Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

قبل از صفر (Wrong Ways)

@beforezer0

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

56subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001698796852
TypeChannel
Username@beforezer0
Descriptionبیاید تا دنیا رو آنگونه ببینیم که خیلی ها مایل به دیدن اون به این نحو نیستند. ما اینجاییم تا اشتباهات را بیازماییم. اشتباهات چگونه کار نمی‌کنند؟ شناس: @mehrshad1018 ناشناس: https://t.me/HarfinoBot?start=ff2d162257843e0
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/beforezer0

Growth

568 August 2026 — 56 subscribers10 August 2026 — 56 subscribers8 August 202610 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 2 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 55–57 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 08:0056no change
8 Aug 2026, 02:1956first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 26 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
30.4%
avg views ÷ 56 subscribers
Avg views / post
17.0
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
11.1%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 12 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 2 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held12 (26 June 20265 August 2026)
Views total34
Reactions total2
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Aug 2026, 08:00 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
668
Videos
249
Links
358

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

6 reactions across 4 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🍓233.3%
🌚116.7%
👍116.7%
💯116.7%
😭116.7%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 26 June 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 09:07 UTC18 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026

روز اختصاصی منه

🍓1💯1

Signed MEHRSHAD

5 Aug 2026, 09:06 UTC16 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @RegaPlusPhoto

امروز روز جهانی مثل سگ کار کردنه. @RegaPlus

Signed MEHRSHAD

27 Jun 2026, 14:01 UTC69 views0 reactionsread 10 August 2026

موضع من تا اینجا اینه، یه ایده اساسی باید کارکرد خودش رو در عمل نشون بده نه در سخن.

Signed MEHRSHAD

27 Jun 2026, 12:48 UTC70 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026

مثلا یکی از آراء موجود که خیلی هم بحث برانگیزه اینه که ما یه حکم کلی داریم: انسان ها تا جایی آزاد هستند که آزادی دیگران رو نقض نکنن. ولی خود همین یه مسئله پر چالشه، حد و مرز این آزادی کجاست؟ مثلا آزار کلامی یا انتقادات رادیکال سلب آزادی دیگری محسوب می‌شه؟ یا """"مثلا"""" وقتی بشر با بحرانی مثل کمبود منابع مواجه می‌شه، حق مالکیت خصوصی هنوز معنی ثابق خودش رو داره؟ اگه من مالک یک سوله غلات و گندم باشم و مردم شهرم دچار ق

👍1

Signed MEHRSHAD

27 Jun 2026, 12:22 UTC72 viewsread 10 August 2026

قائل بودن به پیامدگرایی اخلاقی از این میاد که بپذیریم ما غالبا در تشخیص حکم اخلاقی ضعف داریم و "عملا" نمی‌تونیم بفهمیم چه چیزی اخلاقی و چه چیزی غیر اخلاقیه تا مادامی که نتیجه اون حکم رو ندیدیم.

Signed MEHRSHAD

27 Jun 2026, 11:57 UTC69 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026

این مدل تعریف و تقدم بخشی به "اخلاق" ما رو یک راست می‌بره سر نظام اخلاقی کانتی یا همون اخلاق وظیفه گرا. ببینید ما یا معتقدیم که خود مفهوم اخلاق هم مثل خیلی چیز های دیگه دائما درحال تحوله یا نه. می‌شه این ایراد رو گرفت که اره حکم اخلاقی در مورد یکسری مفاهیم کلی مثل حق زندگی، حق مالکیت و... یکسانه ولی توجه نمی‌کنه به اینکا داره در مورد احکام "کلی" همچین حرفی می‌زنه.

🌚1

Signed MEHRSHAD

27 Jun 2026, 11:55 UTC57 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @emicalllPhoto

تقدم اخلاقیات بر علم پلی‌لیست یوتیوب مذکور ویدئوی یوتیوب مذکور

Signed MEHRSHAD

27 Jun 2026, 00:10 UTC51 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @NolanWritesPhoto

برای قدیمیای پیج و چنل (بیش از چند سال از این ۱۲ سال فعالیت): داشتم توی آرشیو استوری‌ها دنبال یه چیزی می‌گشتم، چشمم خورد به این استوری. از این دوران بود که تغییراتی که امروز می‌بینید شروع شدن. وگرنه منم تا حدی همراه و همدل همین رویافروش‌ها یا ساده‌لوح‌هایی بودم که امروز علیه‌شون می‌نویسم.

Signed MEHRSHAD

27 Jun 2026, 00:05 UTC43 viewsread 10 August 2026

چیزی که من از کل این نظریه فهمیدم این بود که جنت اومده از همون قائده یا سازوکار "ایمان" که اینجوری کار می‌کنه که: ((یه چیزی تا وقتی بهش ایمان نداری میک سنس نمی‌کنه ولی وقتی بهش ایمان میاری همه چیزش باهم جور می‌شه و میک سنس می‌کنه)) که البته قائده ایه که تقریبا برای تمامی عقاید بشر وجود داره، داره استفاده می‌کنه و می‌گه حالا بیاید لیبرالیسم رو بریزیم توش و با اسلام تزئینش کنیم تا کسایی که قدرت و اسلحه دارن نتونن مقابل

Signed MEHRSHAD

26 Jun 2026, 23:56 UTC43 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026

یکی از عمده دلایلی که دیگه زیاد اینجا به چیزی نمی‌پردازم اینه که هر بحثی که من احساس کنم لازمه بهش پرداخته بشه آدم های اینکاره تری هستن که بهشون می‌پردازن، پس من می‌تونم برگردم سر بدبختی های خودم.

🍓1😭1

Signed MEHRSHAD

26 Jun 2026, 23:54 UTC34 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @mmdnjkPhoto

نظریه آزادی، حقوق مالکیت فردی، ایران و دین - محمدعلی جنت‌خواه‌دوست یک بار بهش شانس بدین، اگر شریف باشین، اگر از اوباش خون‌خوار نباشین، قطعا دوستش خواهید داشت :]

Signed MEHRSHAD

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @beforezer0. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 659,208 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“قبل از صفر (Wrong Ways)” (@beforezer0), 56 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/beforezer0.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.