Channel
@emicalll_film
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,775subscribers
-8 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002398601923 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @emicalll_film |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 12 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/emicalll_film |
Film & TV — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 13:40 | 2,775 | +4 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 05:41 | 2,771 | +4 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 10:19 | 2,767 | +2 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 23:19 | 2,765 | -1 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 21:49 | 2,766 | -2 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 16:17 | 2,768 | -3 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 14:12 | 2,771 | -7 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 05:27 | 2,778 | -4 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 13:53 | 2,782 | +2 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 20:52 | 2,780 | -4 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 16:37 | 2,784 | +1 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 05:00 | 2,783 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 19 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
274 reactions across 17 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 68.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 188 | 68.6% | |
| 👍 | 50 | 18.2% | |
| 💔 | 11 | 4.01% | |
| 🤣 | 5 | 1.82% | |
| 🦄 | 4 | 1.46% | |
| 👏 | 3 | 1.09% | |
| 💩 | 3 | 1.09% | |
| 💅 | 2 | 0.73% | |
| 💋 | 2 | 0.73% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 0.73% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 0.73% | |
| 🥴 | 2 | 0.73% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 274 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 19 December 2025 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
What happened to monday اگه این لیست معرفی رو دوستداشتید، این فیلم رو دوستخواهید داشت. به بهترین شکل میشه با این فیلم دید چطور اگر خیرجمعی به خیر فردی برتری پیدا کنه، چطور با حتی بهونهها و دلایل جالب و مثبت میتونه تبدیل به یک فاجعهی انسانی بشه و تا کجاها پیش بره. از ایدهی مالتوس هم استفاده کرد برای فیلم که بنظرم جالب اومد. پن. بازیگر هر هفت خواهر، یک نفره.
❤6
Odyssey من نمیدونم این متن براتون اسپویل خواهد داشت یا نه. اگر خیلی با اسپویل مشکل دارید نخونید. اودیسهی نولان رو امشب توی سینمای مخصوصش دیدم. اول از اینکه چطور صفحه میزد و نوع فیلمبرداری برام عجیب بود جا خوردم اما رفته رفته شکل دیدن یک فیلم قدیمی، یه خاطره یا یه داستان رو به خودش گرفت. نولان دوباره نولان شده بود. بعد از اپنهایمر ازش قطع امید کرده بودم. چیزی که خیلی توی داستان درگیرم کرد رو اول تعریف میکنم و بع…
❤15
من بالاخره یه سریالی رو پیدا کردم که قابل پیشبینی نیست! از نظر داستانی و پیچیدگی با آدم بازی میکنه و نمیذاره به راحتی خط داستانی رو بفهمی و داینامیک روابط آدمهارو داخلش متوجه شی. همین باعث میشه مثل حل کردن یه معما ازش لذت ببری. از نظر قاببندی و صحنهها و طبیعت و موسیقی متن به نظرم هوشمندانه و هنرمندانه عمل کرده و شبیه فیلم و سریالهای کلاسیک و لوس کرهای نیست. داخلش فلسفهی عمیقی رو میشه گفت نمیشه پیدا کرد و…
❤18🤣1
Photo, posted without a caption
❤5
Channel name was changed to «فیلم و سریال بیگانه»
I Origins فکر میکنم فیلم خوبیه برای نشون دادن اینکه چطور عرفان و بعد چطور دیکتاتوری روش (به طور خاص ساینس) میتونه عقل سلیم و منطق انسانی رو خاموش کنه. با اینحال یه سبک کاراگاهیای داره که توی فیلمهای امریکایی زیاد پیدا میشه و من ازش لذت نمیبرم. فیلم چیل و برای وقت گذروندنی هم نیست نه چون اروم و کُند نیست بلکه چون وسط همین آرامش به صحنهی شوکآور داره که تا بعدش برای آدم ترس و حس خالی شدن قلب به جا میذاره. در ک…
❤7
AVATAR: Fire and Ash خوبی آواتار اینه که هیچوقت ناامیدت نمیکنه منتهی توی روایتی که هزاران بار گفته و گفته شده. از نظر بصری زیباست. دیالوگهای عالیای داره، پر از پند و پر از صحنههای قشنگه و قسمتهای اکشنش هم هربار بیشتر از قبله ولی متاسفانه داستان چیز جدیدی نداره. آدمهای زیادی میمیرن، آدمهای زیادی زنده میشن و جنگ خیر و شر ته نداره. برای وقتهایی که میخوای یه چیز فانتزی ببینی و خیلی باری روی دوشت نشه. پن دارا…
👍7🥴2❤1💩1
پن. من ژانر سورئال خیلی دوستدارم و اغلبشون در این ژانرن و بنظرم بهترین راه نشون دادن چیزهایی که برای ما عادت شدن و نادیدنی، توسط این ژانر میتونه اتفاق بیفته.
❤11👏3🤣2🥰2
یه لیستی از فیلمها و سریالها براتون میذارم اگر دوستداشتید نگاه کنید چون بخشی از اون تئوری دنیای برابر، حکومت مطلق و بزرگ و ایدهی کنترل همچیز تا همه چیزی داشته باشند رو به چالش میکشن و نهایت آرمان شهرهاشون رو نشون میدن. 3% Hunger games Divergent The giver Silo The tasters Time The life of others Snowpiecer Chernobyl What happened to monday شاید لیست رو بعدا آپدیت هم بکنم.
❤19💋2🔥2🤣2
Posted without readable text
سریال Hotel Del Luna جادو داشت. هم توی سریال جادو داشت هم خود سریال جادو داشت. خیلی وقت بود چیزی ندیده بودم که جادو داشته باشه. که یه ایدهی خیلی یونیک رو بتونه خیلی خوب دربیاره و ببرتت به دنیایی که وجود نداره و تورو عاشق اون دنیای خودش بکنه. حسابی به آدمهای فانتزی پسند خسته از فیلم و سریال با موضوعات تکراری پیشنهادش میکنم. من رو خیلی یاد آبپریها انداخت. از ده بهش ده میدم. پن ۱. وقتی دیدینش از لباسهای بینهای…
❤27🦄4💅2💩1
زندگی ما شبیه این فیلم شده. هرموقع دستمون به میکروفون میرسه برای آدمای مورد علاقمون داد میزنیم بونجورنو پرینچیپسا! تا شاید امید برگرده. تا شاید امید بمونه.
❤24
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @emicalll_film. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“فیلم و سریال بیگانه” (@emicalll_film), 2,775 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/emicalll_film.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.