انسانشناسی بایومدیسین - پزشکی

Channel
انسانشناسی
@anthropology_ehtnology
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,978subscribers
+14 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002687788817 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @anthropology_ehtnology |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 12 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/anthropology_ehtnology |
Topic
Science — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 53% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 02:18 | 1,978 | +2 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 15:58 | 1,976 | -2 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 10:01 | 1,978 | +10 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 22:55 | 1,968 | -2 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 16:29 | 1,970 | +3 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 17:03 | 1,967 | -4 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 18:13 | 1,971 | -1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 05:36 | 1,972 | +5 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 03:23 | 1,967 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:38 | 1,966 | +2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:31 | 1,964 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:18 | 1,964 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 21 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
66 reactions across 17 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 89.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 59 | 89.4% | |
| 👏 | 4 | 6.06% | |
| 👍 | 3 | 4.55% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 66 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 June 2026 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
File, posted without a caption
https://youtu.be/XNus-xZ7_6Y?si=WMTmoLcrqBXYoB6Z
مدتها بود دوست داشتم درباره اندیشه سیاسی ایران باستان یه کارگاه برگزار کنم، ولی به دلایل مختلف هی عقب میافتاد. بالاخره تصمیم گرفتم از همینجا شروع کنم. به نظرم هر کسی، فارغ از اینکه دانشجوی چه رشتهایه یا چه دیدگاهی داره، خوبه یه آشنایی اولیه با اندیشه سیاسی داشته باشه. خیلی از مفاهیمی که امروز باهاشون سروکار داریم، ریشههای عمیقی توی تاریخ دارن و شناخت اونها کمک میکنه نگاه دقیقتری به گذشته و حتی امروز داشته باش…
❤3👏1
#ایده_تحقیق چطور یکسری شیوهها و عملکردهای درون فرهنگی در دیگر فرهنگها شایع میشن و چطور معناشون زیر و رو میشه و خودشون رو ریبرند میکنن و تبدیل به چه کالایی برای چه قشری و چه هدفی میشن.
❤7
مایندفولنس یک تکنیک بیطرفانه و کاربردی برای فاصله گرفتن از افکار نیست: پیش از هرچیز باید در نظر گرفت چطور ایدهای بودیستی را با خود حمل میکند و خود را یک مسئلهی ناپیدار و جدا از بدن تصور میکند و بعد چطور از کنار دلایل بوجود اومدن احساسات و افکار جدایی میگیرد و آن را صرفا به ناتوانی فرد در مدیریت این احساسات ربط میدهد در صورتی که احساسات فردی میتونن خبر از فجایع اجتماعی یا فردی بدن و نباید انکار بشن. - مقاله مر…
❤2
Ethics and Politics of Ethnographic Representation
❤1
از سایتهای مهم برای کند و کاو انسانشناسی https://www.anthropology-news.org/
❤4
AI is changing more than your writing, it may be shaping your worldview
👍3❤1
Posted without readable text
❤1
منباب پریود توی مطالعات انسانشناسی و بینفرهنگی وقتی بحث پریود وسط میاد یک نکته رو تقریبا مطالعات مشخص در نشون میدن و اون اینه که دربارهی پریود در هر فرهنگی تعریفات متنوعی وجود داره. گاهی به قدرت زنان ربط داده میشه و گاهی به ضعفشون. همین ربط دادنها به نظر میاد با اینکه زنان در اون فرهنگ پریود رو چطور تجربه میکنن تاثیر مستقیمی داره. درد پریود و سختیش یا حتی رفتاری که انجام میدیم میتونن الگو گرفته شده از نمون…
❤9👏1
یه مدت برای یه پروژهای باید یه سری از دانشمندهارو مصاحبهی انسانشناسانه میگرفتم ازشون، سختترین کار بررسی عقایدشون دربارهی سیاست و جهتگیری فکریشون درقبال سوال جبر و اختیار بود. تقریبا بیوقفه طفره میرن و دور سوال میچرخن چرا که معتقدن: ما فقط شواهد رو میبینیم. انسانشناسهای علمی هم یه شاخهایشون به این سمت میرن که بگن چرندیات میگید و هیچکس نمیتونه فقط شواهد رو ببینه بلکه شواهد رو با چهارچوب فکری از خاصش می…
❤9
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @anthropology_ehtnology. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“انسانشناسی” (@anthropology_ehtnology), 1,978 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/anthropology_ehtnology.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.