Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
66 measurements spanning 99 days, net +611. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,482–11,277 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 66
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
13 Nov 2026, 01:48
11,185
+14
10 Nov 2026, 18:49
11,171
+16
9 Nov 2026, 08:04
11,155
+48
8 Nov 2026, 02:31
11,107
+10
6 Nov 2026, 21:26
11,097
+12
5 Nov 2026, 19:28
11,085
+10
4 Nov 2026, 22:14
11,075
+1
3 Nov 2026, 19:30
11,074
+2
2 Nov 2026, 16:05
11,072
-3
1 Nov 2026, 13:10
11,075
+1
31 Oct 2026, 09:48
11,074
+7
30 Oct 2026, 06:41
11,067
+48
29 Oct 2026, 07:55
11,019
+1
28 Oct 2026, 07:47
11,018
+3
27 Oct 2026, 05:07
11,015
+6
26 Oct 2026, 07:01
11,009
+1
25 Oct 2026, 10:31
11,008
-4
24 Oct 2026, 13:45
11,012
+15
23 Oct 2026, 15:20
10,997
+8
22 Oct 2026, 12:40
10,989
first reading
Engagement
63 posts held, back to 8 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 60 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
88.6%
avg views ÷ 11,185 subscribers
Avg views / post
9,910
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.25%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
19
of 63 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 November 2026
Posts held
63 (8 July 2026 – 13 November 2026)
Views total
188,380
Reactions total
2,350
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
13 Nov 2026, 10:18 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
249
Videos
17
Links
124
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
58s
Average length
19s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
8,143 reactions across 62 posts, in 43 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
😁
2,698
33.1%
❤
1,667
20.5%
🤣
834
10.2%
👍
583
7.16%
🔥
412
5.06%
👻
372
4.57%
🤡
290
3.56%
❤🔥
142
1.74%
🤯
134
1.65%
💩
123
1.51%
👏
105
1.29%
😭
93
1.14%
🗿
87
1.07%
🤔
70
0.86%
😱
67
0.823%
🐳
63
0.774%
🫡
46
0.565%
✍
36
0.442%
😢
35
0.43%
👀
26
0.319%
23 further kinds
260
3.19%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 63 of the 63 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8,205 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 63 most recent posts we hold, published 8 July 2026 to 13 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 7 of 19 posts held from the last 30 days (36.8%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Крипто мейджоры начинают выглядеть привлекательными для инвестиций
+ IPO Anthropic 19 ноября ( высасывает ликву из риск активов последний месяц )
+ отчет Nvidia 18 ноября
+ развязка по Ирану в ноябре
+ Санта ралли в декабре
Если выбирать среди топов, в солане видно наибольший потенциал
- Главная конфа ( Solana Breakpoint ) через 2 дня => ожидаем бычьих драйверов и анонсов
- Мем-сезон номер 6 может начаться уже в д…
Принял решение стать акционером Nvidia по 150$ за акцию
Спасибо Hyperliquid за эту возможность
Пыль уляжется, 18 ноября отчет, новый СЕО-гей всех спасет
Тренчи переживают пятое падение активности на 90%
Среднее время между топом и началом нового роста ~3 месяца
С последнего пика в сентябре прошло уже 60 дней
=> статистически стоит ожидать новый приток ликвидности в декабре-январе
возможные катализаторы:
- санта ралли
- гонка терминалов за юзеров: новая маркетинговая кампания FOMO и ответ на неё от PumpFun
- гранты Robinhood
- мем-сезон на bnb на фоне новых листин…
Новый взлом АЙФОНОВ
Бинанс пишет, что надо СРОЧНО обновить iOS до 27.2.1
нашли уязвимость в 26.7.1, 27.0.1, 27.2
Сторонние приложения могут получать доступ к сидфразам TrustWallet и других кошельков
Конспирология: CZ дрейнит трасты, чтобы закрыть дыру в 3 ярда после взлома
https://x.com/binance/status/2120093246399430770
Исповедь короля крипто-скамеров.
Epstein Sahil Files. Разбор.
Сахил запустил >200 памп-дамп мемкоинов ( в основном токены связанные с селебрити), жестоко рагнул большинство из них.
Но за последние 4 дня его твиттер пестрит откровениями о каждом известном криптане, с которым Сахил поработал.
Джастин Сан, Эндрю Тейт, Алон ( памп фан), Ансем, Марио Навфал ( бывший лучший друг Маска ) и много-много других
Сахил выкл…
Ваш тезер ( и другая крипта ) с МЕХС уже окрашена на всех AML задним числом
Правительство Трампа ввело санкции против MEXC за помощь России и Северной Корее ( двум главным друзьям дональда?)
Маск продолжает троллить CZ
При этом пампит щиток GM на чейне бинанса ( уже 25х с твита маска )
NOT FINANCIAL ADVICE OR ANY TYPE OF ENDORSEMENT OF A TOKEN
TrustWallet паника. Почему сегодня взламывают больше кошельков, чем вчера, и когда это закончится?
На прошлой неделе взломали моего приятеля на 2.7м$. К счастью, тезер успел заморозить средства на кошельке хакера. Но 99% работяг так не повезет, увы
Если вы еще не в курсе про DarkSword, обновите айфон
Ломают любую версию моложе 18.7.7. Ломают уже год как.
Однако осенью в нашем пузыре создалось ощущение, что каждый …
CZ угрожает продать по маркету акции SpaceX на 1 миллиард $ в ответ на троллинг от Илона
Absolute Cinema
В первом комментарии жена CZ и Co-Founder Binance Ye He успокаивает акционеров, что биржа способна покрыть дыру от взлома без продаж активов
Binance хакер продает $PEPE (40m$) прямо сейчас
Трекать его действия и фронтранить на фьючах удобно через Arkham
https://arkm.com/explorer/entity/21a94755-f604-45e5-9501-6542e23005e8
😁54✍9🔥5🖕2
Showing the 12 most recent of 63 posts we hold for @web3memoriess. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republished by 55 registered channels. The 48 listed are the ones that have forwarded the most posts; the rest are counted here but not each listed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 38 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Воспоминания WEB3 спекулянта” (@web3memoriess), 11,185 subscribers as measured 13 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/web3memoriess.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.