Channel
@travel_dada
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Domains linked from posts · Cite this entry
399,923subscribers
-4,356 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 316,228–1,000,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002013453963 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @travel_dada |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/travel_dada |
Travel — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 23:58 | 399,923 | -889 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 23:35 | 400,812 | -808 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 21:21 | 401,620 | -597 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 21:11 | 402,217 | -931 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 23:51 | 403,148 | -798 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 21:21 | 403,946 | -333 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:18 | 404,279 | first reading |
5 posts held, back to 18 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 5 (18 June 2026 – 21 July 2026) |
| Views total | 301 |
| Reactions total | 2 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 17:48 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
18 reactions across 5 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 9 | 50.0% | |
| 🔥 | 4 | 22.2% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 5.56% | |
| 😍 | 1 | 5.56% | |
| 🙏 | 1 | 5.56% | |
| 🤩 | 1 | 5.56% | |
| 🦄 | 1 | 5.56% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 5 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 18reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 5 most recent posts we hold, published 18 June 2026 to 21 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
M HKA | Антверпен, Бельгия 🇧🇪 если здание успело побыть зернохранилищем, ночным клубом и музеем современного искусства, характер у него точно есть. M HKA вырос из дерзкого антверпенского авангарда. сегодня здесь около 5 000 работ, кино, перформансы и художники, которые совершенно не собираются быть удобными. Панамаренко, Отобонг Нканга, Гордон Матта-Кларк. сюда стоит идти, чтобы увидеть Антверпен не красивой откры…
❤2
📍 Nº33 - Café Frauenhuber, 1-й район чашечка обычного кофе тут стоит чуть дороже обычного и веганских современных опций тут нет) зато история отлично ощущается самое лучшее, что тут можно делать, это сидеть у окошка и наблюдать за местной интеллигенцией завсегдаев) на улице я нашла искусственные цветы, а это то, что я больше всего ненавижу в рестиках) мне это подпортило впечатление, но это моя особенность 💛 отмет…
❤3👍1😍1
плато Риттен | Южный Тироль 🇮🇹⛰️🏃♀️ один день, где бег, чудо и Фрейд помещаются в один маршрут. высоко над Больцано лежит солнечное плато. машину надо оставить внизу, наверх — канаткой за 12 минут. дальше всё складывается в идеальный круг. сначала – бег от станции Обербоцен начинается тропа Фрейда. та самая, по которой Зигмунд Фрейд гулял летом и обдумывал психоанализ. почти ровная, мягкая, в тени вековых деревье…
❤3🤩1🦄1
моя книжечка Wiener Cafés, Martin Czapka, начитает легко открываться на каждой страничке, становиться немного потрепанной и все больше мне ценной в ней описано около 100 кофеин, в которых я решила побывать пока живу в вене симсалабим, ну разве я знала, когда будучи ребенком твердила это словечко, что родом оно из этой кофейни Zartl в книге написано, что тут и салон с реликвиями мага Каланга есть, приду еще разок р…
🔥1🙏1
пещера кристаллов | Мексика 💎🇲🇽 🤩 самое красивое, что прячет под собой земля. 300 метров под пустыней чиуауа – зал с кристаллами размером с дерево. прозрачные гипсовые балки до 12 метров, по которым можно идти, как по стеклянному лесу. их нашли случайно в 2000-м: шахтёры бурили тоннель и пробились внутрь. а кристаллы росли тут полмиллиона лет, в горячей воде, в полной темноте попасть почти нельзя: +58°C и стопроц…
🔥3❤1
Showing the 5 most recent of 5 posts we hold for @travel_dada. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s.When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 10 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 29 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
2 domainsthis channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“DADA points | Кругосветка” (@travel_dada), 399,923 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/travel_dada.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.