🗣Объем торгов на Polymarket в США вырос на 266% с июня по октябрь Око Crypto 🚀 Подписаться

Channel
OKO 🚀 CRYPTO
@oko_crypto
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
9,545subscribers
-545 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001670110371 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @oko_crypto |
| Description | 🚀 Только главные криптоновости без воды в понятной форме Ссылка для друзей: @oko_crypto По всем вопросам: @vmi_times |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 33 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/oko_crypto |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 90% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Nov 2026, 15:49 | 9,545 | -14 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 01:47 | 9,559 | -16 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 21:17 | 9,575 | -6 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 05:01 | 9,581 | -7 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 09:51 | 9,588 | -14 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 03:14 | 9,602 | -19 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 04:10 | 9,621 | -17 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 17:40 | 9,638 | -13 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 01:26 | 9,651 | -10 |
| 11 Oct 2026, 23:18 | 9,661 | -26 |
| 5 Oct 2026, 16:00 | 9,687 | -40 |
| 28 Sept 2026, 01:17 | 9,727 | -41 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 05:16 | 9,768 | -15 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 23:59 | 9,783 | -28 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 10:38 | 9,811 | -24 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 02:02 | 9,835 | -22 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 03:16 | 9,857 | -46 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 19:28 | 9,903 | -27 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 01:32 | 9,930 | -42 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 17:04 | 9,972 | first reading |
Engagement
117 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 54 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 14.3%
- avg views ÷ 9,545 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,360
- 40 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.292%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 40
- of 117 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 25 of 40 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 117 (31 July 2026 – 10 November 2026) |
| Views total | 54,517 |
| Reactions total | 103 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Nov 2026, 11:37 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈4,430
- Videos
- ≈493
- Links
- ≈5,810
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 5m 39s
- Average length
- 57s
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
246 reactions across 59 posts, in 23 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 63 | 25.6% | |
| 🔥 | 32 | 13.0% | |
| 👍 | 28 | 11.4% | |
| 😁 | 23 | 9.35% | |
| 💊 | 21 | 8.54% | |
| 🤣 | 12 | 4.88% | |
| 🍾 | 10 | 4.07% | |
| 👎 | 9 | 3.66% | |
| 😡 | 8 | 3.25% | |
| 😱 | 8 | 3.25% | |
| 👏 | 5 | 2.03% | |
| 🥰 | 5 | 2.03% | |
| 🏆 | 4 | 1.63% | |
| 🤯 | 4 | 1.63% | |
| 🗿 | 3 | 1.22% | |
| 👌 | 2 | 0.813% | |
| 🙈 | 2 | 0.813% | |
| 🙏 | 2 | 0.813% | |
| 🌚 | 1 | 0.407% | |
| 🐳 | 1 | 0.407% | |
| 3 further kinds | 3 | 1.22% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 71 of the 117 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 246 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 117 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 10 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 3 of 40 posts held from the last 30 days (7.50%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
📉Крипторынок накрыла новая волна распродаж Bitcoin опустился ниже $73 000, Ethereum — $2 015, XRP — $1,05, а Solana пробила отметку $82. За последние четыре часа принудительно ликвидированы позиции трейдеров с кредитным плечом на общую сумму $600 млн. Око Crypto 🚀 Подписаться
🗣 BlackRock перевёл BTC и ETH на Coinbase на $318 млн Инвестгигант снова отправил биткоины и Ethereum на криптобиржу Coinbase. Общая сумма переводов составила $318,36 млн. Око Crypto 🚀 Подписаться
🇺🇸 Власти США взялись за Binance, Tether и криптобизнес Трампа Сенатор Ричард Блюменталь потребовал до 4 января предоставить документы о подозрительных операциях с криптовалютами, включая возможные финансовые связи с Ираном. В дальнейшем сенатор может получить полномочия для принудительного истребования документов и объяснений. Око Crypto 🚀 Подписаться
🔥6👏2🥰2
🗣В Финляндии Bitcoin-майнер заменил отопление в доме площадью 180 м² Вместо централизованного отопления владелец установил систему, которая одновременно добывает BTC и нагревает воду до 60 °C. Затем тепло поступает в радиаторы и тёплый пол. При нынешнем курсе Bitcoin доход от майнинга может полностью покрывать расходы на электроэнергию. Стоимость установки — около $20 000. Её окупаемость зависит от курса BTC, тариф…
🗣Binance закроет аккаунты пользователей в четырёх странах ЕС До 31 декабря биржа планирует закрыть счета клиентов в Польше, Франции, Италии и Испании, сообщает CoinDesk. Причина — отсутствие необходимой лицензии MiCA. Пользователям, попавшим под ограничения, необходимо вывести свои криптоактивы до конца года. Око Crypto 🚀 Подписаться
👍2👎2🌚1
🗣Украинца приговорили к тюрьме за хищение токенов на $14 млн Суд Парижа вынес приговор бывшему сотруднику Holograph Foundation — 2 года реального заключения и ещё 3 года условно. Также ему назначили штраф в размере €600 000. По данным следствия, используя административный доступ, он незаконно выпустил 1 млрд токенов HLG и перевёл их на подконтрольный кошелёк. Позже вместе с двумя сообщниками распределил средства ме…
🗣Трамп заявил, что американский фондовый рынок потерял 3 триллиона долларов за один день после промежуточных выборов. Око Crypto 🚀 Подписаться
🗣Адам Бэк назвал институциональных инвесторов двигателем следующей волны Bitcoin Глава Blockstream считает, что всё больше инвесторов будут получать доступ к BTC через пенсионные и инвестиционные фонды, а также страховые продукты, а не покупать криптовалюту напрямую. Некоторые крупные банки уже рекомендуют отводить под Bitcoin 2–4% инвестиционного портфеля. Самого Адама Бэка также называют одним из возможных канди…
🗣Binance начнёт взимать плату за хранение криптовалют Пока новые условия касаются только клиентов Binance France. С 29 ноября комиссия составит 0,025% в месяц от стоимости активов, но не менее 10 USDC. Причина — требования европейского регулирования MiCA. Французское подразделение Binance не получило необходимую лицензию и планирует закрыть клиентские счета до конца 2026 года. На пользователей Binance в Украине эт…
❤2
🗣Знаменитые мемкоины на Solana обвалились почти до нуля Токены, запущенные вокруг имён Трампа, Мелании, Игги Азалии, Канье Уэста, Эндрю Тейта, Флойда Мейвезера и других звёзд, потеряли 90–99% от своих исторических максимумов. Большинство проектов прошли по одному сценарию: громкий запуск, ажиотаж и высокий стартовый спрос, после чего стоимость токенов практически обрушилась. Око Crypto 🚀 Подписаться
❤1
🗣iPhone под угрозой: криптокошельки могут взломать через обычный сайт Из-за уязвимости iOS под названием DarkSword пользователи уже потеряли как минимум $5,57 млн. Достаточно открыть заражённую страницу в Safari на устройстве с уязвимой версией системы — злоумышленники могут получить доступ к приватным ключам без подключения кошелька и подтверждения транзакций. Основатель Binance CZ призвал владельцев iPhone срочно…
Showing the 12 most recent of 117 posts we hold for @oko_crypto. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@cryptotruexa · 68,194
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 21 August 2026
@oko_analytics · 33,987
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 3 September 2026
@oko18_ukr · 315,743
Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 10 August 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“OKO 🚀 CRYPTO” (@oko_crypto), 9,545 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/oko_crypto.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.