Channel
@BlockchainClowns
On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Cite this entry
5,337subscribers
-15 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001414675513 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @BlockchainClowns |
| Description | At Blockchain Clowns, we take cryptocurrency analysis seriously, providing valuable information to help you make informed decisions. |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/BlockchainClowns |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @BlockchainClowns/1561 · this entry20 May 2026, 10:10 UTC | @yokocryptochannel/285520 May 2026, 10:21 UTC | 1.00 | 11 minutes |
| @BlockchainClowns/1562 · this entry21 May 2026, 09:32 UTC | @yokocryptochannel/285621 May 2026, 09:36 UTC | 1.00 | 4 minutes |
| @BlockchainClowns/1570 · this entry25 May 2026, 09:47 UTC | @yokocryptochannel/286425 May 2026, 09:54 UTC | 1.00 | 7 minutes |
| @yokocryptochannel/286626 May 2026, 09:52 UTC | @BlockchainClowns/1572 · this entry26 May 2026, 09:52 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @BlockchainClowns/1574 · this entry27 May 2026, 08:45 UTC | @yokocryptochannel/286827 May 2026, 08:52 UTC | 1.00 | 7 minutes |
| @BlockchainClowns/1577 · this entry28 May 2026, 08:50 UTC | @yokocryptochannel/287128 May 2026, 08:52 UTC | 1.00 | 2 minutes |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @yokocryptochannel | 20 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 4 minutes | this entry (18–2) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 2 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 20 comparable posts for this entry, running 20 May 2026 to 29 May 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @BlockchainClowns — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 12:23 | 5,337 | -15 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:17 | 5,352 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:05 | 5,352 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 20 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 7 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
#ordi/usdt is currently retesting the broken descending channel formation on the 3D chart👀 A successful retest could trigger a massive bullish wave in the midterm👀 A confirmed rebound could drive the price toward $50🚀
#oxt/usdt Orchid is testing the support zone inside the descending channel on the 3D chart🧐 Rising buying interest at this zone suggests a potential rebound🔍 This setup could launch the price toward $0.0525✈️
#tlm/usdt Alien Worlds is consolidating near the lower border of the falling wedge formation on the 3D timeframe🧐 Momentum suggests bullish continuation on a bounce from this key zone👨💻 A bounce off support could trigger movement toward $0.009📈
#people/usdt ConstitutionDAO is retesting the breached falling wedge on the 3D chart👨💻 The retest provides a second-chance entry for patient buyers🔍 If momentum builds, we could see a strong surge toward $0.028🚀
#fil/usdt Filecoin is trading near the support zone inside the descending channel formation on the weekly timeframe🔍 Bullish momentum is likely if the price shows a strong bounce from this key support zone🧐 A successful defense could launch the price toward $83🚀
#strk/usdt Starknet is retesting the support zone inside the descending channel on the 3D chart👨💻 A confirmed reversal might send the price toward $0.76📈
#bome/usdt Book of Meme is testing the upper border of the falling wedge on the 3D chart🔥 A breakout could push the price toward $0.0043🚀
#arpa/usdt ARPA Chain is consolidating above the lower border of the descending channel on the weekly timeframe🧐 Heavy accumulation is visible at this support zone alongside increased buying volume👀 A confirmed bounce could trigger movement toward $0.116🐃
#ark/usdt Ark is maintaining its position above the lower border of the falling wedge pattern on the weekly chart🔍 Momentum suggests bullish continuation on a bounce from this key zone👨💻 The momentum could propel the price toward $1.23🐃
#ont/usdt Ontology is retesting the midline of the descending channel on the 3D chart👀 After a bounce, we might see movement toward $0.27📈
#1inch/usdt is testing the support zone inside the descending channel formation on the 3D chart💁♂️ This technical setup favors bullish positioning👨💻 A decisive bounce might propel the price toward $0.39🚀
#pha/usdt Phala Network is breaking from the falling wedge on the 3D chart🧐 The price action suggests a strong rally could be approaching as volume increases💥 A confirmed rally might see the price surge toward $0.25📈
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @BlockchainClowns. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Blockchain Clowns” (@BlockchainClowns), 5,337 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BlockchainClowns.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.