29 Jul 2026, 07:49 UTC89 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Размышление и приглашение к обсуждению... В чём состоит обязанность юриста частной практики? В чём состоит обязанность юриста частной практики? Прежде всего — профессионально существовать, быть юристом по содержанию, а не казаться им по формальному признаку. Возможно ли юристу-одиночке достигнуть собственной объективации и утвердить себя в качестве действительного правоведа? Ответ на этот вопрос на первый взгляд к

26 Jul 2026, 19:51 UTC123 viewsread 6 August 2026

Приглашение к размышлению - «О достоинстве Правового Разума или почему нам следует оставить попытки переубеждения конформистов и сосредоточиться на удержании действительного Права» https://zakon.ru/blog/2026/7/26/priglashenie_k_razmyshleniyu_-_o_dostoinstve_pravovogo_razuma_ili_pochemu_nam_sleduet_ostavit_popytk

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Lawyer_Union. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 205,033 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Союз Юристов, Судебных представителей” (@Lawyer_Union), 435 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Lawyer_Union.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.